{"title":"内生增长理论与激进经济学:新视角，旧观念?","authors":"António Neto","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2891455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to understand the relationship between Radical Economics (RE) and Endogenous growth theory (EGT) based on a comparison of concepts and methods. Our findings include the existence of a set of common concepts, namely “power”, “conflict”, “technology” and “education”, but a different method of analysis: EGT uses a set of mathematical models to support its ideas, whereas RE seems to combine an appreciative approach with a mathematical framework after the mid 1980s.","PeriodicalId":222265,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endogenous Growth Theory and Radical Economics: New Perspective, Old Ideas?\",\"authors\":\"António Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2891455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to understand the relationship between Radical Economics (RE) and Endogenous growth theory (EGT) based on a comparison of concepts and methods. Our findings include the existence of a set of common concepts, namely “power”, “conflict”, “technology” and “education”, but a different method of analysis: EGT uses a set of mathematical models to support its ideas, whereas RE seems to combine an appreciative approach with a mathematical framework after the mid 1980s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2891455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & History of Economic Thought (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2891455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endogenous Growth Theory and Radical Economics: New Perspective, Old Ideas?
This paper aims to understand the relationship between Radical Economics (RE) and Endogenous growth theory (EGT) based on a comparison of concepts and methods. Our findings include the existence of a set of common concepts, namely “power”, “conflict”, “technology” and “education”, but a different method of analysis: EGT uses a set of mathematical models to support its ideas, whereas RE seems to combine an appreciative approach with a mathematical framework after the mid 1980s.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
