University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series最新文献

Choosing Your Battles: Endogenous Multihoming and Platform Competition 选择你的战斗:内生多址和平台竞争

University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2021-05-06 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3847216

M. Haan, Gijsbert Zwart, Nannette Stoffers

引用次数: 9

Landjepik in Nederland: Een verkennend empirisch onderzoek naar het gebruik zonder recht van gemeentegrond (Illegal Land Use in the Netherlands: An Explorative Empirical Study on the Use of Municipal Land Without Any Right) 荷兰非法土地使用的探索性实证研究(荷兰非法土地使用:关于没有权利使用城市土地的探索性实证研究)

University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3080849

Björn Hoops

{"title":"Landjepik in Nederland: Een verkennend empirisch onderzoek naar het gebruik zonder recht van gemeentegrond (Illegal Land Use in the Netherlands: An Explorative Empirical Study on the Use of Municipal Land Without Any Right)","authors":"Björn Hoops","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3080849","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3080849","url":null,"abstract":"Dutch Abstract: Geschillen over een zonder instemming verschoven erfgrens tussen buren of over door de burger zonder enig recht of titel gebruikte gemeentegrond doen zich veelvuldig voor in Nederland. Er is echter geen wetenschappelijk onderzoek gedaan naar de vraag hoe vaak en in welke situaties illegaal grondgebruik in Nederland voorkomt. Dit onderzoek, gefinancierd door de Gratama stichting, vult deze lacune. Aan de hand van vijf case studies in Nederlandse gemeenten wordt onderzocht hoe vaak welke grond met welke oorspronkelijke functie, in welke omgeving en voor welke doeleinden illegaal wordt gebruikt. \u0000 \u0000English Abstract: Throughout the Netherlands, land owners (or their lessees) use adjacent public or private land without any right. There is, however, no scientific empirical data on how often and where land is illegally used. On the basis of five empirical case studies, this research has the following aims: make an estimate of how often illegal land use occurs in the Netherlands; which kind of land is illegally used; in what kind of spatial context it is illegally used; and for what purpose it is illegally used.","PeriodicalId":236019,"journal":{"name":"University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124846173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Empirical Assessment of the Quality of Nationalities: The Quality of Nationality Index (QNI) 民族素质的实证评价:民族素质指数(QNI)

University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2017-10-15 DOI: 10.1163/22134514-00404007

D. Kochenov, J. Lindeboom

引用次数: 32

Principles-Based Regulation and Public Trust in the Post-Crisis World: The Dutch Case of Financial Services 危机后世界中基于原则的监管与公众信任:荷兰金融服务业案例

University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2016-05-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3746600

H. Bröring, O. Cherednychenko

{"title":"Principles-Based Regulation and Public Trust in the Post-Crisis World: The Dutch Case of Financial Services","authors":"H. Bröring, O. Cherednychenko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3746600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746600","url":null,"abstract":"This contribution reveals an uneasy relationship between principles-based regulation and public trust in financial institutions and services in the post-crisis era, with a particular focus on Dutch financial supervision legislation. The main question addressed is whether principles-based regulation is the right way to overcome the crisis of trust in the financial markets. The authors argue that the acceptance of principles-based regulation in the Dutch legal order is to be welcomed. At the same time, resort to principles-based regulation entails many challenges which may undermine its effectiveness and, hence, public trust in the financial markets. These challenges in the Netherlands include but are not limited to the absence of any significant pressure on the financial watchdogs to clarify the meaning of open norms, the lack of clarity concerning the status of public soft law already produced to this end, and tension between public and private soft law in shaping the content of open norms. Without addressing these challenges, principles-based regulation may prove to be too obscure to guide the financial services industry towards a cultural change.","PeriodicalId":236019,"journal":{"name":"University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115550970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Avoiding Terminological Confusion Between the Notions of ‘Biometrics’ and ‘Biometric Data’: An Investigation Into the Meanings of the Terms From a European Data Protection and a Scientific Perspective 避免“生物计量学”和“生物计量数据”概念之间的术语混淆:从欧洲数据保护和科学角度对术语含义的调查

University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2015-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/IDPL/IPV020

