Philosophy of Science and Technology最新文献

Criticism of solipsism in the contexts of many-world models 多世界模型背景下对唯我论的批判

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2021-07-04 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-1-78-90

I. Karpenko

引用次数: 1

Cognitive science: from paradigms to theoretical complexes 认知科学:从范式到理论复合体

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2021-07-04 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-1-5-22

M. Sushchin

{"title":"Cognitive science: from paradigms to theoretical complexes","authors":"M. Sushchin","doi":"10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-1-5-22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-1-5-22","url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the task of understanding main theoretical movements in cognitive science, including classical computational cognitivism, connectionism, moderate embodied cognition, and predictive processing. For this purpose, the article analyzes the well-known post-positivist conceptions of philosophy of science developed by T. Kuhn, I. Lakatos, and L. Laudan, which focus not on individual theories, but on groups of theories. Despite the fact that all these well-known post-positivist conceptions describe well certain features of theoretical movements in cognitive science, none of them as such can be taken as a basis for understanding those cognitivist groups of theories and models. Thus, the article develops an alternative approach based on the author’s idea of theoretical complexes. With the help of this idea, it becomes possible, firstly, to characterize the form of organization of main theoretical movements in cognitive science. From this point of view, complexes of individual theories, models, and conceptions in cognitive science can be formed both on the basis of one common property or a number of common properties, and on the basis of family resemblance. And, secondly, the idea of theoretical complexes has made it possible to clarify the basic functions of cognitivist theoretical movements. These functions include the constructive function of a landmark for the supporters of one particular complex (including the subordinate functions of creating and modifying individual theories, defining their basic concepts, etc.). and the negative function of a target for criticism for supporters of competing complexes.","PeriodicalId":227944,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Science and Technology","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114948879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The myth of the three crises in foundations of mathematics Part 1 数学基础中的三次危机神话(上)

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2021-07-04 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-1-64-77

V. Shaposhnikov

{"title":"The myth of the three crises in foundations of mathematics Part 1","authors":"V. Shaposhnikov","doi":"10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-1-64-77","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-1-64-77","url":null,"abstract":"The story of “the three crises in foundations of mathematics” is widely popular in Russian publications on the philosophy of mathematics. This paper aims at evaluating this story against the background of the contemporary scholarship in the history of mathematics. The conclusion is that it should be considered as a specimen of modern myth-making activity brought to the fore by an unconscious tendency to model the whole history of mathematics on the pattern of the foundational crisis of the first decades of the 20th century. What is more, the consideration of the specific role and character of the foundations in both early Greek mathematics and 18th-century mathematics gives an occasion to raise a more general question regarding the true meaning of the historicity of mathematics. The first part of this paper deals with the point whether there was a foundational crisis in pre-Euclidean Greek mathematics caused by the discovery of incommensurable magnitudes and Zeno’s paradoxes. The result is negative: we have no direct historical evidence of such a crisis; as for secondary considerations, they also mainly count against it. The idea of the first crisis in foundations of mathematics has emerged as a result of the unjustified transference of the modern grasp of foundational issues and the modern “mentalité de crise” to the ancient past.","PeriodicalId":227944,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Science and Technology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121657547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Philosophy and sociology of technology in the XXI century: the problematic field of contemporary discussions 21世纪的技术哲学和社会学:当代讨论的问题领域

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2019-24-2-150-161

A. Baeva

引用次数: 1

Consciousness and cognitive mechanisms: theoretical and empirical investigations (a review) 意识与认知机制:理论与实证研究(综述)

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2019-24-2-21-32

M. Sushchin

引用次数: 0

Review of the book by Elena O. Trufanova "The subject and cognition in the world of social constructions" (Moscow: Kanon + ROOI "Rehabilitation", 2018. 320 pp.) 对Elena O. Trufanova《社会建构世界中的主体与认知》一书的评论(莫斯科:Kanon + ROOI“Rehabilitation”，2018年)。320页。)

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-2-122-130

J. S. Morkina

引用次数: 0

Qualia, representations and the magic of philosophical rooms 感觉，表征和哲学房间的魔力

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-2-73-88

I. Mikhailov

引用次数: 0

Autonomous robots learning and social integration on the basis of modern cognitive technologies 基于现代认知技术的自主机器人学习与社会整合

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-2-89-102

S. Diane

引用次数: 1

Realism vs constructivism in mathematics and natural sciences 数学与自然科学中的现实主义与建构主义

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-2-14-17

V. Bazhanov

引用次数: 0

The metaphorical foundations of computing in the cognitive sciences and the philosophy of mind 认知科学和心灵哲学中计算的隐喻基础

Philosophy of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-2-61-72

P. Baryshnikov

引用次数: 2