Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal最新文献_第5页

Prawo siły jako polityczna konsekwencja naturalizmu — na przykładzie myśli Jeana-Jacques’a Rousseau 自然主义的政治后果——以卢梭思想为例

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-19 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.10.1.5

Katarzyna Haremska

引用次数: 0

The problems with liberal consensus. Agonistic politics according to Chantal Mouffe 自由共识的问题。根据Chantal Mouffe的观点

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-19 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.10.1.6

A. Szklarska

引用次数: 1

Holistic model as a challenge for the medical profession 整体模式对医学专业的挑战

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-19 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.10.1.10

Nina Putała

{"title":"Holistic model as a challenge for the medical profession","authors":"Nina Putała","doi":"10.24917/20841043.10.1.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.1.10","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a doctor–patient relationship model based on the assumptions of a holistic approach to the patient. The author draws attention to selected patients’ needs, ones taken into account in this model. These are the right to autonomy and an individualised approach to the patient. These issues, considered in relation to philosophy, show a conflict between patients’ values and aspirations and doctors’ values and their experience. Nowadays, patients’ needs are protected by consumer rights as well as being strengthened by postmodern philosophy, which shapes society’s awareness of various definitions of health and underlines the right of the indi‐ vidual to self ‐determination. This situation creates an incredible challenge for doctors because attempts to assist is, according to medical knowledge, associated with an inevitable collision with the subjective perception of a patient’s health. Because of this issue, the author consid‐ ers it necessary to enquire about the needs and aspirations of not so much patients as doctors themselves. It is assumed that the definition of what is currently important for this group determines the scope of any possible admission or intentional ignorance of patients’ needs.","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"173-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41613194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Power and force: Rethinking Kojève, Arendt and Camus in the populist era 权力与力量:重新思考平民主义时代的koj<s:1>、阿伦特和加缪

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-19 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.10.1.3

Maciej Kałuża

引用次数: 0

Koncepcja „demokracji zakorzenionej” Wolfganga Merkela w kontekście współczesnego populizmu i kryzysu demokracji

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-19 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.10.1.4

Katarzyna Guczalska

{"title":"Koncepcja „demokracji zakorzenionej” Wolfganga Merkela w kontekście współczesnego populizmu i kryzysu demokracji","authors":"Katarzyna Guczalska","doi":"10.24917/20841043.10.1.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.1.4","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000Wolfgang Merkel’s concept of rooted democracy in the context of contemporary populism and the crisis of democracy: The article presents the concept of “rooted democracy” by Wolf‐ gang Merkel, which was presented in the context of the democratic crisis. The German poli‐ tical scientist indicates what democracy is — specifying the proper functioning of the regula‐ tions of the democratic system (regimes). Speaking of the weakness or strength of democracy, we must have a well‐described set of system principles that determine the degree of strength of democracy or its erosion. The above set of principles of the democratic system is thoroughly discussed in the article. In particular, the functional model of civil society is analysed. The text also explores how the crisis of democracy is understood and Merkel’s view of the impact of global capitalism on democratic institutions, which contributes to the transformation of democracy into an oligarchy. The topics discussed in the article also concern alternative, non‐ ‐liberal forms of democracy and populism. The question is whether Merkel’s concept is useful in explaining populism and its political consequences. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86621805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Between the ethics of forgiveness and the unforgivable: Reflections on Arendt’s idea of reconciliation in politics 在宽恕与不可宽恕的伦理之间:阿伦特政治和解思想的反思

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-19 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.10.1.2

R. Wonicki

{"title":"Between the ethics of forgiveness and the unforgivable: Reflections on Arendt’s idea of reconciliation in politics","authors":"R. Wonicki","doi":"10.24917/20841043.10.1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.1.2","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000The aim of the article is to examine the role that memory and oblivion, forgiveness and unforgiveness play in Hannah Arendt’s thought in relation to acts of violence in the political sphere. Political communities do not always decide to remember the crimes they have committed or the wrongs they have suffered, but neither can they always forget their mutual harms, even when there is already peace between them. Without striving to exhaust the entire subject matter of Arendt’s work, I would like to illustrate the difficulty of understanding the role forgiveness plays in her thought as well as to indicate possible solutions when forgiveness becomes unachievable within the framework of her considerations. Her reflection can be divided into two stages. The first is a focus on the idea of radical evil and the need to forgive perpetrators for their crimes. Second, under the influence of the Adolf Eichmann trial, she developed the idea of the banality of evil. This idea points to situations so terrible that they transcend all human moral judgment, making forgiveness impossible. However, even when the moral possibility of individual forgiveness has been rejected, when the legal possibility of seeking justice has been exhausted and when victims and perpetrators in the community are still unable to live together peacefully, Arendt’s thought leads us to the possibility of political reconciliation. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89660092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Probabilistic kingdom: problem of objectivity in contemporary science 概率王国:当代科学的客观性问题

