{"title":"MOVING BEYOND THE ABYSSAL LINE: THE POSSIBILITY OF EPISTEMIC JUSTICE IN THE ‘POST’- APARTHEID CONSTITUTIONALISM","authors":"Lilandi Niemand","doi":"10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4514","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I reflect on the idea of a ‘post’-apartheid South Africanconstitutionalism and the related and implicated notion ofTransformative Constitutionalism by emphasising its continued bondageto a colonial and apartheid past. In an effort to critically explore the‘post’-apartheid transformative constitutional framework, I examinethe endurance of colonialism as coloniality in the manner it hasunfolded in the South African context. This exploration involveshighlighting three constitutive elements of this endurance: linearhistoricism as observed in Hobbes’ social contract; the geography ofreason as theorised by Schmitt; and the lines within South Africansociety and knowledge systems as a result of what De Sousa Santos calls‘abyssal thinking’. Although the endurance of historical colonialism ascoloniality can be described in a number of ways, I deal with thesespecific constitutive elements in order to argue that the doctrine of transformation, which includes Transformative Constitutionalism, haslargely been ineffective in its attempt to eradicate coloniality as it hasfailed to achieve epistemic justice for the majority of (South) Africans.I conclude by suggesting that the doctrine of transformation and, assuch, Transformative Constitutionalism has served to further excludeand marginalise the knowledge of indigenous (South) African people inthe ‘post’-apartheid constitutional dispensation. The project oftransformation has sustained the abyssal line as it has been internalisedthrough coloniality. As such, the ‘post’-apartheid South Africandispensation remains divided by this line — essentially discardingindigenous (South) African people and their knowledge systems to theabyss. I further argue that the persistence of coloniality, sustained bythe abyssal line, requires a project of conceptual decolonisation ifcoloniality and epistemic injustice is to be undone. In this sense, a true(South) African dispensation may be disclosed.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126359948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"WHAT IS IN A SURNAME? AN ENQUIRY INTO THE UNAUTHORISED NAME CHANGES OF MARRIED WOMEN","authors":"Odirile Matladi","doi":"10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4511","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years there have been reports of the Department of HomeAffairs changing women’s surnames to that of their husbands upon theconclusion of a marriage without the married women’s consent. Thisconduct by the Department of Home Affairs officials infringes, as thisarticle will argue, not only on the affected women’s right to justadministrative action but also on the rights to equality and dignity and,in some instances, freedom of movement and universal suffrage. Thisarticle enquires into the possibility of taking the conduct of theDepartment of Home Affairs, which arguably amounts to administrativeaction, on judicial review seeking systemic relief. It will look at thesexist and patriarchal social norms relied upon to justify the conduct ofthe Department of Home Affairs and calls for intervening measures thatnot only result in broader social recognition but also effectivelydismantle the systems and frameworks of inequality that continue tomarginalise and subjugate women in the socially constructed genderhierarchy.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121564292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"THE APPRAISAL OF THE ‘MARKET OVERT’ PRINCIPLE VIS-À-VIS SALE OF GOODS IN ZAMBIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NIGERIAN AND SOUTH AFRICAN COMMERCIAL LAW","authors":"Mainess Goma","doi":"10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4508","url":null,"abstract":"This article is inspired by a need to clarify and appraise the law relatingto the sale of goods with particular attention to the market overtprinciple in Zambia. This will be done by conducting a comparativestudy between Zambia, South Africa, and Nigeria. The articleinvestigates methods for constructing a preferable legal regime forindividuals and businesses, particularly economic transactions. Itfurther assesses the Zambian Sale of Goods Act of 1893 (56 & 57 Vict.c.71) as it relates to the market overt principle. I also highlightweaknesses in the current law requiring remedial action.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121455428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"THE TAXATION OF IMAGE RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA: VALIDITY OF TAX MINIMISATION SCHEMES","authors":"Leandri Kapp, C. Meyer","doi":"10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4509","url":null,"abstract":"Sport undeniably plays a major role in society today. Over the years, ithas developed into n free-standing industry and its players have becomeincreasingly valuable and earn income both on and off the field. Thisarticle addresses the income generated by sport stars off the field ofplay through the exploitation of their ‘image rights’. The use ofsomeone’s image rights can be explained as the practice ofappropriating someone’s personality. In modern society, people havebecome transfixed by sport stars. This has led to the image rights ofindividual sport stars such as Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo tobecome commodities exploited by their clubs and other third parties toenhance brand images and promote the sale of products.1 This use ofthe image rights of celebrities generates a whole new source of incomefor these sport stars. Due to the relatively high amounts of incomereceived for the use of a sport star’s image, these stars may be temptedto enter into creative schemes in an attempt to reduce high taxes leviedagainst these streams of income. The practice of the commercialexploitation of a sport star’s image rights is a relatively new development in South Africa and is not yet recognised to the same extent as in other jurisdictions, such as the UK and Spain. This article examines the existing South African sport, intellectual property, andtax laws governing image rights and specifically analyses whether SouthAfrica is sufficiently equipped, under tax legislation, to address theseminimisation schemes aimed at reducing the tax liability arising from aSouth African sport star’s image rights.