{"title":"The Evolution of the European Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications","authors":"J. Bauer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2509899","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2509899","url":null,"abstract":"The paper reviews the historical transformation of the European regulatory framework for electronic communications from the era dominated by state-owned enterprises to the presence of regulated competition. In the course of these developments, the vision of the roles of the public and private sectors in electronic communications changed in expected and unexpected ways. While the period is characterized by a shift toward less direct state intervention, the intensity of regulation has increased in many areas. Most recently, in the wake of the financial crisis, new forms of state intervention can be observed, including public investment in communications infrastructure and public-private partnerships. As a result of the reforms, Europe has been able to achieve major successes but it also suffered unanticipated setbacks compared to other regions. The European Union emerged as the global leader in mobile communications during the 1990s and was able to roll-out first-generation broadband access networks more rapidly than many of its peers. Recently, however, Europe as a whole has not performed as well in deploying next-generation networks and advanced mobile communications services. The paper offers a political-economic explanation for these developments and assesses their effects on the performance of the European electronic communications sector and the economy. From this analysis, the European model emerges as a unique institutional arrangement with peculiar advantages and disadvantages. Once these are recognized, sensible next steps to build the strengths while avoiding the weaknesses of the model can be seen more clearly.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124277345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Establishing State Responsibility for Historical Injustices: The Armenian Case","authors":"Marco Roscini","doi":"10.1163/15718123-01401010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01401010","url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to identify a legal structure for the determination of state responsibility for historical injustices by using the deportations and mass killings of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire (1915-1916) as a case study. It first determines whether the conduct was unlawful at the time it was committed and concludes that the 1948 Genocide Convention cannot be applied retroactively to the events in question and that customary international law provided, at the time, that the treatment by a state of its subjects was within its domestic jurisdiction. The Ottoman Empire, however, breached a series of treaties that provided for the amelioration of the conditions and for the protection of Christian minorities in the empire. The article then discusses whether the conduct was attributable to the state under the law of state responsibility in force at the time of the commissi delicti and argues that while the conduct of the Ottoman ministers, local authorities, and the military can be attributed to the Ottoman Empire, the attribution of the actions of other entities and individuals involved in the killings is more problematic.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127764648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Моделирование Структуры Коррупции (Modeling of the Structure of Corruption)","authors":"Danil Fedorovykh, M. Levin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2360797","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2360797","url":null,"abstract":"Russian Abstract: Данная работа представляет собой обзор и анализ основных концепций и подходов к исследованию взаимосвязи структурных особенностей статических и динамических структур коррупционных отношений.В разделе 1 рассматриваются посредники как элементы структуры коррупции (посредники в очередях, «легальные» посредники, посредники в международной коррупции, недобросовестные посредники), их судебное преследование, коррупционный контракт и коррупционные цепочки. Кроме того, обсуждаются несколько моделей коррупции, в том числе симуляционная модель «искусственного общества» и модель «дилеммы взяткодателя».Раздел 2 носит название «Политическая коррупция и федерализм». Он посвящен обзору истории коррупции в постсоветской России. Последовательно рассматриваются меры, принимавшиеся разными правительствами на этом пути.English Abstract: This paper presents an overview and analysis of the basic concepts and approaches to the study of the relationship of structural features of the static and dynamic structures of corruption relations.Section 1 discusses the mediators as structural elements of corruption (intermediaries in queues, \"legal\" mediators, mediators in international corruption, unscrupulous middlemen), their prosecution, contract corruption and corruption chain. Also discussed are several models of corruption, including a simulation model of an \"artificial society\" model \"dilemma briber.\" Section 2 is called \"Political corruption and federalism.\" He is devoted to reviewing the history of corruption in post-Soviet Russia. Consistently considered the measures taken by various governments in this way.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130434692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction to Law and Economics","authors":"Kalpana Tyagi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2330251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2330251","url":null,"abstract":"The present paper is an introductory paper to the emerging field of law & economics. The paper seeks to define the scope of economic analysis of law; what are the goals of bringing the two disciplines of law and economics together; what is the criterion for measuring efficiency; beginning from the neo-classical approach to the present day discussion on behavioural approach, how did law and economics emerge as a discipline and what is the future of economic analysis of law. This paper is first part of the book on Economic Analysis of Law. Subsequent chapters discuss issues such as game theory, the microeconomic and some basic mathematical principles employed in law and economics.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122723232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Creation Stories: Myths About the Origins of Money","authors":"Christine A. Desan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2252074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2252074","url":null,"abstract":"A myth about the origins of money has long organized modern approaches to the medium. According to that creation story, money is the natural product of human exchange. It can be analogized to a commodity like silver that comes to hand out of the decentralized activity of trading or a convention like language that arises out of a consensus about the value of an item. But if we consider clues about money’s origins and extrapolate from its continuing practice, another story comes into focus. It suggests that money is a constitutional project, a mode of governance for a material world. Money is a means of mobilizing resources across a collective, one created when people advance in-kind value to a stakeholder in return for a unit that represents that advance. The process both entails material value – the advance to the stakeholder is real – and converts it into a form that everyone else recognizes – the advance holds independent value because it offers a countable measure that can be transferred to make final payments. Money creation tied to a fiscal backbone can be expanded in response to the demand for cash: that practice accords both with modern economic theory and the English medieval history that furnishes the setting here. In contrast to the dominating myths about money, the “stakeholder” creation story explains how each of money’s functions is institutionalized and how that activity shapes “the market” that is made by money.