Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum最新文献_第9页

Relasi Konseptual Oposisi Makna Sumbangan Korporasi Pada Partai Politik Dalam Semiotic Square 公司对政党在符号化广场上的政治贡献的概念上的对立

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-08-22 DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art4

Tashya Panji Nugraha

引用次数: 1

Persoalan Pengaturan Kewajiban Pemegang Paten untuk Membuat Produk atau Menggunakan Proses di Indonesia 关于设定专利持有者制造产品或使用印尼工艺的义务的问题

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-08-22 DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art6

Muh. Ali Masnun, Dina Roszana

{"title":"Persoalan Pengaturan Kewajiban Pemegang Paten untuk Membuat Produk atau Menggunakan Proses di Indonesia","authors":"Muh. Ali Masnun, Dina Roszana","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art6","url":null,"abstract":"The regulation of the obligation to implement patents by patent holders to create products or use of the processes in Indonesia is still relatively problematic. For example, the Regulation of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights No. 15 of 2018 concerning the Use of Patents by Patent Holders (Permenkumham No. 15 of 2018), actually negates Article 20 of Law No.13 of 2016 concerning Patents (2016 Patent Law). This study examines and evaluates the issue of regulating the obligations of patent holders to create products or the use of processes in Indonesia. This research uses the normative juridical method by using secondary data. The results of the study concluded that the 2016 Patent Law and Permenkumham No. 15 of 2018 as a basis for its implementation is still relatively short and has several weaknesses. Such as the unclarity of when the patent starts, the scope and type of patents that must be implemented, the implementation delay is not accompanied by criteria (reasons) whether or not a delay can be made, the time limit for submitting the application for a delay that does not pay attention to the duration of patent protection, the absence of anticipatory provisions to overcome the conditions of delay request rejection from the Ministry, as well as arrangements for the extension of the delay that is not paired with a deadline and criteria for the extention allowance.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121117704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Kepailitan Terhadap Anak Perusahaan dalam Holding Company Badan Usaha Milik Negara

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-08-22 DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art7

S ChintyaDewiRestyana, Nikmah Mentari, S. Wulandari

{"title":"Kepailitan Terhadap Anak Perusahaan dalam Holding Company Badan Usaha Milik Negara","authors":"S ChintyaDewiRestyana, Nikmah Mentari, S. Wulandari","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art7","url":null,"abstract":"Bankruptcy is a risk that can occur to both a subsidiary or a parent company in a state-owned holding enterprise. It is not a trivial matter for the state-owned holding company if its subsidiary suffers from bankruptcy, considering the position of the subsidiary and the parent company are separated, yet in some cases, the subsidiary is instead treated equally as a state-owned enterprise. The first issue would be, what is the legal relationship between the parent company and its subsidiary in the state-owned holding company; and second, how is the responsibility towards the bankrupted subsidiary. This research uses the normative juridical method. In which, it is concluded that first, as separate and independent entities, both the parent company and its subsidiary are restricted by the nature of separate legal entities and limited liabilities in carrying out their respective activities, even though they are bound under the same holding company. Second, the bankruptcy of a subsidiary of the state-owned holding company can occur and the responsibility of the parent company is limited to the shares that it owns, and if it is discovered that in its financial management, the parent company contribute in the bankruptcy of the subsidiary, then the responsibilities can expand.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132686650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Pengelolaan Flight Information Region Di Wilayah Kepulauan Riau Dan Natuna

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-08-22 DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art9

Mahfud Fahrazi

{"title":"Pengelolaan Flight Information Region Di Wilayah Kepulauan Riau Dan Natuna","authors":"Mahfud Fahrazi","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art9","url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the study of Flight Information Region (FIR) management in the Riau and Natuna Islands, which since 1946 is still controlled by Singapore. Although various attempts to take over the control have been carried out by the Indonesian government, it is yet to produce any meaningful results. The limitation of the problem in this study is first, the implications that arise from the management of FIR by Singapore on the Riau Islands and Natuna airspace. Second, the efforts that have been made by the Indonesian government to take over the management of FIR by Singapore over the Riau Islands and Natuna airspace. This research uses a normative legal research by analysing the legal issues through international treaties, legal regulations and other literature related to FIR management. The results of the study concluded first, the management of FIR by Singapore over the Riau Islands and Natuna influenced the enforcement of Indonesia's airspace sovereignty and national defence. Secondly, Indonesia's efforts and readiness to take over aviation navigation services include the formation of a special team from several ministries and other relevant institutions to prepare technical and operational steps as well as diplomatic steps in the framework of restructuring the FIR.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126838969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Kriteria Keseimbangan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Komutatif

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-08-22 DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art8

Tiar Ramon

引用次数: 2

Membangun Sistem Integritas Untuk Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia 建立一个廉洁的制度，以消除印尼刑事司法系统的腐败

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI: 10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART3

M. Masyhudi

{"title":"Membangun Sistem Integritas Untuk Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia","authors":"M. Masyhudi","doi":"10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART3","url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyse and observe: first, the current system of corruption eradication in the Indonesia's positive law perspective; second, the strategy of the Indonesian government to eradicate the corruption in future; and third, the concept of an Integrity System to eradicate the corruption ininvestigations conducted by the Prosecutors, Police and KPK in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical legal research using a legal and conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that first, the system of corruption eradication in Indonesian positive law currently has placed KPK as a leader, causing disharmony among the law enforcers; second, the Indonesian government's strategy to eradicate corruption in the future can be done through an integrity system within the scope of the KPK, the Police and the Prosecutor's Office; third, the concept of the Integrity System for corruption in investigation by the Attorney General's Office, the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission is carried out by establishing the Integrity Court. This integrity system must be able to position the three institutions as the independent Anti-Corruption Bodies.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116803431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Implementasi PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2015 di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI: 10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART9

