减轻退伍军人的背包:高等教育医疗法律合作伙伴关系的建议,以协助退伍军人事务部有效和准确地给予退伍军人残疾赔偿

Stacey-Rae Simcox
{"title":"减轻退伍军人的背包:高等教育医疗法律合作伙伴关系的建议,以协助退伍军人事务部有效和准确地给予退伍军人残疾赔偿","authors":"Stacey-Rae Simcox","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2539266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The struggles of veterans to navigate the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) mammoth bureaucracy flash across our news screens every evening and Congress regularly holds hearings to address the many billions of dollars spent on unsuccessful solutions. According to the VA, 1.5 million new claims for disability benefits are expected to be filed in 2015, which represents an increase of 20% over 2014 numbers. Veterans who wait many months to years for a decision, often accept the VA’s denial of benefits and never file an appeal. For many veterans, this is a bad choice. Only approximately three and a half percent of claims are appealed past the first level of administrative review to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. The Board remands or reverses an incredible 73% of the VA decisions it reviews. Appeals to the federal court, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, account for approximately one half of one percent of all veterans’ claims filed. In the VA and Board decisions it reviews, the court consistently finds that in a majority of the cases the government is unjustifiably withholding benefits from veterans. Add to these statistics the VA’s heavy reliance on what the VA’s Inspector General has called “incompetent” medical evidence to make these decisions. It is easy to see that the VA needs help to administer benefits to veterans and why veterans need assistance navigating this process.This article is written in recognition of the facts and statistics that point to the reality that the VA is a titanic bureaucracy that is unlikely to deliver benefits to veterans efficiently or effectively in its current state. While change of the entire system is desirable, radical change is doubtful to happen quickly or efficiently. In light of this reality, this article proposes a unique solution to the problem: a medical-legal collaboration between law and medical schools. This interdisciplinary approach allows veterans to benefit from skilled advocacy and advice at the most essential stages of a claim at no cost to the veteran. Veterans can also receive thorough, competent, and specialized evaluations and opinions at little to no cost from medical students under the supervision of licensed faculty. Through this partnership, law and medical students learn critical skills that will impact their future practices. They also gain the essential ability to understand and appreciate the impact of other professionals on the client/patient they engage. Finally, this type of collaboration helps the VA make accurate decisions more efficiently.This type of cutting-edge medical-legal collaboration has been successfully implemented only at Stetson University’s College of Law and William & Mary Law School to date. The data from these collaborations demonstrates, among other things, that when medical (including mental health graduate clinical) students and law students collaborate they convince the VA to reverse a previous decision on a veteran’s claim 82% of the time. Adding to these statistics that point to higher than normal grants of benefits in complicated claims for post-traumatic stress disorder, the quantitative results of a medical-legal collaboration are immeasurable.To examine this distinctive proposal, Part I of this article will discuss the VA disability compensation benefits system and the challenges facing the VA in delivering these benefits. Part II will argue that the veteran’s need for a trained advocate during the claims process is absolute and should be filled, despite the VA’s hesitancy to allow attorneys to enter the fray. Part III will examine the veteran’s need for independent medical evidence. Finally, Part IV will propose that law students, medical students, and other professional graduate students are a vast untapped resource that are distinctively equipped to fill these needs by discussing results realized from this type of collaboration and the benefits to all involved. The conclusion of the article is a recognition that all involved in this collaboration, veterans, students, and the VA, benefit tremendously from this partnership.","PeriodicalId":227410,"journal":{"name":"Stetson University College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lightening the VA's Rucksack: A Proposal for Higher Education Medical-Legal Partnerships to Assist the VA in Efficiently and Accurately Granting Veterans Disability Compensation\",\"authors\":\"Stacey-Rae Simcox\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2539266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The struggles of veterans to navigate the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) mammoth bureaucracy flash across our news screens every evening and Congress