Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2023-04-15DOI: 10.1353/lev.2022.a886867
S. Lawrence
{"title":"Time and the Lover: Romeo and Juliet","authors":"S. Lawrence","doi":"10.1353/lev.2022.a886867","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lev.2022.a886867","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Levinas has little to say about Romeo and Juliet, unlike some other plays by Shakespeare, but it nevertheless reflects his philosophy. In keeping with his phenomenology of eros, the title characters form a relationship which does not extend to the third party, and instead retreat into what Levinas calls the “dual solitude” of lovers. Romeo and Juliet form a closed community which excludes the rest of the fictive world of Verona, its loyalties and its laws. They even withdraw from the temporality of their fictive world, into the atemporality of art and idolatry, frozen in the statues which their grieving parents offer to raise in their memories and in the story of which they are protagonists.","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126085134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2023-04-15DOI: 10.5840/levinas20233131
Lisa S. Starks
{"title":"Levinas’s Humanism of the Other and King Lear","authors":"Lisa S. Starks","doi":"10.5840/levinas20233131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/levinas20233131","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Levinas’s Humanism of the Other may be seen as a meditation of King Lear. His philosophy offers what a critique of traditional and modern anti-humanism urgently needs: an ethics that precedes being. It provides a necessary ethical foundation needed to investigate questions of the human and humanity that Shakespeare examines so thoroughly in this powerful tragedy. Prefiguring Levinas’s later philosophy, Shakespeare dramatizes this humanism of the other through the suffering and vulnerability of the body. Lear’s and Gloucester’s parallel journeys are both grounded in this vulnerability of the body and fragility of the mind that lead them to a humanism of the other. Moreover, the ethical good that precedes ontology, the saying, is profoundly staged through the characters of Cordelia and Edgar. This vision of King Lear, therefore, underlies and informs Levinas’s radical critique of traditional humanism and contemporary anti-humanism in his insistence on a humanism of the other.","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"75 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130955858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2023-04-15DOI: 10.1353/lev.2022.a886860
P. Atterton, S. Lawrence
{"title":"Editors’ Introduction: “Between the Bible and the Philosophers”: Shakespeare","authors":"P. Atterton, S. Lawrence","doi":"10.1353/lev.2022.a886860","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lev.2022.a886860","url":null,"abstract":"I is not clear when Levinas first read Shakespeare, but we do have some clues. The first complete translation of Shakespeare’s works into Russian, Levinas’s mother tongue, appeared between 1865 and 1868. These volumes doubtless graced the shelves of his family’s bookstore in Kovno (now Kaunas), in Lithuania, then part of the Russian empire. Kovno served as capital of one of three губернии gubernias (provinces), but also as the de facto center of Lithuanian intellectual life. The family bookstore catered to the highbrow tastes of government officials and served the needs of teachers and students at the local lycée. One also imagines that it fired the literary imagination of the young Levinas, who taught himself to read Russian at a young age. However, it would have been highly unusual for one so young, even for one as precocious as Levinas, to have read Shakespeare recreationally and self-educationally during this period (1906–1915). It probably was not until he entered the lycée in Kharkov, in Tsarist Ukraine, where his family emigrated at the beginning the Great War, or after his family’s return in 1920 to Lithuania, where Levinas attended the Hebrew lycée in Kovno, that Levinas read Shakespeare for the first time. We know that Russian gymnasiums and technical schools assigned Shakespeare.1 His gymnasium education, between the ages of eleven and seventeen, is therefore the latest point by which Levinas could have read Shakespeare for the first time, though we do not know what or how much. He certainly acknowledged Shakespeare’s influence on his early thought. In an interview broadcast on Radio France Culture in February 1981, Philippe Nemo asked Levinas what were “the first great books” he encountered, “the Bible or the philosophers?” Levinas answered by saying that he read the Bible while very young but only began to read philosophy with any seriousness at university. He proceeded, however, to volunteer a third category of great books,","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123723203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2022-11-29DOI: 10.5840/levinas20211526
Mérédith Laferté-Coutu
{"title":"Thinking Difference with Heidegger and Levinas: Truth and Justice by Rozemund Uljée (review)","authors":"Mérédith Laferté-Coutu","doi":"10.5840/levinas20211526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/levinas20211526","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p />","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121279744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2022-11-29DOI: 10.5840/levinas202211428
P. Davies
{"title":"On Being Patient (with Kant, Kierkegaard, and Levinas)","authors":"P. Davies","doi":"10.5840/levinas202211428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/levinas202211428","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Patience has generally been regarded as a virtue, but it has proved very difficult to say why it should be so. A phenomenology of patience quickly turns into ambiguity and confusion, and it does so in a way that seems to hinder any straightforward ethical evaluation of the term. Kant suggests that patience's moral status can only be recognized if it is supplemented by a less problematic virtue such as, say, courage. Kierkegaard in contrast keeps the focus on patience itself but argues that to do so we need a radical change in our conceptions of time and the self. With those changes in place, however, we can re-evaluate patience as an end rather than a means to an end. Levinas's cryptic remarks on patience and passivity can seem to cohere with this Kierkegaardian move. But by reading them in the context of his accounts of aging, the passing of time, and the despite oneself (malgré soi), this paper will argue that their real significance lies elsewhere. Even Kierkegaard's patience relies on a distinction between a bad or problematically passive patience and a good patience. Levinas consistently, and especially in Otherwise than Being, draws our attention back to that excessive, non-redeemable, and \"absolute\" passivity.1","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124133840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2022-11-29DOI: 10.5840/levinas2022101021
