Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics最新文献_第2页

Is There any Use for a Notion of the Correct Interpretation of an Utterance? 话语正确解释的概念有什么用?

Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1515/9783110628937-005

P. Leth

引用次数: 1

Subsentential Speech Acts, the Argument from Connectivity, and Situated Contextualism 次句言语行为、连通性论证与情境主义

Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1515/9783110628937-008

J. Odrowąż-Sypniewska

引用次数: 0

Expressive Meanings and Expressive Commitments. A Case of Meaning as Use 表达意义和表达承诺。意义即用途的案例

Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.1515/9783110628937-010

L. Hess

引用次数: 3

Negotiating What Is Said in the Face of Miscommunication 在沟通不畅的情况下协商该说些什么

Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/9783110628937-006

Chi-Hé Elder

{"title":"Negotiating What Is Said in the Face of Miscommunication","authors":"Chi-Hé Elder","doi":"10.1515/9783110628937-006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110628937-006","url":null,"abstract":"In post-Gricean pragmatics, communication is said to be successful when a hearer recovers a speaker’s intended message. On this assumption, proposals for ‘what is said’ – the semantic, propositional meaning of a speaker’s utterance – are typically centred around the content the speaker aimed to communicate. However, these proposals tend not to account for the fact that speakers can be deliberately vague leaving no clear proposition to be recovered, or that a speaker can accept a hearer’s misconstrual even though the speaker didn’t intend it. In such cases, identifying ‘what is said’ is more contentious, even though communication is arguably no less successful. Building on recent interactionist approaches to meaning, this chapter offers a proposal for ‘what is said’ that can account for cases of ‘imperfect’ communication in which the recovery of a speaker’s intention goes awry. This involves taking ‘what is said’ as the co-constructed meaning that the speaker and hearer jointly agree on, giving ‘grounded meanings’ – those mutually and manifestly accepted into the discourse by speaker and hearer – higher precedence in a theory of communication than simply the speaker’s intended meaning. In such cases, rather than speaker and hearer converging at the level of explicit utterance content, communication is expected to be successful just in case the hearer recovers a proposition which is compatible with the speaker’s higher-order discursive goal. The hearer’s uptake is then allowed to override the content of the speaker’s intended meaning in the process of negotiating ‘what is said’.","PeriodicalId":281260,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134448409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6