J. Phonetics最新文献_第2页

Coarticulation of hand height in Sign Language of the Netherlands is affected by contact type 荷兰手语手高的协同发音受接触类型的影响

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2013-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.001

E. Ormel, O. Crasborn, E. V. D. Kooij

引用次数: 12

Perception of the short vs. long phonological category in Estonian by native and non-native listeners 母语和非母语听众对爱沙尼亚语短与长语音类别的感知

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2011-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.01.005

Lya Meister, E. Meister

引用次数: 19

Prosodic conditioning of phonetic detail in German plosives 德语爆破词语音细节的韵律制约

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2011-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.01.001

Claudia Kuzla, M. Ernestus

引用次数: 30

Perceptual asymmetries and stimulus dominance in dichotic listening with natural fricatives 自然摩擦音的知觉不对称和刺激优势

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2011-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.003

D. Voyer, Susan D. Voyer

引用次数: 0

Visual prosody of newsreaders: Effects of information structure, emotional content and intended audience on facial expressions 新闻播音员视觉韵律:信息结构、情感内容和目标受众对面部表情的影响

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.10.002

M. Swerts, E. Krahmer

引用次数: 62

The role of syllable structure in external sandhi: An EPG study of vocalisation and retraction in word-final English /l/ 音节结构在外部变调中的作用:英语词尾/l/的发声和缩回的EPG研究

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.10.005

J. Scobbie, M. Pouplier

引用次数: 64

Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent 语音生成技能习得中特征单位的证据:外国口音的语言结构

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2009-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.06.001

K. D. Jong, Yen-Chen Hao, Hanyong Park

引用次数: 46

Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis 荷兰语和意大利语信息地位的韵律标记比较分析

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2002-10-01 DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2002.0178

M. Swerts, E. Krahmer, Cinzia Avesani

{"title":"Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis","authors":"M. Swerts, E. Krahmer, Cinzia Avesani","doi":"10.1006/jpho.2002.0178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0178","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports on a comparative analysis of accentuation strategies within Italian and Dutch noun phrases (NPs). Its goal is not only to gain insight into what speakers do, but also into how listeners' perception and interpretation of incoming speech in different languages is affected by the distribution of accents. To this end, use is made of a particular experimental paradigm, which makes it possible to compare accent patterns in different languages from an acoustic, perceptual and functional point of view. Accent patterns were obtained via a simple dialogue game played by eight Dutch speakers and eight Italian ones. In this way, target descriptions of all speakers were obtained in the following four contexts: all new, single contrast in the adjective, single contrast in the noun, and double contrast. The accent patterns in these Dutch and Italian utterances were then compared in three different studies. Study 1 looks at accent distribution and finds that, in Dutch, new and contrastive information are accented, while given information is not; in Italian, distribution is not a significant factor in distinguishing information status, since within the elicited NPs both adjective and noun are always accented, irrespective of the status of the discourse context. Study 2 consists of prominence tests to investigate whether the accents differ in the degree of perceived emphasis. In Dutch, information status is reflected in these prominence differences: single contrastive accents are perceived to be the most emphatic, and given words the least emphatic. In Italian, it is less clear how gradient differences between accents can be linked to aspects of the discourse context. Study 3 presents a functional analysis of accent patterns exploring whether listeners are able to reconstruct a preceding utterance on the basis of prosodic properties of the current utterance. While this is possible for Dutch listeners, this is not at all the case for Italian listeners.","PeriodicalId":223246,"journal":{"name":"J. Phonetics","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115752333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 163

Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates 元音-元音协同发音的语言特定模式:声学结构及其感知相关性

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2002-10-01 DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2002.0177

P. S. Beddor, J. Harnsberger, Stephanie Lindemann

{"title":"Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates","authors":"P. S. Beddor, J. Harnsberger, Stephanie Lindemann","doi":"10.1006/jpho.2002.0177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0177","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Three experiments tested the hypothesis that V-to-V coarticulatory organization differs in Shona and English, and that Shona- and English-speaking listeners' sensitivity to V-to-V coarticulatory effects is correspondingly language-specific. An acoustic study of Shona and English CV′CVCV trisyllables (Experiment 1) showed that the two languages differ in the carryover vs. anticipatory influences of stressed and unstressed vowels on each other. In 4IAX discrimination tests in which both Shona and English coarticulatory effects were spliced into different coarticulatory contexts (Experiment 2), Shona and English listeners perceptually compensated more (i.e., attributed more of a vowel's acoustic properties to its coarticulatory context in targeted test trials) for effects that were consistent with their linguistic experience. Similarly, when these listeners identified synthetic target vowels embedded into different vowel contexts (Experiment 3), Shona listeners compensated more (i.e., showed larger category boundary shifts) for the vowel contexts that triggered larger acoustic influences in the production study. English listeners' boundary shifts were more complicated but, when these data were combined with those from a follow-up identification study, they showed the perceptual shifts expected on the basis of the English coarticulatory findings. Overall, the relation between the production and perception data suggests that listeners are attuned to native-language coarticulatory patterns.","PeriodicalId":223246,"journal":{"name":"J. Phonetics","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125408686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 216

Estimating lingual constriction location in high vowels: a comparison of EMA- and EPG-based measures 估计高元音的语言收缩位置:基于EMA和epg测量的比较

J. Phonetics Pub Date : 2002-07-01 DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2001.0158

L. Fitzpatrick, A. N. Chasaide

{"title":"Estimating lingual constriction location in high vowels: a comparison of EMA- and EPG-based measures","authors":"L. Fitzpatrick, A. N. Chasaide","doi":"10.1006/jpho.2001.0158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0158","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract EMA and EPG offer complementary information about tongue articulation. In this paper, comparisons are made of lingual constriction location estimates for high vowel continua, based on EMA and EPG data simultaneously recorded for one speaker. These data pertain to an experiment which correlated articulatory estimates of constriction location with formant measurements for comparison with Fant’s (1970) model-based nomograms. A circle model was used to estimate the constriction location from two dorsally located EMA sensors. The center of the constriction was deemed to be where the circle was closest to the roof of the mouth. Those estimates are compared to three types of EPG-based estimates of lingual constriction. The first is the row of narrowest constriction in a scaled vertical view of the EPG palate. The second is a “center of gravity” estimate. The third is an approximate side view of the tongue contour, drawn on the basis of the innermost activated electrode on each EPG row. Results suggest a broad agreement as well as consistent discrepancies between EMA and each EPG estimate. Likely reasons for discrepancies are discussed, and it is suggested that some of these may offer new insights into three-dimensional aspects of articulation that might be exploited in research.","PeriodicalId":223246,"journal":{"name":"J. Phonetics","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117525836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11