PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic)最新文献

A Survey on the Evolution of Keynes' Economic Thought 凯恩斯经济思想演变述评

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3903272

Barkin Cihanli

{"title":"A Survey on the Evolution of Keynes' Economic Thought","authors":"Barkin Cihanli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3903272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3903272","url":null,"abstract":"There has been on-going controversy about the evolution of John Maynard Keynes’ thought on economic theory among economists of different schools of thought. Even though Keynes have always been considered a revolutionary in economic thought in relation with his ideas in the General Theory, Keynes did not always think about the economic thought the way he did in the General Theory. Some economists have argued that Keynes’ training in economics in Cambridge had made him subscribe to the Classical economics in his earlier years. Some has furthered this argument that Keynes’ Treatise on Money (1930) contained elements of the Classical economic theory, whereas others have opposed that Keynes have dropped the Classical economic theory by the time he wrote the Treatise and seemed to be in the process of developing what later became known as the Keynesian economics. However, there remain fundamental questions to be answered : What kind of economics training did Keynes receive in his earlier years as a student? To what extent had Keynes’ thought gone through a dramatic change in the successive years? How different was his economic thought in the Treatise on Money (1930)? How different was the Treatise from the General Theory (1936)? This essay surveys that Keynes started to acknowledge the shortcomings of the Classical economic theory by the time he wrote the Treatise on Money. Later on, when he gave the inaugural Finlay lecture at UCD titled National Self-Sufficiency(1933), there were even more distinct evidence in favor of his deviation from the Classical Theory. As a result, the goal of this paper is to argue that the Treatise and the National Self-Sufficiency pieces were the two primary sources that demonstrate the evolutionary path for the production of the General Theory. This is a significant issue to address, because this argument falls in line with different interpretations of the origins of the Keynesian economics, specifically the Post Keynesian line of thought which will be analyzed in detail in this paper.","PeriodicalId":249498,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic)","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124214876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Relationship Between Capital Account Liberalization and Economic Growth: Does Doing Business Environment Matter? 资本账户自由化与经济增长的关系:营商环境重要吗?

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3918806

Zahra Dehghan Shabani, R. Shahnazi

引用次数: 1

Women Workers in the Gig Economy in India : An Exploratory Study 印度零工经济中的女工:一项探索性研究

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3944205

Institute of Economic Affairs Submitter, Anwesha Ghosh

引用次数: 4

Beyond Property or Beyond Piketty? 超越财产还是超越皮凯蒂?

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2020-11-26 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3738391

S. Reddy

引用次数: 1

A Methodological Critique of New Keynesian and DSGE Models 对新凯恩斯主义和DSGE模型的方法论批判

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2020-06-02 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3616896

Narciso Túñez Area

引用次数: 0

Capital Market Liberalization and Equity Market Interdependence 资本市场自由化与股权市场相互依存

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2020-05-28 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3612457

Renée Fry-McKibbin, Ziyu Yan

引用次数: 0

A Comment the ‘New’ History of American Capitalism 评美国资本主义的“新”史

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2019-08-17 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3438828

Phillip W. Magness

{"title":"A Comment the ‘New’ History of American Capitalism","authors":"Phillip W. Magness","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3438828","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438828","url":null,"abstract":"This essay reviews the \"New History of Capitalism\" (NHC) literature with specific attention to its claims about the relationship between capitalism and slavery. While others have critiqued severe deficiencies in the empirical dimensions of this literature, I focus upon the shortcomings in its conceptualization of \"capitalism.\" In addition to being plagued by definitional imprecision surrounding its use of the term that causes NHC scholars to conflate the slave system with laissez-faire economic doctrines, this literature generally neglects the close historical association between classical economists and abolitionism. The ensuing confusion over the intellectual history of capitalism and its relationship to the emergence of economics as a social science leads several practitioners in the NHC literature to unwittingly adopt a modern iteration of the \"King Cotton\" economic thesis that was advanced by radical pro-slavery \"fire eaters\" on the eve of the American Civil War. While the two service opposite objectives with regards to slavery itself, they are shown to adopt eerily similar diagnoses of slavery's economic position in the world. As with its Confederate-era precursor, the NHC variant of this thesis errs in its attempt to reduce the complexities of an economy to a simplistic causal relationship based upon a single slave-produced crop.","PeriodicalId":249498,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125606881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

The Brazilian Connection in Milton Friedman's 1967 Presidential Address and 1976 Nobel Lecture 米尔顿·弗里德曼1967年总统演讲和1976年诺贝尔奖演讲中的巴西关系

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2019-04-09 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3214899

M. Boianovsky

引用次数: 0

Some International Evidence for Keynesian Economics Without the Phillips Curve 没有菲利普斯曲线的凯恩斯主义经济学的一些国际证据

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2019.032

R. Farmer, Giovanni Nicolò

引用次数: 6

Economics’ Wisdom Deficit and How to Reduce It 经济学的智慧赤字及如何减少

PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic) Pub Date : 2018-11-09 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3283274

John F. Tomer

{"title":"Economics’ Wisdom Deficit and How to Reduce It","authors":"John F. Tomer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3283274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3283274","url":null,"abstract":"As is well understood, the values inherent in the dominant neoclassical economic paradigm are self-interest and optimization. These are the values that guide individuals and policymakers in advanced capitalist economies in their economic decision making. As a consequence, the economics discipline, arguably, is insufficiently oriented to helping people and organizations make wise choices, choices about what is really and truly in people’s best interests. In other words, there is strong reason to believe that economics has a wisdom deficit. This paper draws on great philosophers such as Aristotle to explain what wisdom is and why, although economics is concerned with the normative aspect of decision making, economics has too infrequently been used to help people or their societies make wise decisions. This paper is also concerned with how a society’s economic decision-making processes can be improved in order that these processes incorporate a much greater dose of wisdom. One relevant question here is: can we learn with the help of philosophers, psychologists, and organization researchers how to make economic decisions that apply the practical wisdom that Aristotle advocated? This paper’s overall purpose is first to point the way toward greater decision-making wisdom, and second to propose one method for improving the wisdom of important economic related decision making. Hopefully, this paper will serve to put the issue of decision-making wisdom higher on the agenda of economists and, as a consequence, lead to wiser decisions in the economic sphere, thereby reducing the wisdom deficit.","PeriodicalId":249498,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Liberal Market Economies (Topic)","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130730439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1