发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
[Medical expert assessment and civil and criminal law from the viewpoint of arbitration services and the expert committee]. [从仲裁机构和专家委员会的角度看医学专家评估和民事和刑法]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
C Vorster
{"title":"[Medical expert assessment and civil and criminal law from the viewpoint of arbitration services and the expert committee].","authors":"C Vorster","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The procedures of the arbitration committee of north Germany for medical liability claims are discussed. This procedure is set into relation to that at court. Due to the continuously maintained communication between lawyers and physicians, which does not occur in a comparable manner in court, the choice to proceed at a arbitration committee and an expert board is seen as more useful and pertinent than at court. This is specifically explained.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"586-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20022447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Conflicting expert opinions from the medical viewpoint]. [从医学角度来看，专家意见相互矛盾]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
G Specht
{"title":"[Conflicting expert opinions from the medical viewpoint].","authors":"G Specht","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The difference of expert assessments is mainly due to individual views but may be caused by other factors from the medical part. Some assessments sound different for the non-medical listener without really being different-at least from the approach. Additionally, the language of expert witnesses are quite different, plausible phrasing goes down well. The kind of the expert assessment or diversity of clients does not influence essentially the frequency of conflicts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"640-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20021611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Development of expert assessment in the malpractice lawsuit from the viewpoint of the judge]. [从法官角度看医疗事故诉讼中专家鉴定的发展]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
H Franzki
{"title":"[Development of expert assessment in the malpractice lawsuit from the viewpoint of the judge].","authors":"H Franzki","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The expert testimony in medical malpractice suits is being criticized until today. The most important objection: The medical experts do not obey their duty to be impartial; they are reluctant to testify against their colleagues regardless of the merits of the plaintiffs' case. But owing to ignorance they often violate further duties they have to comply with as experts, too. The medical profession in the past neglected the instruction-of physicians, who act as experts in malpractice cases. But judges are also responsible for the situation: Not in all cases they do pay enough attention to the selection, instruction and questioning of the medical expert. Many mistakes made in the field of expert testimony meanwhile are recognized and eliminated. Nevertheless seminars for the further instruction of physicians and lawyers are urgently necessary in order to improve the medical expert testimony.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"652-6; discussion 656-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20021614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--medical expert assessment from the viewpoint of the attorney]. 【民法与刑法中的医学专家鉴定——律师视角下的医学专家鉴定】。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
C Dierks
{"title":"[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--medical expert assessment from the viewpoint of the attorney].","authors":"C Dierks","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dealing with a medical expert assessment requires experience and perseverance of the lawyer. Exact knowledge about the expert opinion itself and the procedural options is of greatest importance due to the decisive impact of the medical expert assessment on the outcome of the lawsuit. The lawyer has to consider at any time of the process whether he can initiate an expert assessment, whether he has to evaluate, criticize or question obtained expert assessments, whether he has to challenge the expert or possibly has to introduce another expert into the lawsuit. The expert witness has to have professional knowledge and the lawyer as well as the court have to absorb this knowledge and use it accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"602-5; discussion 606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20021040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint]. [从法律角度来看，专家意见相互矛盾]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
F J Pelz
{"title":"[Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint].","authors":"F J Pelz","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical lability actions do rarely without expert assessment. The basic rule of free evidence recognition applies for the evaluation of conflicting expert assessments which forces the judge to examine closely. It is reported about formal mistakes of an expert assessment and the appropriate handling of different expert assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"636-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20021610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law from the medical viewpoint]. [从医学角度看民法和刑法中的医学专家鉴定]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
G Carstensen
{"title":"[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law from the medical viewpoint].","authors":"G Carstensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The demands on a medical witness are discussed. Physicians have to learn to deal with the legal conditions of their profession but lawyers have to be ready to understand the circumstances of the medical activity. Since 1975, independent medical bodies in the form of arbitration committees and expert boards have been founded in the Federal Republic of Germany. This extended the field of action for medical experts. However, a definition of the term \"expert\" is missing. There are rules for the continuing medical training by the German societies of physicians which should guide the courts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"581-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20022446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Limits of patient responsibility for cooperation with medical experts]. [病人与医学专家合作的责任限度]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
H L Schreiber
{"title":"[Limits of patient responsibility for cooperation with medical experts].","authors":"H L Schreiber","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accused, the parties and the witnesses have different far-reaching duties of cooperation in the different proceedings. This will be investigated in the following paper. The most differentiated regulations can be found in criminal proceedings. The principle of reasonableness forms a limit but is difficult to put in concrete terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"642-6; discussion 647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20021612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Medical expert assessment in criminal processes from the legal viewpoint]. [从法律角度看刑事诉讼中的医学专家评估]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
K Ulsenheimer
{"title":"[Medical expert assessment in criminal processes from the legal viewpoint].","authors":"K Ulsenheimer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the area of medical professional blunder, the medical expert witness is the one participant in a trial whose statement is practically decisive for the court or the prosecutor. Legally, the responsibility remains naturally in the legal hand as the expert witness is only the assistant of the judge. The most important demands on the expert witness are strict objectiveness including towards the colleague, no independent inquiries or interrogations, comprehensive processing of the expert assessment, readiness to revise a written expert assessment according to better knowledge or new facts, independence from the client, no legal comments, clarity of language and intellectual honesty.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"574-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20022445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law from the legal liability viewpoint]. [从法律责任的角度看民事和刑事医学专家鉴定]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
H J Kümper
{"title":"[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law from the legal liability viewpoint].","authors":"H J Kümper","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In view of the wide range of liability claims, expert medical reports constitute part of the basis of the work of liability insurers. However, the very different qualifications of experts often present the so-called \"corporate physician\" with great problems, since some expert reports are hardly acceptable, as the author discovered during many years of study of a large number of liability files. In addition, the most striking and frequently occurring criteria are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"589-90; discussion 591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20022448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--legal evaluation of medical expert opinion]. [民法和刑法中的医学专家鉴定——医学专家意见的法律评价]。
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01
G H Schlund
{"title":"[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--legal evaluation of medical expert opinion].","authors":"G H Schlund","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The constitutional position of the judge and the medical expert witness during a lawsuit is explained. From this, the demands on a judicial expert witness for the preparation of his expert assessment are derived and the judge's function in the appointment of the expert witness is explained. Additionally, criteria, duties, and rules are worked out, which should be followed by the judge during assessment of the medical expert testimony.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"596-602"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20021039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信