regularly holds hearings to address the many billions of dollars spent on unsuccessful solutions. According to the VA, 1.5 million new claims for disability benefits are expected to be filed in 2015, which represents an increase of 20% over 2014 numbers. Veterans who wait many months to years for a decision, often accept the VA’s denial of benefits and never file an appeal. For many veterans, this is a bad choice. Only approximately three and a half percent of claims are appealed past the first level of administrative review to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. The Board remands or reverses an incredible 73% of the VA decisions it reviews. Appeals to the federal court, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, account for approximately one half of one percent of all veterans’ claims filed. In the VA and Board decisions it reviews, the court consistently finds that in a majority of the cases the government is unjustifiably withholding benefits from veterans. Add to these statistics the VA’s heavy reliance on what the VA’s Inspector General has called “incompetent” medical evidence to make these decisions. It is easy to see that the VA needs help to administer benefits to veterans and why veterans need assistance navigating this process.This article is written in recognition of the facts and statistics that point to the reality that the VA is a titanic bureaucracy that is unlikely to deliver benefits to veterans efficiently or effectively in its current state. While change of the entire system is desirable, radical change is doubtful to happen quickly or efficiently. In light of this reality, this article proposes a unique solution to the problem: a medical-legal collaboration between law and medical schools. This interdisciplinary approach allows veterans to benefit from skilled advocacy and advice at the most essential stages of a claim at no cost to the veteran. Veterans can also receive thorough, competent, and specialized evaluations and opinions at little to no cost from medical students under the supervision of licensed faculty. Through this partnership, law and medical students learn critical skills that will impact their future practices. They also gain the essential ability to understand and appreciate the impact of other professionals on the client/patient they engage. Finally, this type of collaboration helps the VA make accurate decisions more efficiently.This type of cutting-edge medical-legal collaboration has been successfully implemented only at Stetson University’s College of Law and William & Mary Law School to date. The data from these collaborations demonstrates, among other things, that when medical (including mental health graduate clinical) students and law students collaborate they convince the VA to reverse a previous decision on a veteran’s claim 82% of the time. Adding to these statistics that point to higher than normal grants of benefits in complicated claims for post-traumatic stress disorder, the quantitative results of a medical-legal collaboration are immeasurable.To examine this distinctive proposal, Part I of this article will discuss the VA disability compensation benefits system and the challenges facing the VA in delivering these benefits. Part II will argue that the veteran’s need for a trained advocate during the claims process is absolute and should be filled, despite the VA’s hesitancy to allow attorneys to enter the fray. Part III will examine the veteran’s need for independent medical evidence. Finally, Part IV will propose that law students, medical students, and other professional graduate students are a vast untapped resource that are distinctively equipped to fill these needs by discussing results realized from this type of collaboration and the benefits to all involved. The conclusion of the article is a recognition that all involved in this collaboration, veterans, students, and the VA, benefit tremendously from this partnership.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stetson University College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stetson University College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2539266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stetson University College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2539266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

