C. Ingabire, P. Mshenga, Michèle Amacker, J. Langat, Christine Bigler, E. Birachi
{"title":"Agricultural transformation in Rwanda: Can Gendered Market Participation Explain the Persistence of Subsistence Farming?","authors":"C. Ingabire, P. Mshenga, Michèle Amacker, J. Langat, Christine Bigler, E. Birachi","doi":"10.31532/gendwomensstud.2.1.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31532/gendwomensstud.2.1.004","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the efforts to agricultural transformation in Rwanda, farming systems are \u0000predominantly still in subsistence production. Women are more involved than men, and \u0000their number has even increased in the past decade. The reasons for this remain unclear, \u0000given the country’s efforts for gender mainstreaming towards market-oriented \u0000agriculture. Guided by the current debate on feminization of agriculture, we base this \u0000study on the thesis that higher market participation among women farmers could \u0000contribute to the so-called transformation. The study uses the case of the Northern \u0000Province of Rwanda. It involved 368 smallholder dual-headed households among which \u0000208 and 160 were respectively producing beans and potato. It used a mixed method \u0000approach by sequential exploratory design, involving a quantitative survey households \u0000followed by Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Both Household Commercialization Index \u0000(HCI) and Thematic Analyses were used. Findings showed a high degree of \u0000commercialization for potato, with 75% of farmers participating in output markets, and \u000072% among them being market oriented. In contrast, only 26% of bean farmers sold their \u0000production. The commercialization of potato is in the hands of men, while beans are \u0000mainly sold by women. This was also confirmed with the findings from FGDs. Three issues \u0000were identified as hindrances to agricultural transformation and likely to keep households \u0000in subsistence production: the low participation of women in input and output markets; \u0000their limited control over agricultural income; and their increased workload that combines \u0000on-farm and reproductive works. Therefore, despite the efforts at policy level, there are still gender inequalities within dual-headed farming households, and the agricultural \u0000transformation risks increasing the gap through all or some of the three identified issues. \u0000Removing these inequalities could increase households’ market participation and \u0000contribute in the process of agricultural transformation.","PeriodicalId":228317,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Women's Studies","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122288539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Use of Female Family and Hired Labour in Agriculture: An Empirical Study in Western Uttar Pradesh, India","authors":"Kavita Baliyan","doi":"10.31532/gendwomensstud.2.1.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31532/gendwomensstud.2.1.002","url":null,"abstract":"The role of women in Indian agriculture has been highlighted in a large number of studies. However, there are only a few studies which highlight the role of household female workers in agricultural activities on their family farms. Female family workers constitute a special category of labour who are called to join in agricultural work on farm whenever demand for labour increases. They are, thus, a flexible source of labour supply. Their work is seasonal and intermittent and remains unpaid and hence unrecognized. Most of the studies of female labour in agriculture were undertaken in the early decades of the green revolution. There are few recent field studies of women participation in agriculture in India. Moreover, the earlier studies were mostly confined to wheat and rice growing regions and did not look at the labour intensive commercial crops like sugarcane. The present study seeks to fill up these gaps in literature by particularly focusing upon the role of household female workers in an agriculturally developed region specializing in sugarcane cultivation. The study is based upon an intensive field survey of 240 farm households located in the agriculturally developed western region of Uttar Pradesh, the most populous state of India. The study reveals that the contribution of women to agricultural work in the study area which specializes in sugarcane cultivation is higher than their contribution revealed by earlier studies in wheat growing northern states of Punjab and Haryana, but it is lower than their involvement in the rice growing regions of south India. The study also confirms the inverse relationship between size of holding and use of female labour observed in the earlier studies. Our findings about the work segregation by sexes are also in line with the findings of the earlier studies. The study stresses that women workers in agriculture should be given due recognition in public policy to reduce the gender gap in agriculture. have also opened new opportunities for women to engage in agricultural activities (Deere, 2005). The increasing role played by women in agriculture is, however, not reflected in the official estimates of women workers. The main reason for the non-recognition of the continued high participation of women in agriculture may be found in the general Euro-centric and middleclass bias, according to which all women are basically seen as housewives (Mies etal., 1986). The traditional social attitudes which view women as primarily responsible for household duties also leads to undercounting of women as workers especially in case of women who work on family farms (Kanchi, 2010; Mies, 1986). The social definition of women as housewives removes them ipso facto from the perception of researchers and development planners dealing with the labour market (Mies, 1982). In India, agriculture sector employs 65 percent of all economically active women as compared to 50 percent of men according to the Census 2011. Nearly 28 per cent o","PeriodicalId":228317,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Women's Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115353774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Dichotomy of Education: Public vs. Private","authors":"J. Dinkha","doi":"10.31532/GENDWOMENSSTUD.2.1.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31532/GENDWOMENSSTUD.2.1.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":228317,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Women's Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122652246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disability, Agency, and Subjectivity in Aparna Sen’s Three Disability Films: Sati, House of Memories, and 15 Park Avenue","authors":"Sreerupa Sengupta","doi":"10.31532/gendwomensstud.1.1.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31532/gendwomensstud.1.1.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":228317,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Women's Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133205921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Communicating Gender, Race and Nation in the Purvi Patel : The State, Biopower, and the Globality of Reproductive Surveillance","authors":"Priya Kapoor","doi":"10.31532/GendWomensStud.1.1.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31532/GendWomensStud.1.1.004","url":null,"abstract":"I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you prolife. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is.(Sister Joan Chitister quoted by Salzillo, 2015)","PeriodicalId":228317,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Women's Studies","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116388733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘Women Helping Women’: Domestic-skills Training for Unwed Mothers","authors":"Simone M. Caron","doi":"10.31532/gendwomensstud.2.2.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31532/gendwomensstud.2.2.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":228317,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Women's Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127638693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}