2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP)最新文献

筛选

英文中文

Action-based Recommendation in Pull-request Development 拉取请求开发中基于动作的建议

2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP) Pub Date : 2020-02-28 DOI: 10.1145/3379177.3388904

M. Azeem, Sebastiano Panichella, Andrea Di Sorbo, Alexander Serebrenik, Qing Wang

{"title":"Action-based Recommendation in Pull-request Development","authors":"M. Azeem, Sebastiano Panichella, Andrea Di Sorbo, Alexander Serebrenik, Qing Wang","doi":"10.1145/3379177.3388904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3379177.3388904","url":null,"abstract":"Pull requests (PRs) selection is a challenging task faced by integrators in pull-based development (PbD), with hundreds of PRs submitted on a daily basis to large open-source projects. Managing these PRs manually consumes integrators’ time and resources and may lead to delays in the acceptance, response, or rejection of PRs that can propose bug fixes or feature enhancements. On the one hand, well-known platforms for performing PbD, like GitHub, do not provide built-in recommendation mechanisms for facilitating the management of PRs. On the other hand, prior research on PRs recommendation has focused on the likelihood of either a PR being accepted or receive a response by the integrator. In this paper, we consider both those likelihoods, this to help integrators in the PRs selection process by suggesting to them the appropriate actions to undertake on each specific PR. To this aim, we propose an approach, called CARTESIAN (aCceptance And Response classificaTion-based requESt I dentifcAtioN) modeling the PRs recommendation according to PR actions. In particular, CARTESIAN is able to recommend three types of PR actions: accept, respond, and reject. We evaluated CARTESIAN on the PRs of 19 popular GitHub projects. The results of our study demonstrate that our approach can identify PR actions with an average precision and recall of about 86%. Moreover, our findings also highlight that CARTESIAN outperforms the results of two baseline approaches in the task of PRs selection.","PeriodicalId":299473,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130418887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

首页上一页