Landmark EssaysPub Date : 1981-02-01DOI: 10.1080/00335638109383547
Stephen E. Lucas
{"title":"The Schism in Rhetorical Scholarship","authors":"Stephen E. Lucas","doi":"10.1080/00335638109383547","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638109383547","url":null,"abstract":"There has developed in recent years a growing sense of schism dividing history from criticism in the study of public address. This essay reassesses the relationship between history and criticism with respect to intrinsic and extrinsic analysis, the role of evaluation in rhetorical scholarship, and the nature of critical and historical method.","PeriodicalId":224491,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Essays","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132670864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Landmark EssaysPub Date : 1977-04-01DOI: 10.1080/00335637709383372
Barnet Baskerville
{"title":"Must We All Be “Rhetorical Critics”?","authors":"Barnet Baskerville","doi":"10.1080/00335637709383372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637709383372","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":224491,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Essays","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1977-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128145896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Landmark EssaysPub Date : 1976-08-01DOI: 10.1080/03637757609375934
Keith V. Erickson
{"title":"The Lost Rhetorics of Aristotle","authors":"Keith V. Erickson","doi":"10.1080/03637757609375934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757609375934","url":null,"abstract":"Our understanding of Aristotle's theory of rhetoric is incomplete as little is known of the content or philosophy of his lost rhetorics. Although ancient testimonia alludes to as many as nine Aristotelian rhetorics, modern scholarship recognizes four (including the extant Rhetoric). This article examines Aristotle's lost rhetorics and their influence upon his philosophy of rhetorical discourse.","PeriodicalId":224491,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Essays","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1976-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133749264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Landmark EssaysPub Date : 1974-10-01DOI: 10.1080/00335637409383242
M. Leff, G. P. Mohrmann
{"title":"Lincoln at Cooper Union: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Text","authors":"M. Leff, G. P. Mohrmann","doi":"10.1080/00335637409383242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637409383242","url":null,"abstract":"Seeking the presidential nomination, Lincoln attempts to ingratiate himself with a Republican audience, and after an extensive attack upon Douglas, he creates a mock debate with the South and appeals for Republican unity. Each section features controlled argument, builds in intensity, and rests upon an association between Republican and the founding fathers, Lincoln using arrangement, argument, and style to associate self and party with the fathers and to dissociate self and party from his chief rivals.","PeriodicalId":224491,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Essays","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1974-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122930700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Landmark EssaysPub Date : 1966-11-01DOI: 10.1080/03637756609375508
Hermann G. Stelzner
{"title":"“War Message,” December 8, 1941: An Approach To Language","authors":"Hermann G. Stelzner","doi":"10.1080/03637756609375508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756609375508","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewers have pointed to difficulties. Arnold's review of Nichols' work asks for a sample of the criticism \"I am exhorted to produce. . . .\" He feels that Nichols \"does not illustrate in pointed ways how criticism may, in practice, resolve the . . . issues raised. . . .\" Responding to Black's work, Ehninger agrees with Black's assessment of much criticism but believes Black's alternatives \"are not worked out in enough detail to be viable.\" The \"ingredients . . . are not developed into anything approaching a critical method\" nor are \"characteristics and possibilities . . . systematized into a program of attack and procedure which the critic . . . may apply.\" Yet neither Black nor Nichols set out to develop systems. Black observes:","PeriodicalId":224491,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Essays","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1966-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133878922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Landmark EssaysPub Date : 1958-02-01DOI: 10.1080/00335635809382273
Carroll C. Arnold
{"title":"Lord Thomas Erskine: Modern Advocate","authors":"Carroll C. Arnold","doi":"10.1080/00335635809382273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335635809382273","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":224491,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Essays","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1958-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125348007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Landmark EssaysPub Date : 1947-04-01DOI: 10.1080/00335634709381280
A. C. Baird, Lester Thonssen
{"title":"Methodology in the Criticism of Public Address","authors":"A. C. Baird, Lester Thonssen","doi":"10.1080/00335634709381280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335634709381280","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":224491,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Essays","volume":"283 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1947-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120895668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：