{"title":"Text Matters: Some Reflections on the Forging of a New Constitutional Jurisprudence in South Africa","authors":"K. O’Regan","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00886.x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00886.x","url":null,"abstract":"The South African Constitution establishes a constitutional democracy with a strong form of constitutional review. The Constitutional Court is required to declare invalid any legislation or conduct of the President which is inconsistent with the Constitution. The author, a former judge of the Constitutional Court, argues that the text of the Constitution has been an important determinant of the Court's jurisprudence, both in relation to the Court's jurisprudence concerning the institutional structures established by the Constitution and its Bill of Rights jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125819960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Who is Afraid of Radical Pluralism? Legal Order and Political Stability in the Postnational Space","authors":"Nico Krisch","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00492.x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00492.x","url":null,"abstract":"Constitutional pluralism has become a principal model for understanding the legal and political structure of the European Union. Yet its variants are highly diverse, ranging from moderate “institutional” forms, closer to constitutionalist thinking, to “radical” ones which renounce a common framework to connect the different layers of law at play. Neil MacCormick, whose work was key for the rise of constitutional pluralism, shifted his approach from radical to institutional pluralism over time. This paper reconstructs the reasons for this shift - mainly concerns about political stability that also underlie many others' skepticism vis‐a‐vis radical pluralist ideas. It then seeks to show why such concerns are likely overdrawn. In the fluid, contested space of postnational politics, a common, overarching frame is problematic as it might inflame, rather than tame, tensions. Leaving fundamental issues open along radical pluralist lines may help to work around points of highly charged contestation and provide opportunities for resistance from less powerful actors.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115952763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Spain’s Constitutional Reform: What is Seen and Not Seen","authors":"J. Abad, J. Galante","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1945775","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1945775","url":null,"abstract":"The recent constitutional reform agreed by the Spanish Parliament on 7 September 2011 aims to mitigate concerns over public finances by constraining the general government’s spending and borrowing capacity. In their analysis of this historic agreement, Jose M. Abad and Javier Hernandez Galante find that the reform represents a major step forward, but that it must be integrated within a more ambitious programme of structural reforms, with special emphasis on areas such as the labour market and the tax system, before there can be any real prospect of resuscitating the Spanish economy.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131768059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reform of Legal Regulation of Parties in a Context of the Concept of ‘Operated Democracy’","authors":"O. M. Reshetnikov","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1912113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1912113","url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes legal and historical questions of reforming of political system of the Russian Federation in 2004-2006.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133340332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reflections on Institutional Design – Especially Treaty Bodies","authors":"G. Ulfstein","doi":"10.4337/9780857931290.00024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931290.00024","url":null,"abstract":"The paper discussed different forms of international institutions, especially treaty bodies.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129055350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"In the Constitutional Hall of Mirrors: Reflections of the Irish Constitution from Abroad","authors":"T. O'Dowd","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1938692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1938692","url":null,"abstract":"The Programme for Government of the Fine Gael-Labour coalition formed after the 2011 general election contains a commitment to establish a “Constitutional Convention” to advise on the desirability and form of constitutional amendments in relation to a series of specified matters and to propose other amendments it considers to be appropriate. This commitment appears to have been prompted, at least in part by the recommendation made by the Joint Committee on the Constitution, that the issue of electoral reform be considered by a citizens’ assembly. It seems timely to review how the Irish constitutional and Irish constitutional practice has been viewed and appraised in the course of similar exercises in Canada and Australia and what influence this has had there. A similar exchange of ideas and experiences can be found in the reflection of Irish constitutional law to be found in the case law of courts outside Ireland. Both the deliberations of the citizens’ assemblies and the analysis of foreign courts can offer a useful perspective on Irish constitutional law and practice. The first may hold valuable lessons for how the Constitutional Convention should operate and the second may be a source of persuasive arguments as to the proper development of Irish constitutional law itself.