退伍军人在退伍军人事务部(VA)庞大的官僚机构中挣扎的故事每天晚上都会闪现在我们的新闻屏幕上,国会也会定期举行听证会,讨论在不成功的解决方案上花费的数十亿美元。根据退伍军人事务部的数据,2015年预计将有150万份新的残疾救济金申请,比2014年增加了20%。等待数月至数年才能得到决定的退伍军人,通常会接受退伍军人事务部拒绝发放福利的决定,从不提出上诉。对于许多老兵来说,这是一个糟糕的选择。只有大约3.5%的索赔通过第一级行政审查上诉到退伍军人上诉委员会。董事会对其审查的退伍军人管理局的决定进行了令人难以置信的73%的复审。向联邦法院,即退伍军人索赔上诉法院提出的上诉,约占所有退伍军人索赔的0.5%。在它审查的退伍军人管理局和委员会的决定中,法院一致认为,在大多数情况下,政府不合理地扣留了退伍军人的福利。再加上这些统计数据,退伍军人事务部严重依赖退伍军人事务部监察长所称的“不称职”的医学证据来做出这些决定。很容易看出,退伍军人事务部需要帮助来管理退伍军人的福利,以及为什么退伍军人在这个过程中需要帮助。写这篇文章是为了承认一些事实和统计数据,这些事实和统计数据表明,退伍军人管理局是一个庞大的官僚机构,在目前的状态下,不太可能有效地为退伍军人提供福利。虽然整个系统的改变是可取的,但彻底的改变能否迅速或有效地发生是值得怀疑的。鉴于这一现实,本文提出了一个独特的解决方案:法律和医学院之间的医学-法律合作。这种跨学科的方法允许退伍军人在索赔的最基本阶段从熟练的宣传和建议中受益,而不需要退伍军人支付任何费用。退伍军人还可以在有执照的教师的监督下,以很少甚至免费的方式从医学生那里得到彻底、称职和专业的评估和意见。通过这种伙伴关系,法律和医学专业的学生可以学到影响他们未来实践的关键技能。他们还获得了理解和欣赏其他专业人士对他们所接触的客户/病人的影响的基本能力。最后,这种类型的协作有助于VA更有效地做出准确的决策。迄今为止,这种尖端的医疗-法律合作仅在斯泰森大学法学院和威廉玛丽法学院成功实施。这些合作的数据表明,当医学(包括心理健康专业的临床专业)学生和法律专业的学生合作时,有82%的情况下,他们能说服退伍军人事务部推翻之前对退伍军人索赔的决定。再加上这些统计数据表明,在复杂的创伤后应激障碍索赔中,比正常情况下给予的福利要高,医疗-法律合作的定量结果是不可估量的。为了研究这一独特的建议,本文的第一部分将讨论退伍军人事务部残疾补偿福利制度以及退伍军人事务部在提供这些福利方面面临的挑战。第二部分将争辩说,退伍军人在索赔过程中对训练有素的律师的需求是绝对的,应该得到满足,尽管退伍军人事务部对允许律师进入争论犹豫不决。第三部分将审查退伍军人对独立医学证据的需求。最后,第四部分将提出,法律学生、医学学生和其他专业研究生是一个巨大的未开发资源,通过讨论从这种类型的合作中实现的结果和对所有参与者的好处,他们有独特的装备来满足这些需求。这篇文章的结论是承认所有参与这种合作的人,退伍军人、学生和退伍军人事务部,都从这种伙伴关系中受益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lightening the VA's Rucksack: A Proposal for Higher Education Medical-Legal Partnerships to Assist the VA in Efficiently and Accurately Granting Veterans Disability Compensation
The struggles of veterans to navigate the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) mammoth bureaucracy flash across our news screens every evening and Congress regularly holds hearings to address the many billions of dollars spent on unsuccessful solutions. According to the VA, 1.5 million new claims for disability benefits are expected to be filed in 2015, which represents an increase of 20% over 2014 numbers. Veterans who wait many months to years for a decision, often accept the VA’s denial of benefits and never file an appeal. For many veterans, this is a bad choice. Only approximately three and a half percent of claims are appealed past the first level of administrative review to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. The Board remands or reverses an incredible 73% of the VA decisions it reviews. Appeals to the federal court, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, account for approximately one half of one percent of all veterans’ claims filed. In the VA and Board decisions it reviews, the court consistently finds that in a majority of the cases the government is unjustifiably withholding benefits from veterans. Add to these statistics the VA’s heavy reliance on what the VA’s Inspector General has called “incompetent” medical evidence to make these decisions. It is easy to see that the VA needs help to administer benefits to veterans and why veterans need assistance navigating this process.This article is written in recognition of the facts and statistics that point to the reality that the VA is a titanic bureaucracy that is unlikely to deliver benefits to veterans efficiently or effectively in its current state. While change of the entire system is desirable, radical change is doubtful to happen quickly or efficiently. In light of this reality, this article proposes a unique solution to the problem: a medical-legal collaboration between law and medical schools. This interdisciplinary approach allows veterans to benefit from skilled advocacy and advice at the most essential stages of a claim at no cost to the veteran. Veterans can also receive thorough, competent, and specialized evaluations and opinions at little to no cost from medical students under the supervision of licensed faculty. Through this partnership, law and medical students learn critical skills that will impact their future practices. They also gain the essential ability to understand and appreciate the impact of other professionals on the client/patient they engage. Finally, this type of collaboration helps the VA make accurate decisions more efficiently.This type of cutting-edge medical-legal collaboration has been successfully implemented only at Stetson University’s College of Law and William & Mary Law School to date. The data from these collaborations demonstrates, among other things, that when medical (including mental health graduate clinical) students and law students collaborate they convince the VA to reverse a previous decision on a veteran’s claim 82% of the time. Adding to these statistics that point to higher than normal grants of benefits in complicated claims for post-traumatic stress disorder, the quantitative results of a medical-legal collaboration are immeasurable.To examine this distinctive proposal, Part I of this article will discuss the VA disability compensation benefits system and the challenges facing the VA in delivering these benefits. Part II will argue that the veteran’s need for a trained advocate during the claims process is absolute and should be filled, despite the VA’s hesitancy to allow attorneys to enter the fray. Part III will examine the veteran’s need for independent medical evidence. Finally, Part IV will propose that law students, medical students, and other professional graduate students are a vast untapped resource that are distinctively equipped to fill these needs by discussing results realized from this type of collaboration and the benefits to all involved. The conclusion of the article is a recognition that all involved in this collaboration, veterans, students, and the VA, benefit tremendously from this partnership.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信