Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
One size doesn't fit all: diversifying "the user" using personas and emotional scenarios 一种方法并不适用于所有人:使用人物角色和情感场景使“用户”多样化
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering Pub Date : 2014-11-17 DOI: 10.1145/2661685.2661691
A. Lopez-Lorca, Tim Miller, S. Pedell, Antonette Mendoza, Alen Keirnan, L. Sterling
{"title":"One size doesn't fit all: diversifying \"the user\" using personas and emotional scenarios","authors":"A. Lopez-Lorca, Tim Miller, S. Pedell, Antonette Mendoza, Alen Keirnan, L. Sterling","doi":"10.1145/2661685.2661691","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2661685.2661691","url":null,"abstract":"It is common practice in software engineering to develop a product for the \"user\". The concepts of users and actors typically oversimplify the variety of people that could use a system in a given scenario. By developing the system for actors, many software engineers effectively develop the system for themselves, embodying the abstract actors with their own personalities - i.e. how would I use the system if I was this actor? A single perspective may be sufficient for situations with a well-defined workflow, however, many systems in the social and domestic domains should consider people's emotional response to systems, which impact product acceptance. To ensure that emotional desires are met and that a product appeals to the intended audience, we advocate the use of personas within emotional scenarios. Personas and scenarios can be used to explore the diversity of people's background, emotions and motivations, and how they would react emotionally to design decisions. We describe our experience using personas and emotional scenarios in three projects related to people's health, where emotions are ever present, in the domains of aged wellbeing and mental health.","PeriodicalId":280437,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127543024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Towards discovering the role of emotions in stack overflow 试图发现情感在堆栈溢出中的作用
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering Pub Date : 2014-11-17 DOI: 10.1145/2661685.2661689
Nicole Novielli, Fabio Calefato, F. Lanubile
{"title":"Towards discovering the role of emotions in stack overflow","authors":"Nicole Novielli, Fabio Calefato, F. Lanubile","doi":"10.1145/2661685.2661689","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2661685.2661689","url":null,"abstract":"Today, people increasingly try to solve domain-specific problems through interaction on online Question and Answer (Q&A) sites, such as Stack Overflow. The growing success of the Stack Overflow community largely depends on the will of their members to answer others' questions. Recent research has shown that the factors that push members of online communities encompass both social and technical aspects. Yet, we argue that also the emotional style of a technical question does influence the probability of promptly obtaining a satisfying answer. In this paper, we describe the design of an empirical study aimed to investigate the role of affective lexicon on the questions posted in Stack Overflow.","PeriodicalId":280437,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131349637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90
An empirical investigation of socio-technical code review metrics and security vulnerabilities 对社会技术代码审查度量和安全漏洞的实证调查
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering Pub Date : 2014-11-17 DOI: 10.1145/2661685.2661687
Andrew Meneely, Alberto Rodriguez Tejeda, B. Spates, Shannon Trudeau, Danielle Neuberger, K. Whitlock, Christopher Ketant, Kayla Davis
{"title":"An empirical investigation of socio-technical code review metrics and security vulnerabilities","authors":"Andrew Meneely, Alberto Rodriguez Tejeda, B. Spates, Shannon Trudeau, Danielle Neuberger, K. Whitlock, Christopher Ketant, Kayla Davis","doi":"10.1145/2661685.2661687","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2661685.2661687","url":null,"abstract":"One of the guiding principles of open source software development is to use crowds of developers to keep a watchful eye on source code. Eric Raymond declared Linus'' Law as \"many eyes make all bugs shallow\", with the socio-technical argument that high quality open source software emerges when developers combine together their collective experience and expertise to review code collaboratively. Vulnerabilities are a particularly nasty set of bugs that can be rare, difficult to reproduce, and require specialized skills to recognize. Does Linus' Law apply to vulnerabilities empirically? In this study, we analyzed 159,254 code reviews, 185,948 Git commits, and 667 post-release vulnerabilities in the Chromium browser project. We formulated, collected, and analyzed various metrics related to Linus' Law to explore the connection between collaborative reviews and vulnerabilities that were missed by the review process. Our statistical association results showed that source code files reviewed by more developers are, counter-intuitively, more likely to be vulnerable (even after accounting for file size). However, files are less likely to be vulnerable if they were reviewed by developers who had experience participating on prior vulnerability-fixing reviews. The results indicate that lack of security experience and lack of collaborator familiarity are key risk factors in considering Linus’ Law with vulnerabilities.","PeriodicalId":280437,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116602043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50
Can collaborative tagging improve user feedback? a case study 协作标记能改善用户反馈吗?案例研究
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering Pub Date : 2014-11-17 DOI: 10.1145/2661685.2661692
Rana Alkadhi, Dennis Pagano, B. Brügge
