Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present最新文献_第3页

Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present Pub Date : 2018-10-24 DOI: 10.4324/9780203822364-7

Angela Howard, S. Tarrant

引用次数: 0

Why I Am Not a Feminist: Some Remarks on the Problem of Gender Identity in the United States and Poland 为什么我不是女权主义者:美国和波兰的性别认同问题述评

Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present Pub Date : 2018-10-24 DOI: 10.4324/9780203822364-31

Mira Marody

引用次数: 2

The Abortion Debate 关于堕胎的辩论

Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present Pub Date : 2018-10-24 DOI: 10.4324/9780203822364-4

R. B. Potter

引用次数: 0

Working Women: How It's Working Out 《职业女性:如何工作

Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present Pub Date : 2018-10-24 DOI: 10.4324/9780203822364-15

Shirley Wilkins, Thomas A. Miller

引用次数: 0

The Feminist Movement 女权运动

Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present Pub Date : 2011-08-27 DOI: 10.4324/9780203822364-11

E. Snowden

引用次数: 0

Cultural Assault 文化上的攻击

Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present Pub Date : 1993-09-22 DOI: 10.4324/9780203822364-30

Margaret D. Bonilla

{"title":"Cultural Assault","authors":"Margaret D. Bonilla","doi":"10.4324/9780203822364-30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203822364-30","url":null,"abstract":"Rape is selling a lot of magazines these days. You can't walk past a newsstand without seeing dozens of articles -- many written by avowed feminists -- disclosing new evidence of a rape epidemic, and how we women can protect ourselves in the face of escalating aggression and violence against our gender. The typical basis of these articles is that rape is distinct from other forms of violent crime. It is a crime against women. It is an act of subjugation by men. Rape presents a constant, all-pervasive threat; it can happen to a woman anywhere, at any time: on a date, at a family reunion, even in a marriage. The keys to preventing rape, feminists will tell you, are to change male-dominated cultural attitudes toward women, to get women to protect themselves, and to get Americans to take the issue of sexual violence more seriously. The feminists are wrong. Rape is not the victimization of all women by all men; rape is a heinous crime committed by violent individuals against innocent victims. Americans have always taken this crime very seriously, so seriously that a rape conviction, until the 1960s, was punishable by death. The great majority of men in our society are not rapists; indeed, most men fear the rape of their wives, daughters, sisters, mothers, and other female loved ones as much as women themselves do. As for stopping rapists, what the feminists don't tell you is that one of the best ways to prevent rape, and other violent crimes as well, is to put convicted criminals in jail and keep them there. A case in point is Willie Horton. A Violent Man Willie Horton was convicted for the 1974 murder of a Massachusetts teenage boy. The details of the crime are grisly: Willie Horton kidnapped the boy, stabbed him to death, and then castrated and dismembered his body. Mr. Horton was convicted of murder, and because of the ferocity of the crime, was sentenced to two life sentences in prison without possibility of parole. As governor of Massachusetts, Michael Dukakis inherited a controversial program to grant convicted felons -- even those with violent criminal records -- weekend furlough privileges. Although Mr. Dukakis had been warned of the dangerous implications of the furlough program, he decided to leave it in place. And Willie Horton, although only eight years into his life sentence, was somehow assessed as an appropriate candidate for a furlough Mr. Horton passed 10 uneventful furlough weekends in Massachusetts. On the 11th furlough, he fled the state, kidnapped a Maryland couple, and brutally raped the woman while forcing her fiance to watch; then he savagely beat the woman's fiance. He was caught and convicted in Maryland of first degree rape and assault. When the public learned of Willie Horton, the outcry was swift and furious. The story was first covered by the Lawrence, Massachusetts Eagle Tribune, which won a Pulitzer Prize for its investigative reporting. During the 1988 Democratic primaries, Al Gore referred to Willie Horton to suggest ","PeriodicalId":232967,"journal":{"name":"Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124609550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Feminism 《聪明女性的女权主义指南

Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present Pub Date : 1981-07-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780203822364-12

M. Decter

引用次数: 0

The Economics of Middle-Income Family Life: Working Women During the Great Depression 中等收入家庭生活的经济学:大萧条时期的职业女性

Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present Pub Date : 1978-06-01 DOI: 10.2307/1888142

Winifred D. Wandersee Bolin

{"title":"The Economics of Middle-Income Family Life: Working Women During the Great Depression","authors":"Winifred D. Wandersee Bolin","doi":"10.2307/1888142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1888142","url":null,"abstract":"HEhistory of women and work is becoming an increasingly fertile field of research for historians, and the interest in this topic has generated a great deal of valuable scholarship. If there is one theme that emerges, it is that women's work outside of the home has been an extension of their family role and a reflection of their economic need. From the historian's point of view, the \"pin-money theory\" is dead.' Long before the depression of the 1930s, married women left their homes to work in the factories and fields, in the homes of other women, and, increasingly during the twentieth century, in clerical and service occupations. In the decade between 1930 and 1940, the number of married women in the labor force increased by nearly 50 percent, while their numbers in the population increased by only 15 percent. By 1940 married women were 35 percent of the female labor force, in comparison to 29 percent in 1930 (see Table 1). Thus, in spite of the oversupply of labor and the underemployment of the population as a whole, married women workers made substantial numerical gains during the depression decade. It would be a mistake to suggest that the 1930s represented a new direction; rather, the labor force behavior of these years was a continuation of long-term trends that had been developing since the turn of the century. In fact, the gains of","PeriodicalId":232967,"journal":{"name":"Reaction to the Modern Women's Movement, 1963 to the Present","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1978-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123910897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2