B. Sutiyoso, Ayu Atika Dewi, Fuadi Isnawan

{"title":"Implementasi PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2015 di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta","authors":"B. Sutiyoso, Ayu Atika Dewi, Fuadi Isnawan","doi":"10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART9","url":null,"abstract":"o overcome the barriers in the dispute settlement in court, the Supreme Court issued a new mechanism for the settlement of civil cases, called as simple civil claims. The procedure mechanism was introduced through the issuance of PERMA No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Civil Claim. The researcher in this study intended to observe the implementation of the PERMA of Simple Civil Claim in Yogyakarta DistrictCourt, along with the obstacles. The study was conducted using the empirical juridical research methodand analytical descriptive data analysis. From the research results, it can be concluded that the implementation of PERMA No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Civil Claim in Yogyakarta District Court is still ineffective in practice. This has been determined by various factors such as the rule of law, legal officers, facilities and infrastructure and community. The researcher also found a number of obstaclesfaced in implementing PERMA, some of which were related to the existence of options to choose the procedure mechanism, tight case qualifications that could be submitted through simple program procedures and lack of PERMA socialization.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"5 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114049125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Menyinergikan Aturan Prudensial Dan Aturan Kepatuhan Syariah Pada Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia 将保真度的规定和伊斯兰教法对印尼伊斯兰银行的严格要求加以对比

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI: 10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART6

Agus Triyanta

{"title":"Menyinergikan Aturan Prudensial Dan Aturan Kepatuhan Syariah Pada Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia","authors":"Agus Triyanta","doi":"10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART6","url":null,"abstract":"Besidesbeing generally bound by prudential principles in banking regulations, Islamic banking in Indonesia is also bound by sharia principles. In reality, there are several contradictions between these two jurisdictions (conventional banking and Islamic banking). This article aims to discuss why the contradictions between these two jurisdictions can occur. Furthermore, how the possibilities are to make harmony or adjustment among the various different elements, so that these two different jurisdictions can synergistically play a role in driving the development of Islamic banking in Indonesia. The research method in this article is normative legal research with a qualitative analysis model. The conclusion of this article showed that the set of regulations related to the prudential principle of banking in two banking models (conventional and sharia) in fact were the same. It was because this regulation related to banking prudential was originally designed for conventional banking, and, when applied to Islamic banking, various adjustments were needed, for example in the collateral case. This article recommends that sharia-based prudential principles should be immediately integrated into the regulation of banking prudential principles in general to prevent any problems arose from the application of Islamic banking.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132603721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Kedudukan PT. Angkasa Pura I Dalam Pembayaran Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI: 10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART8

Ridwan Hr, Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap, Siti Ruhama Mardhatillah

{"title":"Kedudukan PT. Angkasa Pura I Dalam Pembayaran Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan","authors":"Ridwan Hr, Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap, Siti Ruhama Mardhatillah","doi":"10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART8","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the issues of, first, the special assignment of the Minister of BUMN (State Owned Enterprise) and the Minister of Transportation to PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) in land procurement forthe construction of the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) airport in Kulon Progo Regency, DIY Province whether it can invalidate the obligations of PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) to pay BPHTB. Second, it is regarding the land procurement for the construction of the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) airport in Kulon Progo Regency, Special District of Yogyakarta whether it can be qualified as \"land acquisition for the development of public interest\" which is freed from the obligation to payBPHTB. This is a normative legal research using primary and secondary legal materials obtained through literature studies and is analyzed juridical. From the research results, it can be concluded that, first, special assignments could not invalidate the obligations of PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) to payBPHTB. Secondly, PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) in Kulon Progo Regency of Special District of Yogyakarta Province cannot be qualified as \"land acquisition for development for public interest\" freed from the obligation to pay BPHTB.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115057652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Tinjauan Kasus Tentang Dilusi Merek Di Indonesia Dan Thailand 在印度尼西亚和泰国调查品牌稀释的案例

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI: 10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART1

R. Permata, Tasya Safiranita, Biondy Utama

{"title":"Tinjauan Kasus Tentang Dilusi Merek Di Indonesia Dan Thailand","authors":"R. Permata, Tasya Safiranita, Biondy Utama","doi":"10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL26.ISS1.ART1","url":null,"abstract":"Theuse of well-known brands without any license, in practice, often intentionally or unintentionally occurs that not only leads violations but also confusion for the public. The use of a brand without any license -but not creating any public confusion -is referred to as brand dilution. This article aims to examine the brand dilution case occurred in Indonesia and Thailand by concerning with two issues: first, to study the case of IKEA vs. IKEMA occurred in Indonesia and the case of STARBUCKS vs. STARBUNG inThailand including in the brand dilution. Second, to study the protection of well-known brands from brand dilution in Indonesia and Thailand. The research used was normative juridical method by means of the statute approach, case approach, analytical approach and comparative approach. The results of this study indicated that first the case of IKEA vs. IKEMA occurred in Indonesia and the case of STARBUCKS vs. STARBUNG is categorized as the brand dilution in consideration to the brand use that has a similarity to well-known brands. Though it has a different class of goods and/or services, it can eliminate the uniqueness of the famous brand. Second, both Indonesia and Thailand have not specifically regulated the brand dilution. Indonesia is only based on the overall protection on equality and/or equality in principle, while Thailand is only based protection on confusion.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129541516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1