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-06-29 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.9.2.9

Paweł Pruski

{"title":"Probabilistic kingdom: problem of objectivity in contemporary science","authors":"Paweł Pruski","doi":"10.24917/20841043.9.2.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.9.2.9","url":null,"abstract":"In modern science the theory of probability is one of the basic tools. Scientists using probabil‐ ity often refer to its objective interpretation. They emphasize that their probabilistic hypoth‐ eses concern objective facts, not degrees of belief. Accordingly, the following questions arise: What is the meaning of this type of probabilistic hypothesis? Is the assumption of objectivity necessary? The paper addresses these questions by analyzing objective probability in the con‐ text of the scientific debate on determinism. Two types of arguments will be presented. On the one hand, there is the assertion that objective probability can exist only in an indeterministic world. Then, on the other hand — I analyze the assertions of those who believe in the co‐ existence of objective probability and determinism. As a result I show that the acceptance of deterministic and indeterministic fields as possible areas where objective probability can occur is extremely problematic. Depending on the chosen area we encounter different types of prob‐ lems. Therefore, I show that a significant number of these problems are associated with the acceptance of incorrect metaphysical assumptions. And finally, I postulate that the objectivity of probability (and assumptions pertaining to it) can be reduced (without any losses) to the","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"317-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49139384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Die Bedeutung der Bildung: Im Gespräch mit Martin Heidegger und Hannah Arendt. Ein Vortrag gehalten am 18.06.2018 an der Universität Augsburg 教育的意义:在与马丁·海德格尔和汉娜·阿伦特的对话中9月6日在奥格斯堡大学

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-06-29 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.9.2.10

Paulina Sosnowska

{"title":"Die Bedeutung der Bildung: Im Gespräch mit Martin Heidegger und Hannah Arendt. Ein Vortrag gehalten am 18.06.2018 an der Universität Augsburg","authors":"Paulina Sosnowska","doi":"10.24917/20841043.9.2.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.9.2.10","url":null,"abstract":"The importance of education: In conversation with Martin Heidegger and Hannah Arendt. The text is a lecture delivered in German at Augsburg University in 2018. Its aim was to share with German colleagues from the Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences (including both Philosophy and Education) the research whose effect was the publication of Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger. Philosophy, modernity and education (American edition 2019). The thesis of this lecture (and the book) is that Arendt’s answer to Heidegger’s philosophy, intelligible only within the wide context of both thinkers’ struggles with the philosophical tradition of the West, also opens up a new horizon of conceptualizing the relationship between philosophy and education. This enterprise begins with a critical reconstruction of concepts that traditionally connected education to philosophy. Thereafter, it is a development of Arendt’s thesis of the broken thread of tradition, situated in the wider context of Heideggerian philosophy and his entanglement with Nazism, and consequently, it questions the traditional relationship between philosophy and education. In the final parts of this book returns the problem of dialogue between philosophy, thinking, and university education in times whose political and ethical framework is no longer determined by the continuity of tradition, but the caesura of 20th‑century totalitarianism.","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"331-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44927814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Modern moral reinterpretation of Jesus and its value to the philosophy of religion 现代道德对耶稣的重新诠释及其对宗教哲学的价值

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-06-26 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.9.2.5

Antoni Torzewski

引用次数: 0

Altering identities. Possibilities of understanding identity in phenomenological pedagogy 改变身份。现象学教育学中理解同一性的可能性

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-06-26 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.9.2.3

Patrizia Breil

{"title":"Altering identities. Possibilities of understanding identity in phenomenological pedagogy","authors":"Patrizia Breil","doi":"10.24917/20841043.9.2.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.9.2.3","url":null,"abstract":"In one way or another, the othe r plays an important role in educational settings. Over the last few decades, the recourse to philosophical phenomenology has proved to be helpful for the discussion of this topic. Coming from this thematic direction, this article focuses on the othe r in its constitutive function for the construction of identity. Both within the phenom‐ enologist Bernhard Waldenfels’ theory of responsivity as well as in the pedagogue Wilfried Lippitz’ theory of alterity, the othe r is a structural part of the self. It will be shown that within these theories the possible dangers of an encounter with the other cannot be addressed in an adequate way. However, this is especially important in educational contexts. Therefore, with regard to the philosophies of Jean ‐Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, I would like to present two additional phenomenological approaches from which the pedagogical discussion can benefit. Both Sartre and Beauvoir put great focus on possible obstacles regarding the en‐ counter with the othe r. Whereas Sartre identifies negativity as an essential part of human ex‐ istence, Beauvoir enriches these thoughts with an ethical component. Against the background of these philosophies, the othe r comes into view as a possible source of both objectification and empowerment. Lastly, the article shows that an implementation of these considerations in teacher training can lead to a deeper understanding of the constitution of identity and the inherent possibilities of any interaction with the othe r.","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"225-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48295386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0