{"title":"Can collaborative tagging improve user feedback? a case study","authors":"Rana Alkadhi, Dennis Pagano, B. Brügge","doi":"10.1145/2661685.2661692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2661685.2661692","url":null,"abstract":"User feedback is a rich source of information which can help developers to improve software quality and identify missing features. However, developers need to analyze user feedback in order to assess its relevance and potential impact, which bears several challenges due to its quantity, quality, structure, and content, particularly when feedback volume is high. In this paper we present the results of a case study to explore which role collaborative tagging can play to improve user feedback, in particular, its impact on the navigation within, understandability, and structure of user feedback. Our results indicate that collaborative tagging might contribute to decrease the pain when analyzing and organizing user feedback.","PeriodicalId":280437,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126556648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Eliciting and visualising trust expectations using persona trust characteristics and goal models 使用角色信任特征和目标模型引出和可视化信任期望
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering Pub Date : 2014-11-17 DOI: 10.1145/2661685.2661690
Shamal Faily, I. Flechais
{"title":"Eliciting and visualising trust expectations using persona trust characteristics and goal models","authors":"Shamal Faily, I. Flechais","doi":"10.1145/2661685.2661690","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2661685.2661690","url":null,"abstract":"Developers and users rely on trust to simplify complexity when building and using software. Unfortunately, the invisibility of trust and the richness of a system's context of use means that factors influencing trust are difficult to see, and assessing its implications before a system is built is complex and time-consuming. This paper presents an approach for eliciting and visualising differences between trust expectations using persona cases, goal models, and complementary tool support. We evaluate our approach by using it to identify misplaced trust expectations in a software infrastructure by its users and application developers.","PeriodicalId":280437,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126278415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Supporting collaboration of heterogeneous teams in an augmented team room 在增强的团队房间中支持异构团队的协作
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering Pub Date : 2014-11-17 DOI: 10.1145/2661685.2661688
Markus Kleffmann, Matthias Book, V. Gruhn
{"title":"Supporting collaboration of heterogeneous teams in an augmented team room","authors":"Markus Kleffmann, Matthias Book, V. Gruhn","doi":"10.1145/2661685.2661688","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2661685.2661688","url":null,"abstract":"It is often difficult for a team of stakeholders with heterogeneous backgrounds to maintain a common understanding of a system’s structure and the challenges in its implementation. Thus, especially in complex software projects, risks and inconsistencies are easily overlooked. In this paper, we present the concept of an Augmented Interaction Room (AugIR), i.e. a physical team room whose walls are outfitted with wall-sized touchscreens that visualize different aspects of a software system in the form of various model sketches. These sketches can be annotated by the stakeholders in order to explicitly mark important elements or indicate aspects that are critical for project success. The AugIR strives to support the collaborative work of heterogeneous teams and especially targets the inclusion of non-technical stakeholders into the communication process. Therefore, the AugIR continuously monitors the stakeholders’ design and modeling activities and analyzes the relationships between annotated contents to automatically uncover inconsistencies, contradictions and hidden potential project risks.","PeriodicalId":280437,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126094326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Developer involvement considered harmful?: an empirical examination of Android bug resolution times 开发者的参与被认为是有害的?: Android漏洞解决时间的实证检验
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering Pub Date : 2014-11-17 DOI: 10.1145/2661685.2661686
Subhajit Datta, Proshanta Sarkar, S. Majumder
{"title":"Developer involvement considered harmful?: an empirical examination of Android bug resolution times","authors":"Subhajit Datta, Proshanta Sarkar, S. Majumder","doi":"10.1145/2661685.2661686","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2661685.2661686","url":null,"abstract":"In large scale software development ecosystems, there is a common perception that higher developer involvement leads to faster resolution of bugs. This is based on conjectures around more ``eyeballs\" making bugs ``shallow\" -- whose validity and applicability are not without dispute. In this paper, we posit that the level of developer attention as well as its extent of diversity influence how quickly bugs get resolved. We report results from a study of 1,000+ Android bugs. We find statistically significant evidence that attention and diversity have contrasting relationships with the resolution time of bugs, even after controlling for factors such as interest, importance, dependency etc. Our results can offer helpful insights on team dynamics and project governance.","PeriodicalId":280437,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128609596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering 第六届社会软件工程国际研讨会论文集
Dennis Schenk, M. Lungu
{"title":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","authors":"Dennis Schenk, M. Lungu","doi":"10.1145/2661685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2661685","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":280437,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129419766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信