{"title":"Kepemilikan Tanah Adat Suatu Kajian Pada Masyarakat Hukum Adat Tidore (Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Folarora, Kecamatan Tidore, Kota Tidore Kepulauan)","authors":"Nurizka Arlina","doi":"10.33387/DEJURE.V2I1.3034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33387/DEJURE.V2I1.3034","url":null,"abstract":"Territorial unity (land) as one of the elements froming a customary law community, is one of the important elements related to certain regulations in terms of ownership, control and management as well as the process of transfering. This often creates problems, such as what happened on Tidore Island as the central area of the Tidore Sultanate. Hale Gimalaha, which was the land given by the holder of GimalahaTomayouin the Government Structure of Tidore Sultanate, turned out to be a certificate of ownership by one of the GimalahaTomayou. The status of customary land which is converted into ownership rights will be the mainfocus of this research. The method used is socio-legal research using primary data through in-depth interviews with competent parties and the community in Folarora Village, Tidore District, Tidore Islands City, as well as historical and sociological descriptions. So it can be concluded that the main obstacle if problems arise with regard to customary land lies in evidence. Customary land ownership in the Tidore customary law community generally doesn’t have a written (formal) proof of ownership. Communities in obtaining ownership rights over customary land in accordance with applicable customary rules and based on information from simo-simo. The problem with the Hale Gimalaha, thatGimalahaTomayoumade a certificate of ownership, so there is an alternative solution through the Imperial Court Institution or internal root by GimalahaTomayou. These problems lasted for a long time and occurred among the generations of GimalahaTomayou, eventually reluctance to resolve the conflict because people believed a magical imbalance would arise when the problems that had first returned to the surface.","PeriodicalId":262141,"journal":{"name":"de Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114920940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Eksistensi Penerapan Ultimum Remedium dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia","authors":"Sheila Maulida Fitri","doi":"10.33387/DEJURE.V2I1.2688","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33387/DEJURE.V2I1.2688","url":null,"abstract":"Criminal Law in Indonesia which was ideally applied as the ultimate last weapon (ultimum remedium) in dealing with violations, has now shifted to become the main weapon (primum remedium). This is inseparable from the criminal law policy which is still oriented as a form of retaliation and punishment so that it prioritizes penal policies with a focus on imposing sanctions in the form of deprivation of liberty. Criminal law has always been used as the main weapon in solving various kinds of violations. This has led to a condition of over-criminalization which has created new problems at the applicative level. Reforming criminal law is considered very urgent to be carried out by accommodating a restorative justice approach in order to re-place criminal law as an ultimum remedium. First, the application of decriminalization policies in various laws and regulations in Indonesia. Second, the reorientation of the criminal procedural law system which gives the possibility of a criminal case settlement process out of court (afdoening buiten process). Keyword: Criminal Law; Restorative Justice; Ultimum Remedium.","PeriodicalId":262141,"journal":{"name":"de Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114436048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Harmonisasi Hukum Pidana Adat Masyarakat Baduy dengan Hukum Pidana Nasional (RUU KUHP)","authors":"M. Al Arif F","doi":"10.33387/dejure.v1i2.1913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33387/dejure.v1i2.1913","url":null,"abstract":"Hukum adat terutama hukum pidana adat harus dijadikan sebagai pondasi dasar dalam pembentukan hukum pidana nasional. Karena dalam hukum pidana adat mengandung nilai-nilai yang dapat menjiwai hukum pidana nasional diantara hukum pidana adat itu dan masih eksis sampai saat ini yaitu hukum pidana adat masyarakat Baduy. Walaupun tidak semua sama dan pasti ada perbendaan maka harus dilakukan upaya untuk mengharmonisasikan sehingga hukum pidana nasional dan hukum pidana adat bisa saling melengkapi.Oleh karena itu hukum pidana adat secara holistik menjiwai seluruh lapisan ilmu hukum dalam praktek hukum sehingga eksistensi dari dimensi ilmu hukum maka hakikatnya hukum pidana adat tidak diragukan kapabilitasnya sebagai karakteristik hukum di Indonesia","PeriodicalId":262141,"journal":{"name":"de Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131708618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}