2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering最新文献

Toward Defining the Role of the Software Architect 定义软件架构师的角色

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.17

Sofia Sherman, I. Hadar

引用次数: 7

Facilitating Collaboration between COTS Stakeholders via Principles of Advanced ISD Methods: The Vendor Perspective 通过高级ISD方法原则促进COTS涉众之间的协作:供应商视角

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.11

Anat Segal-Raviv, I. Hadar, M. Levy

{"title":"Facilitating Collaboration between COTS Stakeholders via Principles of Advanced ISD Methods: The Vendor Perspective","authors":"Anat Segal-Raviv, I. Hadar, M. Levy","doi":"10.1109/CHASE.2015.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE.2015.11","url":null,"abstract":"Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) systems continue to evolve after acquisition while adapting to an ever-changing organizational environment. Many software changes are delivered through the change request (CR) knowledge-intensive process that can be viewed as a small development cycle. In this study we mapped COTS-related risks documented in literature to COTS-based systems development (CBSD) phases. We then analyzed evidence for knowledge gaps between stakeholders, such as misunderstanding systems and business aspects, which hinder CR delivery. For each gap we mapped related risks and proposed methods, taken from advanced information system development (ISD) methodologies focused on human, collaborative and knowledge aspects, as mitigation strategies. Our analysis indicates that these methods, which encourage collaboration and knowledge sharing, can serve as feasible mitigation strategies for the knowledge gaps found in the study. Taking a knowledge-centric perspective of the CBSD process by mitigating risks via human-centric development methods is the first step toward a new model for risk management in CBSD.","PeriodicalId":300965,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125777748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Regulation as an Enabler for Collaborative Software Development 规则作为协同软件开发的推动者

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.29

Maryi Arciniegas-Mendez, A. Zagalsky, M. Storey, A. Hadwin

引用次数: 1

Integrating Usability-Engineering into the Software Developing Processes of SME: A Case Study of Software Developing SME in Germany 将可用性工程融入中小企业软件开发过程——以德国中小企业软件开发为例

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.22

Dominik Hering, Tobias Schwartz, A. Boden, V. Wulf

引用次数: 8

Characteristics of Sustainable OSS Projects: A Theoretical and Empirical Study 可持续OSS项目的特征:理论与实证研究

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.9

Hideaki Hata, Taiki Todo, Saya Onoue, Ken-ichi Matsumoto

引用次数: 33

The Human Side of Software as a Service: Building a Tighter Fit between Human Experiences and SOA Design Practices 软件即服务的人的一面:在人的体验和SOA设计实践之间建立更紧密的契合

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.31

Victoria Karaseva, A. Seffah

{"title":"The Human Side of Software as a Service: Building a Tighter Fit between Human Experiences and SOA Design Practices","authors":"Victoria Karaseva, A. Seffah","doi":"10.1109/CHASE.2015.31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE.2015.31","url":null,"abstract":"Software as a Service (SaaS) is now recognized as an effective model for the development, deployment, and customization of software. It has been reported that it reduces the costs as well as ensures the long-term sustainability of software systems. Monolithic software systems are seen as a set of interrelated and geographically distributed services over the Internet. Developers and providers can easily customize services while being able to accommodate a large range of stakeholders. At the core of this service orientation of the whole field of software development are the Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) design principles. These principles detail what we should do, but not how and by whom it has to be done. From a human perspective -- all stakeholders -- we argue that the current SOA design principles can be linked and benefit from the user experience/user-centric design. Such combination can lead to a user experience-centric and SOA-based design approach that guarantees that SaaS is secure, yet trustable, useful, usable and accessible. In this position paper, we reviewed SOA/SaaS from the human dimension with the goal to bridging the gaps between SOA design principles and the User Experience (UX) design communities including Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and service design. One practical goal is to enhance the SOA, as a technological platform with elements of UX including the social aspects of their interactions within the organizational structure and processes.","PeriodicalId":300965,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133905088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

An Empirical Investigation of Personality Traits of Software Testers 软件测试人员人格特征的实证研究

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.7

Tanjila Kanij, Robert G. Merkel, J. Grundy

引用次数: 43

Can Social Screencasting Help Developers Learn New Tools? 社交视频能帮助开发者学习新工具吗?

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.18

Kevin Lubick, Titus Barik, E. Murphy-Hill

引用次数: 3

Ask the Engineers: Exploring Repertory Grids and Personal Constructs for Software Data Analysis 问工程师:探索存储网格和个人结构的软件数据分析

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.25

L. Layman, C. Seaman, D. Falessi, Madeline Diep

{"title":"Ask the Engineers: Exploring Repertory Grids and Personal Constructs for Software Data Analysis","authors":"L. Layman, C. Seaman, D. Falessi, Madeline Diep","doi":"10.1109/CHASE.2015.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE.2015.25","url":null,"abstract":"Maturity in software projects is often equated with data-driven predictability. However, data collection is expensive and measuring all variables that may correlate with project outcome is neither practical nor feasible. In contrast, a project engineer can identify a handful of factors that he or she believes influence the success of a project. The challenge is to quantify engineers' insights in a way that is useful for data analysis. In this exploratory study, we investigate the repertory grid technique for this purpose. The repertory grid technique is an interview-based procedure for eliciting \"constructs\" (e.g., Adhering to coding standards) that individuals believe influence a worldly phenomenon (e.g., What makes a high-quality software project) by comparing example elements from their past (e.g., Projects they have worked on). We investigate the relationship between objective metrics of project performance and repertory grid constructs elicited from eight software engineers. Our results show correlations between the engineers' subjective constructs and the objective project outcome measures. This suggests that repertory grids may be of benefit in developing models of project outcomes, particularly when project data is limited.","PeriodicalId":300965,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124056471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Perceptions of Diversity on Git Hub: A User Survey 对Git Hub多样性的看法:一项用户调查

2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering Pub Date : 2015-05-16 DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2015.14

Bogdan Vasilescu, V. Filkov, Alexander Serebrenik

引用次数: 74