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"59 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113944318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Charter of Fundamental Rights: History and Prospects in Post-Lisbon Europe","authors":"David H. Anderson, C. Murphy","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1953619","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1953619","url":null,"abstract":"The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights has been incorporated into European constitutional law ten years after it was adopted by the EU institutions. In that time the Charter developed from a ‘solemn proclamation’ to a persuasive authority before the European Courts and now a binding Charter for the EU. It has been referred to in the case-law of both the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. However, the Charter’s history and future are the subject of political contest and academic debate. Along with the accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, it is likely to provide much scope for debate in coming years. This paper assesses the Charter’s development from a proposal to increase EU legitimacy to its current status as the Union’s own Bill of Rights. It examines the rights protected by the Charter, their sources and how they may be interpreted in light of the ‘Explanations’ in the Official Journal. The case-law of the European Courts on the Charter is cataloged and analyzed to determine the Charter’s likely value in human rights litigation. Finally, the chapter analyses the application of the Charter across the EU and considers its implications in the Member States that have limited its effect. Three related themes are woven throughout the analysis: the conflicting motivations of the Member States and the EU institutions, the potential for broadening and strengthening human rights protection in the EU and the Charter’s relationship with the European Convention on Human Rights.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133668262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Association and Exclusion: The Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism","authors":"H. Hirsch","doi":"10.37974/ALF.173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.173","url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that a central paradox of liberal constitutionalism can be found by closely examining the freedom of association. Freedom of association includes the right not to associate; thus a regime of individual rights facilitates the creation of marginalized individuals and groups. These groups then seek social recognition, which liberal constitutionalism cannot easily grant, unless the state itself becomes complicit in discriminatory action. The existence and protection of a sphere of civil society is thus a key mechanism of both freedom and inequality. The paper uses American case law to explore this paradox, and to examine the status and likely strategy of societal pariah groups, and then examines the manner in which liberal political theory (Hannah Arendt, Nancy Rosenblum, Amy Gutmann, Iris Marion Young) address related questions.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127428498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Lockean Constitution: Separation of Powers and the Limits of Prerogative","authors":"David Jenkins","doi":"10.7202/1005132AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1005132AR","url":null,"abstract":"In the post-9/11 era, many legal scholars have advanced theories of constitutional law that make allowance for unreviewable discretionary decision making by the executive branch, particularly in the context of the “war on terror”. Drawing on Lockean constitutional theory for normative support, the author develops an alternative constitutional model that addresses the problem of discretionary executive power. Locke’s constitution divides political power between the executive and the legislature, with the latter checking and balancing the former. Both the executive and the legislature have a fiduciary trust to act for the public good. Locke closely links the public good and the constitution such that any breach of the constitution is per se a breach of the public good. Therefore, unreviewable decision making by the executive always violates its trust because it is a breach of the constitution. After setting out Locke’s theory of separation of powers, the author presents a modified model that makes the judiciary, in addition to the legislature, responsible for the accountability of executive decision makers. Although the executive retains its prerogative power, it must always remain accountable to the legislature and the courts, even in emergencies.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129668869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction: A Brief Trajectory of Public Choice and Public Law","authors":"D. Farber, Anne Joseph O'Connell","doi":"10.4337/9781849804899.00006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849804899.00006","url":null,"abstract":"Public choice theory plays a critical role in public law, particularly for legal scholarship and to some extent for doctrine. To be sure, it is not the only game in town, but it is an important one. The Research Handbook on Public Choice and Public Law is part of a new series, Research Handbooks in Law and Economics, which has been developed under the direction of Judge Richard Posner and Professor Francesco Parisi. Each volume in the series aims to serve as a reference, providing helpful introductions to important topics, and as a provocateur, suggesting weaknesses and important areas for further exploration. Our volume also emphasizes interdisciplinary and empirical approaches to public choice and public law, drawing from a range of social sciences and legal subjects. It is broken into four major segments: foundations, constitutional law and democracy, administrative design and action, and examples of specific statutory schemes. This introductory essay has several goals and audiences. To situate the novice, it starts by providing some cursory background on public choice theory, which the first part of the book covers in a more deliberate and stimulating manner. For the more sophisticated reader, it suggests that the field has shifted considerably in its aims and even its methods, comparing its origins to its current manifestations. For scholars engaged in this or related research, it then offers some lessons to consider as the field moves forward. Finally, for all readers, it summarizes the chapters contained in the volume.","PeriodicalId":284892,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Constitutions eJournal","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125958447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}