14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07)最新文献

MEtaGile: An Agile Domain-Specific Modeling Environment MEtaGile:一个敏捷领域特定的建模环境

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-28 DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2007.68

Olivier Buchwalder

引用次数: 2

Function Call Flow based Fitness Function Design in Evolutionary Testing 进化测试中基于函数调用流的适应度函数设计

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/ASPEC.2007.13

Xiyang Liu, Miao Zhang, Zhiwen Bai, Lei Wang, Wen Du, Yan Wang

{"title":"Function Call Flow based Fitness Function Design in Evolutionary Testing","authors":"Xiyang Liu, Miao Zhang, Zhiwen Bai, Lei Wang, Wen Du, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1109/ASPEC.2007.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPEC.2007.13","url":null,"abstract":"Evolutionary Testing has been shown a promising technology for the automatic test data generation. It reformulates test data generation as a metaheuristic search. A well- designed fitness function is essential to the efficiency of evolutionary search. Many efforts have been directed at the design and implementation of fitness function in recent years. However, previous work has just focused on the control dependency of the target on the branches in the same function. When function calls exist in the desired execution trace to the target, the evaluation of the test data on the coverage of these function calls, which should be provided to the evolutionary search, is not captured by the existing fitness function. In this case, the existing fitness function can not fairly evaluate the test data. And the evolutionary search will be hampered or even fail in severe cases. In this paper, a new term is first proposed to incorporate into the existing fitness function. It is applied to evaluate the test data's coverage of function calls along the desired path to the target. The new fitness function can evaluate the test data more fairly, resulting in a better guidance to the evolutionary search. This can be seen by the experiments carried out on two cases.","PeriodicalId":273688,"journal":{"name":"14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114667687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

ezContract: Using Marker Library and Bytecode Instrumentation to Support Design by Contract in Java 在Java中使用标记库和字节码检测来支持契约式设计

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2007.55

Yu Chin Cheng, Chien-Tsun Chen, Chin-Yun Hsieh

引用次数: 4

An Empirical Study of Class Sizes for Large Java Systems 大型Java系统类大小的实证研究

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2007.20

Hongyu Zhang, Hee Beng Kuan Tan

引用次数: 22

Secure Behavior of Web Browsers to Prevent Information Leakages 浏览器的安全行为，防止信息泄露

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2007.82

T. Tateishi, Naoshi Tabuchi

引用次数: 3

Figure Out the Current Software Requirements Engineering - What Practitioners Expect to Requirements Engineering? - 弄清楚当前的软件需求工程——从业者对需求工程的期望是什么?-

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2007.57

M. I. Kamata, Ai Yoshimoto Yoshida, Hisashi Yoshida, Nao Aoki

引用次数: 8

Reducing Unnecessary Conservativeness in Access Rights Analysis with String Analysis 利用字符串分析减少访问权限分析中不必要的保守性

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2007.80

Mika Koganeyama, Naoshi Tabuchi, T. Tateishi

引用次数: 1

Incentive Compatible Mechanisms for Group Ticket Allocation in Software Maintenance Services 软件维护服务中团体票分配的激励兼容机制

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/ASPEC.2007.65

Karthik Subbian, R. Kannan, R. K. Gautam, Y. Narahari

{"title":"Incentive Compatible Mechanisms for Group Ticket Allocation in Software Maintenance Services","authors":"Karthik Subbian, R. Kannan, R. K. Gautam, Y. Narahari","doi":"10.1109/ASPEC.2007.65","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPEC.2007.65","url":null,"abstract":"A customer reported problem (or trouble ticket) in software maintenance is typically solved by one or more maintenance engineers. The decision of allocating the ticket to one or more engineers is generally taken by the lead, based on customer delivery deadlines and a guided complexity assessment from each maintenance engineer. The key challenge in such a scenario is two folds, un-truthful (hiked up) elicitation of ticket complexity by each engineer to the lead and the decision of allocating the ticket to a group of engineers who will solve the ticket with in customer deadline. The decision of allocation should ensure individual and coalitional rationality along with coalitional stability. In this paper we use game theory to examine the issue of truthful elicitation of ticket complexities by engineers for solving ticket as a group given a specific customer delivery deadline. We formulate this problem as strategic form game and propose two mechanisms, (1) division of labor (DOL) and (2) extended second price (ESP). In the proposed mechanisms we show that truth telling by each engineer constitutes a dominant strategy Nash equilibrium of the underlying game. Also we analyze the existence of individual rationality (IR) and coalitional rationality (CR) properties to motivate voluntary and group participation. We use Core, solution concept from co-operative game theory to analyze the stability of the proposed group based on the allocation and payments.","PeriodicalId":273688,"journal":{"name":"14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127917249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Project Management Practices on Building Management Information System in IBM Global Business Service IBM全球业务服务中建筑管理信息系统的项目管理实践

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2007.76

Yi Wang, Huihui Shi

引用次数: 0

Evaluating Product Line Architectures: Methods and Techniques 评估产品线架构:方法和技术

14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07) Pub Date : 2007-12-04 DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2007.51

M. Babar

{"title":"Evaluating Product Line Architectures: Methods and Techniques","authors":"M. Babar","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2007.51","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2007.51","url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Good software architecture is one of the key factors in successfully developing and evolving a system or a family of systems. Software architecture provides the key framework for the earliest design decisions taken to achieve functional and quality requirements. In addition, it has a profound influence on project organizations' functioning and structure. Poor architecture usually results in project inefficiencies, poor communication, and poor decision making. Software architecture for a family of systems also helps identify the commonality among different systems and explicitly document variability. Since software architecture plays a significant role in the life of a system, it is important to evaluate a system's architecture as early as possible. Architecture evaluation is considered one of the most important and effective techniques of addressing quality related issues at the software architecture level and mitigating architectural risks. Moreover, architecture evaluation sessions are an effective means of sharing and capturing architecture design rationale, reasoning behind architecture design decisions. This tutorial highlights the benefits and challenges in evaluating software architectures. It discusses theoretical and practical concepts underpinning some of the well-known scenario-based architecture evaluation methods and various approaches to characterize quality attributes using scenarios. The use of the presented methods, techniques, and tools will be demonstrated with a case study based on an industrial project.","PeriodicalId":273688,"journal":{"name":"14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'07)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130958872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7