Multiple Criteria Decision Making最新文献_第3页

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-7414-3_2

Gholamreza Haseli, Reza Sheikh

引用次数: 7

Differences between jurors in classical music competitions: the MCDM and Network Theory approaches 古典音乐比赛评委的差异:MCDM和网络理论的方法

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.22367/mcdm.2019.14.06

H. Sosnowska, Paweł Zawiślak

{"title":"Differences between jurors in classical music competitions: the MCDM and Network Theory approaches","authors":"H. Sosnowska, Paweł Zawiślak","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2019.14.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22367/mcdm.2019.14.06","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the voting in two of the major international classical music competitions, which were held recently, viz. the International Henryk Wieniawski Violin Competition and the International Chopin Piano Competition, as well as the hypothesis, raised in some media reports, that there were juror cliques in the Wieniawski Competition. Network theory is used to compare the rankings of the two Chopin competitions. Jurors are nodes and they are linked if the correlation between the ordered list of competitors, as measured by the Kendall rank correlation coefficient, exceeds a given threshold value. The obtained networks were found linked in the case of the Chopin Competition, but disconnected in the case of the Wieniawski Competition. The results indicate that there may have been cliques in the Wieniawski Competition, but not in the Chopin Competition. The problem can be descibed in MCDM terminology by labelling the contestants ’variants’ and the jurors (or, more precisely, their musical preferences) – ’criteria’. The similarity of any two criteria is measured by correlating the orders of the alternatives (i.e. variants) that * SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Economics, Warsaw, Poland, e-mail: honorata@sgh.waw.pl, ORCID: 0000-0001-8249-2368. ** SGHWarsaw School of Economics, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Economics, Warsaw, Poland, e-mail: pzawis@sgh.waw.pl, ORCID: 0000-0002-5297-7644. 94 H. Sosnowska, P. Zawiślak result from applying them. The problem of juror cliques is thereby transformed into one of finding groups of criteria that are similar in the case of these variants.","PeriodicalId":259350,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130984906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Extended choice functionals - a cardinal framework for the analysis of choice under risk 扩展选择功能-分析风险下选择的基本框架

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.22367/mcdm.2020.15.04

S. Lahiri

{"title":"Extended choice functionals - a cardinal framework for the analysis of choice under risk","authors":"S. Lahiri","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2020.15.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22367/mcdm.2020.15.04","url":null,"abstract":"We propose a framework that extends the one developed by Professor Amartya Sen (with Arrowian roots), for the analysis of choice under risk by an individual, hereafter referred to as a decision maker. The framework is based on the decision maker’s state dependent numerical evaluations − referred to as utility, worth, or pay-off − of the alternatives. We provide several examples to illustrate meaningful possibilities in the model proposed here. The expected utility choice functional assigns to each given state- -dependent data profile (i.e., a pair consisting of a profile of state-dependent evaluation functions and a probability distribution over states of nature) the non-empty set of alternatives obtained by maximizing expected utility. A significant result in this paper, which illustrates the workability of our frameworks of analysis, is an axiomatic characterization of the expected utility choice functional using purely combinatorial techniques. Aim/Purpose: To use a minor extension of the Arrow-Sen model of social choice theory to study individual decision making/aiding under risk and with state dependent evaluation functions. Methodology: Combinatorics (theory of finite sets). Findings: Plausible decision-aids for decision making under uncertainty with state dependent evaluation functions. Research Implications: Exactly same model and results apply for the study of “weighted” multi-criteria decision making/aiding with state dependent evaluation functions. Contribution: Apart from useful decision-aids for managerial decision making under risk and operations research, we provide an axiomatic characterization of the expected utility choice functional. Keywords: risk, state-dependent evaluation, extended choice functionals.","PeriodicalId":259350,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133457186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Putting SIMUS to Work 让SIMUS发挥作用

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-82347-4_5

N. Munier

引用次数: 0

Brown–Gibson Model as a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Method: Theoretical and Mathematical Formulations, Literature Review, and Applications 作为多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法的Brown-Gibson模型:理论和数学公式、文献综述和应用

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-7414-3_9

Nasser Yimen, T. Tchotang, Abraham Kanmogne, Yungho Adamu, Fombe Lawrence Fon, M. Dagbasi

引用次数: 1

Bipolar Multicriteria Aggregation-Disaggregation Robustness Approach: Theory and Application on European e-Government Benchmarking 双极多标准聚合-分解鲁棒性方法:欧洲电子政务基准的理论与应用

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-7414-3_7

E. Siskos, Giannis Kourousias, Y. Siskos

引用次数: 0

Interpretation of Multicriteria Decision Making Models with Interacting Criteria 具有相互作用准则的多准则决策模型的解释

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11482-4_6

M. Grabisch, C. Labreuche

引用次数: 1

MIVES: A Multi-Attribute Value Function-Based Methodology for Sustainability Assessment MIVES:一种基于多属性值函数的可持续性评估方法

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-7414-3_1

Divyajyoti Biswal, Saurabh N. Joglekar, S. Mandavgane

引用次数: 1

Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Development 可持续发展的多准则决策

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89277-7

引用次数: 2

An intuitionistic fuzzy extension of the CODAS-SORT method CODAS-SORT方法的直觉模糊扩展

Multiple Criteria Decision Making Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.22367/mcdm.2021.16.06

Abir Ouhibi, H. Frikha

引用次数: 0