Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology最新文献_第2页

The Last Phases at Barikot: Urban Cults and Preliminary Chronology: Data from the 2012 Excavation Campaign in Swat 巴里科特的最后阶段:城市邪教和初步年表:来自2012年斯瓦特挖掘运动的数据

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAAA.5.107585

L. Olivieri

引用次数: 11

A Hunnish Kushan-shah 匈奴的贵霜国王

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.301930

Aman ur Rahman, F. Grenet, N. Sims-Williams

引用次数: 6

Dunhuang and the Origins of Zen Printing 敦煌与禅宗印刷术的起源

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.302545

T. Barrett

引用次数: 0

Elena E. Kuz’mina, The Origin of the Indo-Iranians and E. E. Kuzmina, The Prehistory of the Silk Road Elena E. Kuzmina，《印度-伊朗人的起源》和E. E. Kuzmina，《丝绸之路的史前史》

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAA.3.17

Burzine K. Waghmar

引用次数: 0

The Anau Seal and the Questions It Raises 阿瑙封印及其引发的问题

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.302555

Helen Wang, W. Tao

{"title":"The Anau Seal and the Questions It Raises","authors":"Helen Wang, W. Tao","doi":"10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.302555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.302555","url":null,"abstract":"In June 2000 a USA-Turkmen archaeological team excavating at the Anau site in southern Turkmenistan came across a seal, made of jet or lignite, bearing an apparently unknown script.1 The discovery aroused great interest in the Western press, which published special features about this “first word from Asia’s lost civilization” in April and May 2001.2 The seal immediately caught the attention of Chinese academics, and a number of articles swiftly appeared in Zhongguo wenwu bao [China Cultural Relics News].3 The Chinese scholars recognised this as a significant discovery, one that could not be ignored in the study of the origins of seals and writing in China. Additionally, it might throw new light on the early cultural exchanges between China and Central Asia. However, there are a number of unresolved problems regarding the context of the find, its date, and possible interpretations. In this paper, we will re-examine some of the issues. In order to pursue the question further, we will look more broadly at the archaeology of Central Asia and China, and in particular at the development of Chinese seals and at comparable examples from Chinese Central Asia (Xinjiang). The Anau site is located on the plateau north of the Kopet Mountains on the borders between Turkmenistan and Iran. It occupies a strategic location, at the crossroads of the ancient civilizations of Central Asia, Western Asia and India. The site was first discovered by General A.V. Komarov in 1880, and the first excavations, by geologist Raphael Pumpelly (1873-1959) and archaeologist Hubert Schmidt (1864-1933), began in the early twentieth century.4 Archaeologists from the Soviet Union soon became active in this region, working at the Anau site and the related sites of Namazga-depe, Altyn-depe and Kara-depe. The finds from these sites are typically representative of Chalcolithic and Bronze Age civilizations, and include human figures, textiles, ceramics and metalware. These Bronze Age sites have now been classified as the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC) and the periodization is currently determined according to the evidence of type sites, such as Namazga-depe.5 The early phase of the Anau culture (Anau IA) pre-dates the Chalcolithic, but a small quantity of copper ore has been found at Anau. Namazga-depe Phases I-III are characterised by the combined Bronze and Stone Age (37002500 BCE), and Phases IV-VI by the Bronze Age (2500-1000 BCE). As far as the development of seals is concerned, it is particularly noteworthy that terracotta seals have been found at Karadepe, which belongs to the Namazga-depe Phase III (3000-2500 BCE).6 The designs on the seals resemble a cross, and similar designs have also been found on pots from the site. Seals made of copper and stone have also been found at Shahr-i-Sokhta, a site with a similar date and also in southern Turkmenistan.7 The same cross designs are found on these seals, as well as animal symbols. Once in the Bronze Age, for example a","PeriodicalId":227814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115545294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

On the Question of Sasanian Presence in Sogdiana. Recent Results of Excavations at Paykand 论萨珊王朝在粟特尼亚的存在。最近在payland的挖掘结果

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAAA.4.2017005

A. V. Omel’chenko

引用次数: 3

“A Bone Pin From Kazakl’i-Yatkan/Akcha-Khan-Kala, Chorasmia”

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.302541

Fiona. Kidd

引用次数: 1

Some Begram Ivories and the South Indian Narrative Tradition: New Evidence 一些贝尔格拉姆象牙与南印度叙事传统:新证据

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAA.3.5

E. Stone

{"title":"Some Begram Ivories and the South Indian Narrative Tradition: New Evidence","authors":"E. Stone","doi":"10.1484/J.JIAA.3.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JIAA.3.5","url":null,"abstract":"Many of the Begram ivories rank amongst the finest works of art surviving from ancient India. Despite their profound interest, they are relatively small pieces of ivory and bone made in a wide variety of styles and techniques and probably by a large number of craftsmen from different regions and even at different times. The ivories were used to decorate wooden furniture, the wood having long since disintegrated. Many of them were imported from India and may have arrived in Begram already assembled into furniture while others may have been assembled somewhere near Begram, in eastern Bactria near the border of Gandhara (Map 1). The ivories were found in two sealed rooms, numbers 10 and 13, along with numerous other treasures that included bronzes and plaster casts of metalwork imported from the Greco-Roman world, Alexandrian glass, and lacquer work from China.1 Neither the site of the Begram hoard nor the accumulation of objects contained within it provides us with definitive dates. The hoard is culturally heterogeneous which certainly suggests that it is chronologically heterogeneous. The style of many of the ivories is Indian. Over the years, there has been much controversy as to their place of manufacture, as well as their date. They have been assigned to dates ranging from the first century BCE to the fourth century CE and have been compared to almost every major site of sculptural production within the Indian subcontinent. The reasons for this are intrinsic to the field of Indian art and archaeology. Since only a small percentage of ancient sites have been identified, excavated, and published, we are constantly restudying the same evidence over and over in hopes of somehow “redating” or “reassessing” them. Furthermore, the major regional sculptural schools were connected by trade routes and influenced each other so that styles frequently tended to comingle. Thus, despite the existence of clear regional styles, we often see forms or motifs in different regions at the same time.2 Further complicating the problem, India’s reverence for the past makes it difficult to separate that which is truly old from that which is merely archaizing. To date, none of the theories regarding the ivories are universally accepted, and I do not propose to definitively solve the problems of date and/or provenance in this paper. What I will do is to insist upon the importance of the southern Indian contribution to the style and motifs of the Begram ivories The Begram hoard was first excavated between 1937 and 1939 by Joseph Hackin and his wife Ria, and their initial publication of the hoard in the Mémoires de la Délégation archéologiques française en Afghanistan 9 appeared shortly thereafter.3 With regard to the ivories, Hackin compared some of them to Stupa I at Sanchi, while one very important one, Coffret IX (Fig. 6),4 he placed from the end of the third to the beginning of the fourth century CE.5 His second publication was posthumous, as he and his wife were both ","PeriodicalId":227814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124546947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14

A New Coin Type Of The Khalaj 一种新的哈拉吉硬币类型

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.301931

M. Alram, Ciro LoMuzio

引用次数: 1

Yulin Cave 39 and Uygur Patronage: Origin and Transmittal of the Theme of Guanyin with Luohans 榆林39号洞与维吾尔族赞助:罗汉观音主题的起源与传承

Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1484/J.JIAAA.5.107592

M. Gridley

引用次数: 0