Stetson University College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Lightening the VA's Rucksack: A Proposal for Higher Education Medical-Legal Partnerships to Assist the VA in Efficiently and Accurately Granting Veterans Disability Compensation 减轻退伍军人的背包:高等教育医疗法律合作伙伴关系的建议,以协助退伍军人事务部有效和准确地给予退伍军人残疾赔偿
Stetson University College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2539266
Stacey-Rae Simcox
{"title":"Lightening the VA's Rucksack: A Proposal for Higher Education Medical-Legal Partnerships to Assist the VA in Efficiently and Accurately Granting Veterans Disability Compensation","authors":"Stacey-Rae Simcox","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2539266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2539266","url":null,"abstract":"The struggles of veterans to navigate the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) mammoth bureaucracy flash across our news screens every evening and Congress regularly holds hearings to address the many billions of dollars spent on unsuccessful solutions. According to the VA, 1.5 million new claims for disability benefits are expected to be filed in 2015, which represents an increase of 20% over 2014 numbers. Veterans who wait many months to years for a decision, often accept the VA’s denial of benefits and never file an appeal. For many veterans, this is a bad choice. Only approximately three and a half percent of claims are appealed past the first level of administrative review to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. The Board remands or reverses an incredible 73% of the VA decisions it reviews. Appeals to the federal court, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, account for approximately one half of one percent of all veterans’ claims filed. In the VA and Board decisions it reviews, the court consistently finds that in a majority of the cases the government is unjustifiably withholding benefits from veterans. Add to these statistics the VA’s heavy reliance on what the VA’s Inspector General has called “incompetent” medical evidence to make these decisions. It is easy to see that the VA needs help to administer benefits to veterans and why veterans need assistance navigating this process.This article is written in recognition of the facts and statistics that point to the reality that the VA is a titanic bureaucracy that is unlikely to deliver benefits to veterans efficiently or effectively in its current state. While change of the entire system is desirable, radical change is doubtful to happen quickly or efficiently. In light of this reality, this article proposes a unique solution to the problem: a medical-legal collaboration between law and medical schools. This interdisciplinary approach allows veterans to benefit from skilled advocacy and advice at the most essential stages of a claim at no cost to the veteran. Veterans can also receive thorough, competent, and specialized evaluations and opinions at little to no cost from medical students under the supervision of licensed faculty. Through this partnership, law and medical students learn critical skills that will impact their future practices. They also gain the essential ability to understand and appreciate the impact of other professionals on the client/patient they engage. Finally, this type of collaboration helps the VA make accurate decisions more efficiently.This type of cutting-edge medical-legal collaboration has been successfully implemented only at Stetson University’s College of Law and William & Mary Law School to date. The data from these collaborations demonstrates, among other things, that when medical (including mental health graduate clinical) students and law students collaborate they convince the VA to reverse a previous decision on a veteran’s claim 82% of the time. Adding ","PeriodicalId":227410,"journal":{"name":"Stetson University College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127632144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信