{"title":"PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL LAW, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE PROVISIONS OF THE DRAFT LAW “ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE”","authors":"A. Sharaia","doi":"10.15421/392165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15421/392165","url":null,"abstract":"The article describes the content of the principles of administrative procedural law, taking into account the provisions of the draft law “On Administrative Procedure”. It is substantiated that in the administrative-legal science the generally accepted concept of the principles of administrative-procedural law is not formed. This is the reason for discussions about their list and content, the role in the relevant sub-branch of administrative law. Therefore, there is an urgent need to study this basic concept of administrative law for branch science. Emphasis was placed on the need to adopt a “basic” special law that would define the general rules of administrative- procedural relations. Such a law should establish a list of relevant principles, as well as disclose their content. The results of modern domestic normative design work in the context of consolidating the principles of administrative procedures are analyzed. The peculiarities and shortcomings of consolidating the principles that are the basis of administrative- procedural relations are highlighted. The principles of administrative procedural law include: the rule of law; legality; equality of participants before the law; use of authority for a proper purpose; validity and certainty; impartiality (impartiality) of the administrative body; good faith and prudence; proportionality; openness; timeliness and reasonable time; efficiency; presumption of legality of actions and requirements of a person; officialism; guaranteeing the right of a person to participate in administrative proceedings; guaranteeing effective remedies; state language and accessibility. They complement each other and formulate a universal basis for the regulation of all administrative and procedural relations.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132165654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"STANDARDS OF FAIR JUSTICE IN ECONOMIC COURTS IN CONDITIONS OF REFORM","authors":"L. Nikolenko","doi":"10.15421/392152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15421/392152","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to study the problematic issues related to the implementation of fair justice standards in economic courts and to develop possible ways to solve them. The article states that in connection with the proclamation of the course of integration into the European Community and the approximation of the Ukrainian legal system to European and world standards, the introduction into Ukrainian law of provisions that exist for some time in international law is one of the important steps towards this goal. Ukraine’s accession to international conventions, taking into account international case law are one of the conditions for Ukraine’s transition to full-fledged market relations, sustainable economic development, as well as ensuring stability in economic activity, which is the most pressing problem in modern times. It is emphasized that fair justice cannot be administered at the national level without defining the institutional system. That is, the judiciary can be only organizational and financially independent bodies that are created and operate on the basis of law. It is noted that the element of fair justice is possible to determine the principle of procedural equality of the parties, which is defined as an integral element by which each party is given a reasonable opportunity to participate in the proceedings. Emphasis is placed on the principles of competition, accessibility and publicity. It was emphasized that not only the consideration of the case in court, but also other elements of the proceedings should be public. Of particular importance is the availability of judicial acts for public review, the publicity of the final stage of the proceedings. It is noted that the elements of the standard of fair justice have their own characteristics, due to the level of economic and social development, national and cultural traditions. At the same time, it is emphasized that there is a convergence of justice systems, due to the common problems that arise in today’s globalized world. In Ukraine, standards of fair justice must be implemented taking into account national characteristics and traditions. Conclusions and suggestions are made.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127758814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ON THE QUESTION OF THE GROUNDS FOR FAMILY RELATIONS IN LEGAL DOCTRINE","authors":"I. Kostiashkin","doi":"10.15421/392150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15421/392150","url":null,"abstract":"In the scientific article the author considers the question of the grounds for the emergence of family relations in the family law doctrine. On the basis of the conducted research in the scientific article it is established that there are the following bases of occurrence of family relations, family rights and duties of participants of these relations: 1) lawful legal actions: the emergence of a de facto marriage; leaving the family in connection with the establishment of a separate residence of the spouses; non-removal of the child from the maternity hospital by the parents; acquisition of property; concluding an agreement between the parents on the child's place of residence; adoption of a child; adoption; state registration of marriage or residence by one family without marriage between the child's father (mother) and stepmother (stepfather); 2) illegal legal actions: marriage to a person who is already married; evasion of alimony; concluding a fictitious marriage; non-fulfillment of the obligation to register the child; nonsupport; refusal to grant permission for the child to go abroad without sufficient grounds; 3) legal actions to achieve the legal consequences of which require compliance with the procedure: marriage, voluntary recognition of paternity, adoption, divorce, marriage contract; 4) legal acts (transactions, including family contracts, administrative acts, including bodies of state registration of civil status, court decisions on granting the right to marry between the adopter's own child and the adopted child, as well as between children who have been adopted court decision to declare the marriage invalid, etc.); 5) legal events: the birth of a child or the death of a person; the child reaches a certain age; declaring a person dead. A variety of legal events in family law are also recognized terms established by law, contract of the parties or court decision; 6) legal status: kinship, kinship, pregnancy, incapacity for work, cohabitation, paternity, etc .; 7) legal fictions: recognition of marriage as invalid or unconcluded; recognition of property acquired during the marriage as joint joint property of the spouses; establishment of the regime of separate residence of the spouses; determining the origin of a child born as a result of the use of assisted reproductive technologies.