Law & Society: Public Law - Courts eJournal最新文献_第2页

In the Shadow of Judicial Supremacy: Putting the Idea of Judicial Dialogue in its Place 在司法至上的阴影下:把司法对话的理念放回原位

Law & Society: Public Law - Courts eJournal Pub Date : 2016-03-01 DOI: 10.1111/raju.12093

Ming‐Sung Kuo

引用次数: 2

Brief of Amicus Curiae Complex Litigation Law Professors in Support of Respondents: Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146 法庭之友复杂诉讼法学教授支持被告的摘要:泰森食品公司诉Bouaphakeo案，第14-1146号

Law & Society: Public Law - Courts eJournal Pub Date : 2015-09-29 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2669672

Sergio J. Campos, Suzette M. Malveaux, D. Rosenberg, Michael D. Sant'Ambrogio, Jay Tidmarsh, Adam S. Zimmerman

引用次数: 0

Interpreting the Rules of the Game 解读游戏规则

Law & Society: Public Law - Courts eJournal Pub Date : 2007-05-19 DOI: 10.5771/9783845204291-13

Chrysostomos Mantzavinos

引用次数: 2

Culture Clash: The Sociology of WTO Precedent 文化冲突:WTO先例的社会学

Law & Society: Public Law - Courts eJournal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748908296-99

H. Cohen

{"title":"Culture Clash: The Sociology of WTO Precedent","authors":"H. Cohen","doi":"10.5771/9783748908296-99","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99","url":null,"abstract":"Thanks to the United States, the WTO Appellate Body can no longer hear appeals. Having blocked all appointments to the body, the United States has left its bench empty, with no members to fulfill its role. Among the United States’ justifications: The Appellate Body’s adoption of an apparent doctrine of precedent. This chapter takes a deeper look at the fight over precedent at the WTO, both as a case study in the emergence and operation of precedent within international law and as a microcosm of the cultural conflicts playing out within the WTO. The chapter develops an account of precedent as a product of three overlapping, inter-dependent, and mutually constructed logics: (1) the jurisprudential, (2) the rational, and (3) the sociological. It then uses these three logics to retell the story of precedent at the WTO – the emerging patterns of argumentative practice, the Appellate Body’s adoption of a doctrinal test, and the escalating U.S. opposition to the “cogent reasons” standard that body applied. Seeing the fight over precedent as a function of all three logics reveals the real cultural fights for control of the WTO community of practice. Seeing that community of practice coalesce around and split over unwritten practices of precedent reveals how international law develops as much as a function of culture, training, and practice as of rules and power.","PeriodicalId":229524,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Courts eJournal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123731244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0