C. Jasserand

{"title":"Avoiding Terminological Confusion Between the Notions of ‘Biometrics’ and ‘Biometric Data’: An Investigation Into the Meanings of the Terms From a European Data Protection and a Scientific Perspective","authors":"C. Jasserand","doi":"10.1093/IDPL/IPV020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/IDPL/IPV020","url":null,"abstract":"This article has been motivated by an observation: the lack of rigor by European bodies when they use scientific terms to address data protection and privacy issues raised by biometric technologies and biometric data. In particular, they improperly use the term ‘biometrics’ to mean at the same time ‘biometric data’, ‘identification method’, or ‘biometric technologies’. Based on this observation, there is a need to clarify what ‘biometrics’ means for the biometric community and whether and how the legal community should use the term in a data protection and privacy context. In parallel to that exercise of clarification, there is also a need to investigate the current legal definition of ‘biometric data’ as framed by European bodies at the level of the European Union and the Council of Europe. The comparison of the regulatory and scientific definitions of the term ‘biometric data’ reveals that the term is used in two different contexts. However, it is legitimate to question the role that the scientific definition could exercise on the regulatory definition. More precisely, the question is whether the technical process through which biometric information is extracted and transformed into a biometric template should be reflected in the regulatory definition of the term.","PeriodicalId":236019,"journal":{"name":"University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127223792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

The Internal Aspects of Good Neighbourliness in the EU: Loyalty and Values 欧盟睦邻关系的内在层面:忠诚与价值观

University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2015-01-11 DOI: 10.1163/9789004299788_004

D. Kochenov

{"title":"The Internal Aspects of Good Neighbourliness in the EU: Loyalty and Values","authors":"D. Kochenov","doi":"10.1163/9789004299788_004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004299788_004","url":null,"abstract":"This contribution argues that the legal context of the EU is substantially different from the classical context within which the international law principle of good neighbourly relations is usually deployed, altering the traditional understanding of the principle to a great degree. Firstly, to be a good neighbour in the context of the Union implies not only respect for international law vis-à-vis neighbouring states and a strict adherence to the acquis. It also indispensably implies strict adherence to the values of the Union, including democracy, the rule of law and the protection of human rights – if not justice and minority protection. Being a good neighbour in the EU thus means being a particular type of state, embracing a particular type of constitutionalism. Secondly, the principle of good neighbourly relations, particularly in the context of EU enlargements and EU citizenship, implies that the Member States should be ready to adapt their national laws to the Union reality even outside the context of the EU acquis. In other words, having legitimate regulation in place, which is not in breach of international or EU law per se, can still amount to a violation of the principle of good neighbourly relations in the Union context. The examples of EU pre-accession conditionality in the fields of democracy and the rule of law, and of the recent reforms of the Slovak and Hungarian citizenship laws both suffice to make this point. Given the specificity of the legal reality of interdependence that the Union has shaped, it is perfectly legitimate to expect the EU to intervene should some Member States fail to internalise this special EU reality and cause negative externalities which start to affect others.","PeriodicalId":236019,"journal":{"name":"University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114364055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Debating Europe's Justice Deficit: The EU, Swabian Housewives, Rawls, and Ryanair 辩论欧洲的司法赤字:欧盟、斯瓦本的主妇、罗尔斯和瑞安航空

University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2354568

Gráinne de Búrca, D. Kochenov, Andrew Williams

{"title":"Debating Europe's Justice Deficit: The EU, Swabian Housewives, Rawls, and Ryanair","authors":"Gráinne de Búrca, D. Kochenov, Andrew Williams","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2354568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2354568","url":null,"abstract":"This edited working paper proposes a new way of appraising the process of European integration, taking the notion of Justice as a starting point. With a number of contributions from the leading theorists of EU integration as well as younger scholars and practitioners of European law, it adopts a multi-faceted approach to what the editors branded as a possible \"justice deficit\" in Europe, looking at procedural as well as substantive elements of justice, also connecting justice with legitimacy, democracy, the rule of law, and other key principles of European law. Taking justice seriously is no doubt an indispensable element of any mature constitutional system. In starting the debate on justice in the EU context and immediately involving a number of leading scholars into the debate, the working paper aims at bridging an important gap in our theorising of European integration and law by starting a wide exchange on the topic of key importance, which is the essence of Justice, informing the integration project in Europe.The following scholars contributed to the debate: Daniel Augenstein, Richard Bellamy, Grainne de Burca, Daniela Caruso, Damian Chalmers, Gareth Davies, Sionaidh Douglas-Scott, Oliver Gerstenberg, Jane Holder, Dimitry Kochenov, Damjan Kukovec, Mattias Kumm, Justine Lacroix, Antonia Layard, Carole Lyons, Agustin J. Menendez, Jurgen Neyer, Danny Nicol, Fernanda Nicola, Jiri Priban, Andras Sajo, Robert Schutze, Joanne Scott, Suryapratim Roy, Stavros Tsakyrakis, Juri Viehoff, Neil Walker, Michael Wilkinson, Andrew Williams and Floris de Witte.","PeriodicalId":236019,"journal":{"name":"University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130499122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Chinese Judicial Practice in Private International Law: 2006 国际私法中的中国司法实践;2006

University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2009-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/CHINESEJIL/JMP025

Jin Huang, Lianbin Song, Qingming Li, Weidi Long

引用次数: 2