Has Global Agricultural Trade Been Resilient Under Covid-19? Findings from an Econometric Assessment of 2020

Shawn Arita, Jason H. Grant, Sharon S. Sydow, Jayson Beckman
{"title":"Has Global Agricultural Trade Been Resilient Under Covid-19? Findings from an Econometric Assessment of 2020","authors":"Shawn Arita, Jason H. Grant, Sharon S. Sydow, Jayson Beckman","doi":"10.3386/w29551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global agricultural trade, which increased at the end of 2020, has been described as \"resilient\" to the impacts of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic;however, the size and channels of its quantitative impacts are not clear. Using a reduced-form, gravity-based econometric model for monthly trade, the researchers estimate the effects of COVID-19 incidence rates, policy restrictions imposed by governments to curb the outbreak, and the de facto reduction in human mobility/lockdown effect on global agricultural trade through the end of 2020. The researchers find that while agricultural trade remained quite stable through the pandemic, the sector as a whole did not go unscathed. First, the researchers estimate that COVID-19 reduced agricultural trade by the approximate range of 5 to 10 percent at the aggregate sector level;a quantified impact two to three times smaller in magnitude than our estimated impact on trade occurring in the non-agricultural sector. Second, the researchers find sharp differences across individual commodities. In particular, the researchers find that non-food items (hides and skins, ethanol, cotton, and other commodities), meat products including seafood, and higher value agri-food products were most severely impacted by the pandemic;however, the COVID- 19 trade effect for the majority of food and bulk agricultural commodity sectors were found to be insignificant, or in a few cases, positive. Finally, the researchers also examine the effects across low vs high income countries, the changing dynamics of the pandemic's effect on trade flows, and the effects along the extensive product margins of trade.","PeriodicalId":224369,"journal":{"name":"Working Paper Series - National Bureau of Economic Research (Massachusetts)|2021. (w29551):unpaginated. 37 ref.","volume":"76 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working Paper Series - National Bureau of Economic Research (Massachusetts)|2021. (w29551):unpaginated. 37 ref.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w29551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Global agricultural trade, which increased at the end of 2020, has been described as "resilient" to the impacts of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic;however, the size and channels of its quantitative impacts are not clear. Using a reduced-form, gravity-based econometric model for monthly trade, the researchers estimate the effects of COVID-19 incidence rates, policy restrictions imposed by governments to curb the outbreak, and the de facto reduction in human mobility/lockdown effect on global agricultural trade through the end of 2020. The researchers find that while agricultural trade remained quite stable through the pandemic, the sector as a whole did not go unscathed. First, the researchers estimate that COVID-19 reduced agricultural trade by the approximate range of 5 to 10 percent at the aggregate sector level;a quantified impact two to three times smaller in magnitude than our estimated impact on trade occurring in the non-agricultural sector. Second, the researchers find sharp differences across individual commodities. In particular, the researchers find that non-food items (hides and skins, ethanol, cotton, and other commodities), meat products including seafood, and higher value agri-food products were most severely impacted by the pandemic;however, the COVID- 19 trade effect for the majority of food and bulk agricultural commodity sectors were found to be insignificant, or in a few cases, positive. Finally, the researchers also examine the effects across low vs high income countries, the changing dynamics of the pandemic's effect on trade flows, and the effects along the extensive product margins of trade.
2019冠状病毒病疫情下,全球农业贸易有韧性吗?2020年计量经济评估的结果
全球农业贸易在2020年底出现增长,被描述为对COVID-19冠状病毒大流行的影响具有“弹性”;然而,其量化影响的规模和渠道尚不清楚。研究人员使用简化形式的、基于重力的月度贸易计量经济学模型,估计了到2020年底,COVID-19发病率、各国政府为遏制疫情而实施的政策限制以及人员流动性实际减少/封锁效应对全球农业贸易的影响。研究人员发现,虽然农业贸易在疫情期间保持相当稳定,但整个农业部门并非毫发无损。首先,研究人员估计,2019冠状病毒病在整个部门层面使农业贸易减少了大约5%至10%,这一量化影响的幅度比我们对非农业部门贸易的估计影响小两到三倍。其次,研究人员发现不同商品之间存在巨大差异。研究人员特别发现,受疫情影响最严重的是非食品产品(兽皮、乙醇、棉花和其他商品)、包括海鲜在内的肉类产品和高价值农产品;然而,对大多数食品和大宗农产品部门的贸易影响微不足道,甚至在少数情况下是积极的。最后,研究人员还研究了低收入国家和高收入国家的影响、疫情对贸易流动影响的动态变化,以及对广泛的贸易产品边际的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信