Brigitta Keintzel
{"title":"Dialogue as the \"Dialectic of the Soul\" or the \"Root of Ethics\"? Hegel's Legacy and Levinas's Veto","authors":"Brigitta Keintzel","doi":"10.5840/levinas2022101021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/levinas2022101021","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Neither according to Hegel nor according to Levinas is it possible to define the person independently of collectivity. For both, dialogues play a strategic role in the orientation towards the collective. For Hegel, the \"good conscience\" is significant because it is a reference for describing the assumptions, and the results of a dialogue. I describe these implications in my first section. In the second section, I present Levinas's objections to the \"good conscience.\" Instead of a \"good conscience,\" for Levinas, conscience is an instance that does not confirm the subject but accuses it. In the third section, I explore Levinas's understanding of dialogue. In his view, dialogue resists a \"priority of knowledge\" and has an antecedence that points to the common origin of language and ethics. In my conclusion, I describe the resulting intersections and breaks and how a dialogue between Hegel and Levinas can be established against this background.","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125389488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2022-11-29DOI: 10.5840/levinas202281620
Christina Schües
{"title":"The Primacy of Responsibility: Hannah Arendt and Emmanuel Levinas","authors":"Christina Schües","doi":"10.5840/levinas202281620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/levinas202281620","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Responsibility is central to Emmanuel Levinas as well as Hannah Arendt. A reading of their understanding of the concept and role of responsibility for politics and ethics and in regard to its social-ontological status of primacy, its reference to historical, worldly, and human conditions, brings out the similarities and differences of their work. Regarding their historical context, they could have engaged in a dialogue; but they never did. Their personal temperament and thematic approach to key issues concerning the concept of responsibility—such as subjectivity, primordiality, or relationality—can be used to build pillars for a bridge between the two thinkers' respective approaches. This essay tries to read each author in light of the other one.","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124450553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2022-11-29DOI: 10.5840/levinas20228218
Pascal Delhom
{"title":"Simone Weil and Emmanuel Levinas on Human Rights and the Sense of Obligation toward Others","authors":"Pascal Delhom","doi":"10.5840/levinas20228218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/levinas20228218","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:There was no dialogue between Simone Weil and Emmanuel Levinas. In many regards, however, their philosophies have much in common. Both defend a conception of human rights as rights of others and as an obligation for the self. Both understand this obligation as an obligation of attention and action for others, based on their needs and their vulnerability. Both find the source of this obligation in the transcendence of the other, and both connect it with a radical passivity of the self, who is subjected to this obligation in spite of itself. At the same time, this proximity between the two philosophers entails and reveals profound differences between them, partially due to the difference between Weil's metaphysics of light and Levinas's metaphysics of language. These differences concern the status of subjectivity and of its duty toward the other, as well as the idea of an acceptation of sufferance, especially of the sufferance of others.","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124569711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2022-11-29DOI: 10.5840/levinas202211327
Silvia Richter
{"title":"\"Jewish Existence as a Category of Being\": Revisiting Franz Rosenzweig's Influence on Levinas's Work","authors":"Silvia Richter","doi":"10.5840/levinas202211327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/levinas202211327","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article reconsiders the influence of Rosenzweig's thought on Levinas's work in the light of the captivity notebooks (Carnets de captivité), as well as the lectures given shortly after the war at the Collège philosophique. Levinas's ongoing dealings with Rosenzweig are discussed in two ways: first, by analyzing the articles he explicitly dedicated to Rosenzweig and, second, by identifying elements of Rosenzweig's thought in Levinas's work that are not explicitly mentioned therein. By combining these two approaches, I show that Rosenzweig's work offered Levinas an ontological narrative that contrasts with Heidegger's analysis of Dasein, and it motivated a concept of a new mode of transcendence linked to Judaism. Language, as spoken words produced face-to-face, plays a crucial role in this context: just as it opens up the mute Self into a loving Soul in The Star of Redemption, it is the face that speaks in Levinas, opening up the relationship to the Other and the \"beyond of being.\"","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122253103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Levinas StudiesPub Date : 2022-11-29DOI: 10.5840/levinas2022102524
Sergej Seitz
{"title":"The Aporia of Justice: Constellations of Normativity in Honneth, Derrida, and Levinas","authors":"Sergej Seitz","doi":"10.5840/levinas2022102524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/levinas2022102524","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:As Axel Honneth argues in his early essay \"The Other of Justice,\" Derrida and Levinas offer convincing arguments for offsetting practical philosophy's traditional focus on justice with a focus on care. In Honneth, this leads to a strict dichotomy of justice (as equal treatment) and care (as singular responsibility). I show that Derrida and Levinas think of justice and responsibility not as dichotomic, but rather as aporetic. In all ethico-political conflicts, aspects of responsibility and justice are in play that are irreducible to, and in constant tension with, one another. Derrida and Levinas disclose a constitutive aporia of justice. This aporia opens up new perspectives on normativity.","PeriodicalId":240967,"journal":{"name":"Levinas Studies","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114204343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}