发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Law in American History, Volume III最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The American Legal Academy and Jurisprudence II 美国法律学院与法理学2
Law in American History, Volume III Pub Date : 2019-05-27 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190634940.003.0007
G. White
{"title":"The American Legal Academy and Jurisprudence II","authors":"G. White","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190634940.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190634940.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"By the close of World War II, Legal Realism had become the dominant jurisprudential perspective in the American legal academy. But developments connected to the use of totalitarian regimes of the left and right put pressure on the apparent claim of realists that “law” was simply the decisions of officials holding power. In response to that concern, and to the “antidemocratic” dimensions of judicial review of major institutions by unelected judges, “process theory,” featuring emphasis on institutional constraints and the obligation of judges to describe cases on legal principles transcending results in cases, became entrenched as a jurisprudential perspective. But then, between the 1970s and the close of the century, process theory lost its resonance. The chapter surveys those developments.","PeriodicalId":283594,"journal":{"name":"Law in American History, Volume III","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129639197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Law and Politics 法律与政治
Law in American History, Volume III Pub Date : 2019-05-23 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190634940.003.0013
G. White
{"title":"Law and Politics","authors":"G. White","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190634940.003.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190634940.003.0013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Bush v. Gore, when it was first decided, was widely criticized by commentators as an unjustifiable intervention by the Supreme Court into the Florida electoral process in the 2000 presidential election. Two decades later, the case seems much less significant, and arguably less controversial. The chapter traces the “journey” of the Supreme Court toward Bush v. Gore, which consisted of a combination of its abandoning the “political question” doctrine, which posited that the Court should avoid reviewing legislative decisions affecting the redistricting of voters in political elections, and the unique circumstances of the 2000 presidential election in Florida and Florida’s electoral processes.","PeriodicalId":283594,"journal":{"name":"Law in American History, Volume III","volume":"22 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116857149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信