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114123206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"THE DEVELOPMENT OF A WESTERN-CENTRIC NOTION OF MODERNITY AND THE INCLUSIVE RECONSTRUCTION THEREOF ACCORDING TO THE TWAIL PRINCIPLES","authors":"Makumya M'membe","doi":"10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4512","url":null,"abstract":"Modernity significantly influences global action regarding social,political, and economic justice and liberation. Because of this, itsflawed origins cannot simply be ignored. This article explains thedevelopment and current conception of economic, social and politicalmodernity and shows how non-Western thought is excluded from thesespheres. The article focuses on problematising he recent construction ofmodernity by showing how modernity is founded on Western ideals.Additionally, this article tracks the spread and universalisation ofmodernity by cruel and illegitimate means like colonialism and theothering of indigenous peoples. All these form the basis for anarguments that there must be a substantial reconstruction of theconcept of modernity, and TWAIL’s relationship with international law isoffered as inspiration for such a reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129880157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"THE ACCESSIBILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL LOWER COURTS","authors":"L. Curlewis, Delano Abdoll","doi":"10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3664","url":null,"abstract":"Although the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 guarantees everyone the right of access to courts and civil justice, many people still find themselves in a position where they cannot access the South African justice system, specifically concerning civil legal matters. While this problem has been recognised by various academics, authors, and even Constitutional Court judges, the understanding of what this right means empirically has only recently been understood in relation to South Africa’s civil justice system. This article, therefore, concentrates on the accessibility and effectiveness of South African civil courts. The focus is on civil lower courts given that most people who are exposed to the civil justice system do so by means of the Magistrates Courts only.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115165990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"CONSERVATION CRIME AND PANGOLIN POACHING: TENSIONS BETWEEN CUSTOMARY USE AND CONSERVATION LAW","authors":"N. Irving","doi":"10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3679","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author assesses the interplay between African customary use of pangolin and conservation law and to what extent the existing legislative framework undermines the heritage value of pangolins for customary communities. The author discusses the extent to which the laws governing pangolin protection in South Africa impose limitations on the customary use of pangolin for customary communities. Finally, the author considers whether customary law rights of access to and use of pangolin can or ought to coexist with conservation law. This paper aims to illustrate that the conservation laws regulating pangolin in South Africa impose excessive limitations on customary use and access to pangolin.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"385 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115480068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"SOCIAL JUSTICE AND COVID 19 IN THE 'NEW SOUTH AFRICA: INVOKING RAMOSEAN MEDITATIONS IN PANDEMIC TIMES","authors":"Ilana Le Roux","doi":"10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3654","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3654","url":null,"abstract":"In this contributory essay to the 2021 Special Section of the PSLR spotlighting ‘Social Justice and COVID-19’, I attempt to challenge portrayals of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as an ‘indiscriminate’ and ‘equal opportunity’ assailant. In doing so, I endeavour to bring to the fore a reading of social injustices experienced during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic that implicates not only systemic disadvantages inherited from apartheid but also the legacies of unjust colonial conquest. By underscoring memory as the possibility condition for restorative social justice within a progressively unjust South Africa, I draw on philosopher Mogobe Ramose’s counter-discourse meditations problematising the pervasiveness of colonial-apartheid conquest in a post-1994 liberal democratic polity. Accordingly, I align myself with perspectives that consider substantive social justice in a stratified ‘new’ South Africa to be a decolonial justice carved out by an African experience and memory, with the restoration of unjustly dispossessed land as a possibility condition for social cohesion.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127102905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MANDATORY RULE DOCTRINE AND ITS APPLICATION IN THE SOUTH AFRICAN LABOUR COURT","authors":"Elisabetta Rinaldi","doi":"10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3673","url":null,"abstract":"Inherent in any employment relationship is the imbalance of bargaining power between the parties to the employment contract. On a globalised scale, this imbalance is exacerbated where employees are often reliant on the provisions within their contract to ensure they are adequately protected. Party autonomy enables the parties to choose the legal system that will govern these provisions and the employment relationship as a whole. The doctrine of mandatory rules purports to make applicable those ‘laws of a strictly positive, imperative nature’ so as to guarantee the protection of employees’ interests where party autonomy serves to conceal the power imbalance within the employment relationship. The Labour Court has, however, often misunderstood and neglected to consider the application of private international law rules, which are inclusive of the mandatory rule doctrine. The aim of this article is, therefore, to critically analyse the doctrine and question whether, from a comparative perspective, South African labour law can be considered as fitting within this framework as developed within the European Union and the United States, so as to ensure its protective elements are applied in the appropriate instances.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"2000 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123548800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}