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114779077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HOUSING","authors":"O. Chaikovskyi","doi":"10.15421/392149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15421/392149","url":null,"abstract":"Human rights as a phenomenon are, undoubtedly, the most important achievement of the modern era and the key element of civilizational development of global community; however, the range of duties that correspond to human rights must be taken into account as well. One of the major subjects in this system is the state, which bears the highest responsibility for protecting constitutional rights of its citizens. The “constitutional state” category used to characterize states with a sophisticated legal system is simultaneously distinguishable for high level of economic development, broad dissemination of democratic ideals and the priority of universal human values. However, this system is built on clearly defined legal priorities. The right to remedy is the measure and the guarantor of democratic society. With the proclamation of Ukraine as an independent state, the right of everyone to legal remedy became one of the fundamental, constitutionally guaranteed human rights. The human and citizen right to legal remedy belongs to the category of civil rights, and moreover, it contains a legal guarantee against abuse of power by particular persons, as well as by the government. Also, Article 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms provides for the right for an effective legal remedy. Embodied in the constitutions of the majority of developed states, it occupies a prominent place in the structure of the legal-constitutional status of a person and represents an indispensable factor. The right to justice is reflected in the fundamental principles of the judiciary. Therefore, this right consists of the following elements: accessibility of justice; the right to appeal and cassation appeal of court judgments; independence and impartiality of courts; equality of all participants of a judicial proceeding before law and court; the right to remedy; publicity of court trials; trial of the case in the shortest possible time provided by law. At the same time, protection of the right to housing necessitates fast resolution of disputable legal issues in certain cases, which court trials sometimes cannot guarantee.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125522568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"RELATIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF P. SKOROPADSKY AND THE REPRESENTATIVES OF GERMANY IN THE PROCESS OF CREATION OF THE AGRICULTURAL LEGISLATION (APRIL-NOVEMBER 1918)","authors":"O. Voloshko","doi":"10.15421/392141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15421/392141","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130365843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ON THE QUESTION OF THE DEFINITION AND ESSENCE OF THE PRINCIPLES\u0000OF CRIMINAL EXECUTIVE LAW","authors":"D. Pylypenko","doi":"10.15421/392167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15421/392167","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to defining the concept and essence of the principles of criminal executive law. The article analyzes the general theoretical concepts for defining the term “principles of law”. The author’s positions of the compilers of explanatory, etymological and other dictionaries on the definition of the principles of law are considered. The positions of domestic scholars in the field of criminal executive law on this issue are studied. It is noted that most definitions of the principles of criminal executive law are based solely on one aspect of criminal executive reality, which is the activity of execution of punishments. Based on this area of criminal executive activity, an idea of the current, basic provisions of the current criminal procedure law has been formed. The article emphasizes the mandatory consideration of such a direction as serving a sentence when determining the key, fundamental provisions of criminal executive law, taking into account the category of principles. This direction actually embodies the subjective composition, which according to the specifics of criminal-executive relations belongs to the sphere of serving sentences. First of all, this direction is related to the person of the convict, as well as other persons involved in this process. This category of persons also includes representatives of local authorities, self-government, public and religious organizations, etc. The article focuses on and expresses the author’s position on the definition of the principles of criminal executive law and mandatory consideration of key elements that fully reflect their essence. Such elements include the perception of principles as: 1) fundamental, conceptual ideas of the relevant branch of law; 2) criteria of subjective, human perception of events, phenomena within certain legal relations; 3) key elements of the structure and functioning of legal mechanisms. Given this, the principles of criminal executive law have the following meanings: a) doctrinal; b) perceptual; c) regulatory. The proposed elements fully reflect the substantive component of the principles of criminal executive law.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133966574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}