{"title":"Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 9 lipca 2020 r. II KK 182/19 / Comment on the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 9 July 2020 II KK 182/19","authors":"Zygmunt Kukuła","doi":"10.53024/9.1.49.2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53024/9.1.49.2023","url":null,"abstract":"The criminal provision of Article 586 of the Code of Commercial Companies and Partnerships which criminalizes the offence of failure to file for bankruptcy of a commercial company, is a provision with a referral to another legal regulation. Therefore, when considering the grounds for criminal liability, it is necessary to refer to the Bankruptcy Law which defines in detail the grounds for insolvency and the deadline for filing a bankruptcy petition with the court. In view of the possible changes to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Law, wherever we examine the criminal liability of the liable person, it should be determined whether the provisions which the referral provision refers to, in this case the Bankruptcy Law, have not changed as at the date of delivering the judgment on criminal liability and at the time the alleged act was committed. In the event of changes to the Bankruptcy Law, any uncertainties as to the applicable law should be resolved guided by the conflict of law rules laid down in Article 4 of the Criminal Code. Based on the arguments presented in the article, the state of insolvency should be determined in accordance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Law in force as at the date of the ruling as being more favourable for the perpetrator.\u0000Key words: bankruptcy, criminal law, conflict-of-law rules of criminal law, grounds for bankruptcy, provision of criminal law containing a referral to another legal regulation","PeriodicalId":224822,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Krajowej Szkoły Sądownictwa i Prokuratury","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124217063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Stosowanie tymczasowego aresztowania wobec oskarżonych odbywających karę pozbawienia wolności w innej sprawie / Applying pre-trial detention to convicted to imprisonment in another case.","authors":"D. Sip","doi":"10.53024/3.1.49.2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53024/3.1.49.2023","url":null,"abstract":"The polish legislator made the correct application of all preventive measures conditional on the requirement to achieve the purposes from article 249 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Therefore, it is unacceptable in the current legal situation to use these measures without achieving the indicated goals. At the same time, it is normatively permissible to apply preventive measures, including pre-trial detention, to convicted who are already serving a sentence of imprisonment in another case. However, the current model of regulating this structure should lead to the formulation of a few reservations. This study expresses the author’s doubts as it is possible to apply pre-trial detention to convicts already serving a sentence of imprisonment in a case other than the ongoing preparatory proceedings. A side analysis was also carried out on the possibility of using other, except pre-trial detention, preventive measures against the convicted, as well as the possibility of using other criminal law instruments to secure the proper course of the preparatory proceedings and to prevent the convicted from committing a new, serious crime.\u0000Key words: preventive measures, pre-trial detention, convicted, purpose of applying pre-trial detention","PeriodicalId":224822,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Krajowej Szkoły Sądownictwa i Prokuratury","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133902285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Materiały kontroli operacyjnej w rzetelnym procesie karnym – jawne czy niejawne?\u0000Operational Control Material in a Fair Criminal Trial: Public or Classified?","authors":"Michał Blajerski","doi":"10.53024/4.1.49.2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53024/4.1.49.2023","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to determine whether the use of operational control materials as trial evidence, with due regard to their secrecy protected under a ‘classified’ clause, consequently results in a fair criminal trial. Reflections on this subject, also against the background of selected court decisions, have been illustrated with examples of a destructive impact of secrecy of operational control materials on the implementation of the principles of speed and openness of the criminal procedure and respect for the right to defence. At the same time, the admissible ways of solving the dilemmas arising at this level, consisting in the initiatives used by the procedural bodies aimed at removing secrecy clauses from the discussed materials, were presented in an approving light. Above all, however, in this context the author made an attempt to demonstrate that evidence based on operational control materials does not, in principle, deserve any special protection in a criminal trial and, except for a few cases, it should de lege lata be public. Finally, the theses presented in the article call into question, on the basis of the applicable legal regulations, the current practice in the field of providing operational control materials labelled as classified for the purposes of criminal proceedings.\u0000Key words: operational control, secrecy clause, confidentiality clause, secret, confidential, classified, fair trial","PeriodicalId":224822,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Krajowej Szkoły Sądownictwa i Prokuratury","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114228384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}