发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Ontology and the History of Economic Thought: An Introduction 本体论与经济思想史:导论
IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic) Pub Date : 2020-07-28 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3662269
P. Lewis, Mário da Graça Moura, Jochen Runde
{"title":"Ontology and the History of Economic Thought: An Introduction","authors":"P. Lewis, Mário da Graça Moura, Jochen Runde","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3662269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3662269","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the introduction to a special issue of the Cambridge Journal of Economics on the topic of ontology and the history of economic thought. It explains what is meant by social ontology and why ontological issues should be taken seriously by historians of economic thought. It then goes on to introduce the contributions to the special issue.","PeriodicalId":222265,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115131341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Endogenous Growth Theory and Radical Economics: New Perspective, Old Ideas? 内生增长理论与激进经济学:新视角，旧观念?
IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic) Pub Date : 2016-12-29 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2891455
António Neto
{"title":"Endogenous Growth Theory and Radical Economics: New Perspective, Old Ideas?","authors":"António Neto","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2891455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2891455","url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to understand the relationship between Radical Economics (RE) and Endogenous growth theory (EGT) based on a comparison of concepts and methods. Our findings include the existence of a set of common concepts, namely “power”, “conflict”, “technology” and “education”, but a different method of analysis: EGT uses a set of mathematical models to support its ideas, whereas RE seems to combine an appreciative approach with a mathematical framework after the mid 1980s.","PeriodicalId":222265,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132541119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信