Wittgenstein and Hegel最新文献_第3页

Hegel and Wittgenstein: Elements for a Comparison 黑格尔与维特根斯坦:比较的要素

Wittgenstein and Hegel Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI: 10.1515/9783110572780-016

Valentina Balestracci

引用次数: 0

Image, Reference, and the Level Distinction 图像、参考和等级区分

Wittgenstein and Hegel Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI: 10.1515/9783110572780-023

Bruno Haas

引用次数: 0

Three Key Hypotheses regarding Hegel and Wittgenstein 关于黑格尔和维特根斯坦的三个关键假设

Wittgenstein and Hegel Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI: 10.1515/9783110572780-006

T. Rentsch

引用次数: 1

Wittgenstein, Hegel and Cognition 维特根斯坦，黑格尔与认识论

Wittgenstein and Hegel Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI: 10.1515/9783110572780-007

T. Rockmore

引用次数: 0

Particularity as Paradigm: A Wittgensteinian Reading of Hegel’s Subjective Logic 作为范式的特殊性:黑格尔主观逻辑的维特根斯坦式解读

Wittgenstein and Hegel Pub Date : 2019-02-06 DOI: 10.1515/9783110572780-026

J. Mácha

{"title":"Particularity as Paradigm: A Wittgensteinian Reading of Hegel’s Subjective Logic","authors":"J. Mácha","doi":"10.1515/9783110572780-026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572780-026","url":null,"abstract":"I provide a distinctively Wittgensteinian interpretation of Hegel’s Subjective Logic, including the parts on the concept, the judgement and the syllogism. I argue that Wittgenstein implicitly recognised the moments of universality, particularity and individuality; moreover, he was sensitive to Hegel’s crucial distinction between abstract and concrete universals. More specifically, for Wittgenstein the moment of particularity has the status of a paradigmatic sample which mediates between a universal concept and its individual instances. Thus, a concrete universal is a universal that includes every individual via its paradigmatic sample. Next, I provide a generic account of the emergence of concrete universals through a series of negations that follows the basic structure of Hegel’s judgement—“the individual is the universal”—and the syllogism—“the individual is the universal mediated by the particular”. This development is illustrated with examples from Hegel (a plant, Socrates, Caesar, a Stoic sage, Jesus) as well as from Wittgenstein (colour samples, the standard metre, works of art). I take Wittgenstein’s argument against private language as implying that we cannot do without paradigms in our epistemic practices. If the conclusion of the section “Subjectivity” in Hegel’s Science of Logic is that the moment of particularity cannot be ignored or dispensed with, then it would mean that we cannot do without paradigms in our epistemic practices: that is, that private rules are impossible.","PeriodicalId":242276,"journal":{"name":"Wittgenstein and Hegel","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122014835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Introduction: Hegel, Wittgenstein, Identity, Difference 导读:黑格尔，维特根斯坦，同一性，差异性

Wittgenstein and Hegel Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/9783110572780-004

J. Mácha

引用次数: 0