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"38 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126250713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From a Global Informatics Order to Informatics for Development: The Rise and Fall of the Intergovernmental Bureau for Informatics","authors":"Julia Pohle","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2827639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827639","url":null,"abstract":"Based on a critical analysis of archival material and interviews, the paper redraws the little known history of the Intergovernmental Bureau for Informatics (IBI) and its role in the early international debate on digital technology. The organisation was created in the early 1960s and eventually ceased to exist in 1987, in a moment when computer technology became increasingly important as a means for communication. The paper shows how informatics and digital technology moved from a matter of little political disagreement to a highly politicized subject, increasingly linked to questions of national sovereignty and transnational dependence. Besides this political dimension of early debates on ICTs, the paper more generally underlines how the issue of access slowly moved from gaps in the implementation of national computer infrastructures to a wider debate on the informatization of society as a whole. It demonstrates how the initial techno-deterministic perspective on informatics evolved into a more societal perspective on information, leading to a new development paradigm around ICTs, where the dissemination of technology is not an end in itself, but an instrument to foster human exchanges. This perception paved the way for an alternative discourse on ICTs, which we could witness during the civil society involvement at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) and in other recent debates on communication and Internet policies.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124853296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An Iron Mind in an Iron Body: Lord Kames and His Principles of Equity","authors":"D. Carr","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2282735","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2282735","url":null,"abstract":"Henry Home - better known by his judicial title Lord Kames - was an important figure in enlightenment Scotland. Kames published many books and essays across a variety of fields of knowledge. A substantial number of his publications related to his vocation as an advocate, and later a judge, in Scotland. This paper provides an introduction to Lord Kames' rich legal life, particularly the way it was shaped by his experience as a Scottish lawyer in eighteenth-century Edinburgh. The paper is an introduction to a reprint of the third edition of the Principles of Equity, part of the Old Studies in Scots Law series, published by the Edinburgh Legal Education Trust. One of Kames' most important legal works, the Principles of Equity subsequently achieved \"institutional\" status, that is to say it represents a formal source of law in Scotland. The Principles was the first systematic monograph treatment of equity in English, and contains a sophisticated analysis of the interaction of equity and common law in the abstract, and in relation to Scots law particularly. The paper considers Kames' historically informed account of an evolutionary development of equity, and its underlying justificatory premises, as set out in the Principles. The paper considers how lawyers, and others, in both Scotland and America, cited the Principles in reported cases and doctrinal writing, and how Kames' influence can be sketched through his legal and non-legal works. The final section of the paper considers Kames' subsequent reputation, noting the fluctuating respect accorded to Kames' works, including the Principles, by lawyers. The paper concludes that the on-going development of the meaning and relevance of institutional works in Scotland suggests that a renewed interest in Kames' critical approach is possible.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114464315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Relevance of African Culture in Building Modern Institutions and the Quest for Legal Pluralism","authors":"S. Abebe","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2672362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2672362","url":null,"abstract":"In light of the continued debate on the relevance and compatibility of traditional institutions to the modern state institutions in Africa, this Article attempts to highlight the significance of traditional institutions to improving governance in Africa and to prospects for improving the democratic features of traditional institutions to meet the demands of modern institutional development. The Article in particular argues that dismissing the relevance of traditional institutions by claiming they are incompatible to modern institutional values is not only inaccurate, but it also may further alienate the role of traditional institutions in Africa. The Article addresses divergent issues that help put the issue in perspective. The Article consists of three parts. Part I of the Article discuses the debate on the universalist versus relativist approach in relation to democratic and human rights principles and the impact of the ongoing debate on the nature of governance needed in Africa. Part II of the Article continues to highlight the features of African traditional institutions that have wider relevance to the principles of modern democracy. The last Part of the Article argues for the emergence of a system of legal pluralism whereby the formal and informal institutions flourish side-by-side until the informal systems are gradually integrated into the formal institutional system.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114923511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Legacy of Classical Natural Law in Russian Dogmatic Jurisprudence in the Late 19th Century","authors":"D. Poldnikov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2286103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2286103","url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the inconspicuous influence of the legacy of the classical natural law of the 18th century on Russian dogmatic jurisprudence of civil law, taking as an example the authoritative “Course on civil law” (1868-1880) by Konstantin Pobedonostsev. Despite the dogmatic purpose of the course and the hostility of its author towards European liberal doctrines of natural law, some striking similarities between them can be found, especially in the general provisions and principles of contract law, the method of its exposition and the recourse to justice and supra-positive ideal","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"371 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114075915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Arguments from Natural Law Reevaluated Through a Dialogue between Legal History and Legal Theory","authors":"D. Poldnikov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2257754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2257754","url":null,"abstract":"The paper suggests several ways to rediscover the legacy of early modern and classical natural law of the 18th century in contemporary legal thought through the joint efforts of legal history and legal theory with particular reference to the domain of contract law. Additionally, the paper justifies the revival of the research in the domain of natural law in connection with legal argumentation","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129313733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}