发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Contractual reliance damages 合同信赖损害赔偿
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0009
A. Burrows
{"title":"Contractual reliance damages","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"The term ‘reliance interest’ was coined by Fuller and Perdue, whose classic article ‘The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages’ first clarified and explored the different possible objectives of damages for breach of contract. The aim of damages protecting the reliance interest is, according to Fuller and Perdue, ‘… to put the plaintiff in as good a position as he was in before the promise was made’. This can alternatively and preferably be expressed as aiming to put the claimant into as good a position as she would have been in if no contract had been made.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115672560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Compensating advantages 补偿的优点
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0011
A. Burrows
{"title":"Compensating advantages","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0011","url":null,"abstract":"The compensatory aims require the courts to assess not only the position the claimant would have been in if the breach of contract or tort had not been committed but also its actual position as a result of the tort or breach of contract, so that damages can make up the difference. Where the claimant’s actual position has been, or will be, improved by benefits acquired subsequent to and as a result of the tort or breach of contract, one might expect (in accordance with the compensatory aims) that such benefits would be taken into account—if they are ignored the claimant will be left in a better position than if the contract had been performed or if no tort had been committed. In a nutshell, one might expect ‘compensating advantages’ to be deducted or, as it is sometimes alternatively expressed, that losses mitigated would not be compensated. But in fact compensating advantages are often not deducted. Our concern here is to indicate when this is so.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134324093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Losses on death 死亡损失
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0016
A. Burrows
{"title":"Losses on death","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0016","url":null,"abstract":"At common law no action could be brought for loss suffered through the killing of another. But this was altered by the Fatal Accidents Acts 1846–1959, now the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) (as amended by the Administration of Justice Act 1982, s 3) which gives a statutory action ‘… if death is caused by any wrongful act, neglect or default …’ Most such statutory actions are founded on a tort by the defendant but the basis may be breach of contract.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114449892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delivery up 交付了
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0031
A. Burrows
{"title":"Delivery up","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0031","url":null,"abstract":"This is the appropriate remedy for the claimant to recover its goods where the defendant is tortiously ‘interfering’ with them under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977. By the remedy the defendant is ordered to deliver the goods to, or to allow them to be taken by, the claimant. Delivery up therefore belongs alongside the mandatory restorative injunction as a remedy concerned to compel the undoing of a wrong.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125681898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remedies for equitable wrongs 衡平法错误的救济
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0035
A. Burrows
{"title":"Remedies for equitable wrongs","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0035","url":null,"abstract":"Torts and breach of contract are termed common law wrongs because they were historically developed in the common law courts. Equitable wrongs are civil wrongs that historically were developed in the Court of Chancery. Despite the fusion of the common law courts and the Court of Chancery by the Supreme Court of Judicature Acts 1873–1875, much of the substantive law has not been fused. One example is the continued distinction between common law and equitable wrongs. In a rational fused system, nothing should turn on whether a civil wrong is common law or equitable. But that is not the present law.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127715601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Loss of reputation 名誉损失
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0017
A. Burrows
{"title":"Loss of reputation","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0017","url":null,"abstract":"Loss of reputation is a non-pecuniary loss, which is traditionally regarded as distinct from mental distress in that it deals with society’s feelings towards the claimant, rather than with the claimant’s own feelings. But often mental distress consequent on loss of reputation is not clearly separated from the award for loss of reputation itself. Indeed on an alternative view, alternative to that traditionally taken by the courts, all non-pecuniary loss, including loss of reputation, is ultimately regarded as a loss only in terms of the distress or loss of happiness caused to the claimant. However, where a claimant complains of a loss of reputation she is generally concerned not only about loss of reputation itself, but also and often primarily about the pecuniary loss flowing from it and both will be considered.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129859964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nominal and contemptuous damages and declarations 名义上和藐视法庭的损害赔偿和声明
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0033
A. Burrows
{"title":"Nominal and contemptuous damages and declarations","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0033","url":null,"abstract":"Many torts are actionable only on proof of damage. But torts actionable per se, as well as breach of contract, are actionable without proof of damage. One consequence is that even though the court is satisfied that the claimant has not suffered any damage, it is still entitled to damages for the defendant’s breach of contract or tort actionable per se. Such damages are termed nominal and they comprise a trivial sum of money, usually about £2–£10. Nominal damages are therefore in no sense compensatory and must be distinguished from a small sum of compensatory damages. Their function is merely to declare that the defendant has committed a wrong against the claimant and hence that the claimant’s rights have been infringed. Given that the remedy of a declaration is specifically designed to serve this purpose, nominal damages are superfluous and could happily be abolished. This is particularly so since what was previously an important practical consequence of an award of nominal damages has been removed by Devlin J’s decision in Anglo-Cyprian Trade Agencies v Paphos Wine Industries Ltd that a claimant awarded nominal damages should not necessarily be regarded as a successful claimant for the purposes of costs.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130066867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Principles limiting compensatory damages 限制补偿性损害的原则
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780198705932.003.0010
A. Burrows
{"title":"Principles limiting compensatory damages","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198705932.003.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198705932.003.0010","url":null,"abstract":"There can be said to be five principles limiting compensatory damages (ie which reduce the damages that full adherence to the compensatory aims would dictate) for both torts and breach of contract, and the role played by each can be briefly described as follows: The principal tests for remoteness centre on reasonable foreseeability or contemplation of the loss.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126832780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interest as damages and interest on damages 损害赔偿利息和损害赔偿利息
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0020
A. Burrows
{"title":"Interest as damages and interest on damages","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0020","url":null,"abstract":"The law on interest in English law is a tangled web. This is principally because the common law traditionally set itself against awards of interest and this has resulted in the piecemeal intervention of statutes which allow the award of interest in specific situations. In the leading modern case of Sempra Metals Ltd v IRC the House of Lords reformed the common law as regards awards of interest as compensatory damages for a tort or breach of contract (although the part of the decision that was concerned with interest as restitution of an unjust enrichment, which was the direct claim in question, was overruled by the Supreme Court in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v HMRC). Sempra Metals was concerned with an award of compound interest (as damages or as restitution) which contrasts with the relevant statutes which allow awards of simple interest only.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133612207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factual causation 事实因果关系
Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0007
A. Burrows
{"title":"Factual causation","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"A requirement that can be regarded as inherent in the compensatory aims is that the defendant’s tort or breach of contract has been a cause of the claimant’s loss. So the words, ‘… as if the tort or breach of contract had not been committed’ correlate to the usual ‘but for’ or sine qua non test of factual causation; that is, the claimant must establish that but for the tort or breach of contract she would not have suffered the loss.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121518406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信