10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice最新文献_第2页

The importance of life cycle modeling to defect detection and prevention 生命周期建模对缺陷检测和预防的重要性

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267624

J. Moll, J. Jacobs, B. Freimut, J. Trienekens, F. Coallier, P. Hoffnagle, P. Layzell, Liam O'Brien, D. Poo

{"title":"The importance of life cycle modeling to defect detection and prevention","authors":"J. Moll, J. Jacobs, B. Freimut, J. Trienekens, F. Coallier, P. Hoffnagle, P. Layzell, Liam O'Brien, D. Poo","doi":"10.1109/STEP.2002.1267624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2002.1267624","url":null,"abstract":"In many low mature organizations dynamic testing is often the only defect detection method applied. Thus, defects are detected rather late in the development process. High rework and testing effort, typically under time pressure, lead to unpredictable delivery dates and uncertain product quality. This paper presents several methods for early defect detection and prevention that have been in existence for quite some time, although not all of them are common practice. However, to use these methods operationally and scale them to a particular project or environment, they have to be positioned appropriately in the life cycle, especially in complex projects. Modeling the development life cycle, that is the construction of a project-specific life cycle, is an indispensable first step to recognize possible defect injection points throughout the development project and to optimize the application of the available methods for defect detection and prevention. This paper discusses the importance of life cycle modeling for defect detection and prevention and presents a set of concrete, proven methods that can be used to optimize defect detection and prevention. In particular, software inspections, static code analysis, defect measurement and defect causal analysis are discussed. These methods allow early, low cost detection of defects, preventing them from propagating to later development stages and preventing the occurrence of similar defects in future projects.","PeriodicalId":271935,"journal":{"name":"10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131242979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 25

Improvements to the Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) and to the Software Engineering Education Body of Knowledge (SEEK) 软件工程知识体系指南(SWEBOK)和软件工程教育知识体系指南(SEEK)的改进

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267594

P. Bourque, T. Lethbridge

引用次数: 3

Mining and managing software assets 挖掘和管理软件资产

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267614

L. O'Brien, F. Hansen, R. Seacord, D. Smith

{"title":"Mining and managing software assets","authors":"L. O'Brien, F. Hansen, R. Seacord, D. Smith","doi":"10.1109/STEP.2002.1267614","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2002.1267614","url":null,"abstract":"Mining and managing software assets are important for strategic reuse of assets in new systems. This report outlines the SEI's Options Analysis for Reengineering (OAR) method, which is an approach for mining components and discusses component repositories and in particular the SEI's Knowledge-Based Automated Component Ensemble Evaluation (K-BACEE). OAR is a systematic, architecture-centric method for mining existing components for a product line or new software architecture. The method incorporates a set of scalable techniques and activities to collaboratively analyze existing components, determine viable mining options, and evaluate the most promising options. Once mined, software assets need to be managed to be useful. Compatibility with other legacy assets, commercial-off-the-shelf software products, and other software components needs to be understood and codified in such a way that it can be easily shared with other development projects within the organization. Towards this end, the SEI has developed K-BACEE which is a component repository that uses codified integration knowledge to assist system integrators in selecting ensembles of highly compatible components.","PeriodicalId":271935,"journal":{"name":"10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129558560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

STEP 2002 - a roadmap for empirical software engineering STEP 2002 -经验软件工程的路线图

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267629

D. Budgen, S. Tilley

引用次数: 0

Empirical software engineering: a roadmap report from a workshop held at STEP 2002, Montreal, October 2002 经验软件工程:来自STEP 2002, Montreal, 2002年10月举行的研讨会的路线图报告

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267630

D. Budgen, G. Hoffnagle, M. Muller, F. Robert, A. Sellami, S. Tilley

{"title":"Empirical software engineering: a roadmap report from a workshop held at STEP 2002, Montreal, October 2002","authors":"D. Budgen, G. Hoffnagle, M. Muller, F. Robert, A. Sellami, S. Tilley","doi":"10.1109/STEP.2002.1267630","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2002.1267630","url":null,"abstract":"The growing awareness of the need to employ evidence-based arguments to support the practices of software engineering, rather than arguments based upon advocacy, has led to a growing interest in the related area of empirical practices. This workshop, held at STEP 2002, set out to address two questions. What techniques do we need for empirical software engineering? What are the 'grand challenges' that empirical software engineering should be addressing as a matter of priority? For practical reasons, these were addressed in reverse order, and we began by identifying what each participant saw as being the challenges facing the wider acceptance and use of empirical techniques in software engineering. We then classified and grouped the challenges so identified under the three headings of resource, technical, and strategic. The next step involved examining how the particular challenges could be addressed, what proposals for action we would put forward, and how these proposals might be followed up. A core element we identified was the need to provide some form of centralized resource (such as a Web site) that could support both research and teaching. In this paper we outline the role that such a site could have, and also identify some of the elements that are likely to be needed in any educational module that addresses this topic.","PeriodicalId":271935,"journal":{"name":"10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116201967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Organizing for software product line engineering 组织软件产品线工程

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267601

M. Mannion

引用次数: 11

Interdisciplinary influences in software engineering practices 软件工程实践中的跨学科影响

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267604

R. Bunting, F. Coallier, G. Lewis

引用次数: 3

A roadmap for enterprise integration 企业集成的路线图

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267618

D. Smith, L. O'Brien, M. Barbacci, F. Coallier

引用次数: 23

Semantic modeling for school information system (SIS) 面向学校信息系统的语义建模

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267620

Ibrahim Mohamed, S. Mansor

引用次数: 2

STEP2002: advances and opportunities in software engineering practice STEP2002:软件工程实践中的进步与机遇

10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2002-10-06 DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2002.1267593

F. Coallier, G. Hoffnagle, P. Layzell, L. O'Brien, D. Poo

引用次数: 0