Working Paper Series - National Bureau of Economic Research (Massachusetts)|2021. (w29551):unpaginated. 37 ref.最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Has Global Agricultural Trade Been Resilient Under Covid-19? Findings from an Econometric Assessment of 2020 2019冠状病毒病疫情下,全球农业贸易有韧性吗?2020年计量经济评估的结果
Shawn Arita, Jason H. Grant, Sharon S. Sydow, Jayson Beckman
{"title":"Has Global Agricultural Trade Been Resilient Under Covid-19? Findings from an Econometric Assessment of 2020","authors":"Shawn Arita, Jason H. Grant, Sharon S. Sydow, Jayson Beckman","doi":"10.3386/w29551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w29551","url":null,"abstract":"Global agricultural trade, which increased at the end of 2020, has been described as \"resilient\" to the impacts of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic;however, the size and channels of its quantitative impacts are not clear. Using a reduced-form, gravity-based econometric model for monthly trade, the researchers estimate the effects of COVID-19 incidence rates, policy restrictions imposed by governments to curb the outbreak, and the de facto reduction in human mobility/lockdown effect on global agricultural trade through the end of 2020. The researchers find that while agricultural trade remained quite stable through the pandemic, the sector as a whole did not go unscathed. First, the researchers estimate that COVID-19 reduced agricultural trade by the approximate range of 5 to 10 percent at the aggregate sector level;a quantified impact two to three times smaller in magnitude than our estimated impact on trade occurring in the non-agricultural sector. Second, the researchers find sharp differences across individual commodities. In particular, the researchers find that non-food items (hides and skins, ethanol, cotton, and other commodities), meat products including seafood, and higher value agri-food products were most severely impacted by the pandemic;however, the COVID- 19 trade effect for the majority of food and bulk agricultural commodity sectors were found to be insignificant, or in a few cases, positive. Finally, the researchers also examine the effects across low vs high income countries, the changing dynamics of the pandemic's effect on trade flows, and the effects along the extensive product margins of trade.","PeriodicalId":224369,"journal":{"name":"Working Paper Series - National Bureau of Economic Research (Massachusetts)|2021. (w29551):unpaginated. 37 ref.","volume":"76 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114017055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信