发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Ancient Philosophy Today最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Front matter 前页
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2023.0083
{"title":"Front matter","authors":"","doi":"10.3366/anph.2023.0083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2023.0083","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135170512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘But not that which has lost its soul is what is potentially alive’ – The Relation between Body and Soul in Aristotle “但失去灵魂的东西并不是潜在的活着的东西”——亚里士多德《身体与灵魂的关系
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2023.0085
T. Buchheim
{"title":"‘But not that which has lost its soul is what is potentially alive’ – The Relation between Body and Soul in Aristotle","authors":"T. Buchheim","doi":"10.3366/anph.2023.0085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2023.0085","url":null,"abstract":"The thus far little noticed element in Aristotle's definition of the soul – namely, its nexus to the particularities of a complex physical body (σῶμα φυσικόν / sôma physikon) – is the key to resolve three apparent inconsistencies of Aristotelian hylomorphism: First, the incompatible modalities of the assumed binding relation between physical body as a simultaneously functional matter and the soul as its form; second, the homonymy problem, i.e., that, according to Aristotle's own statement, a body’s remnant that was abandoned by its soul can only homonymously be called that which it was when it was alive; third, the problem that form in hylomorphism seems to be nothing but a configuration of material parts, which, though conceptualised in abstraction and independent from matter, would nevertheless add nothing new to the material composition in which it is instantiated. If that were so, how, then, can a hylomorphic theory conceive of form as ontologically separate from matter? Without a comprehensive and comprehensible resolution of those three major aporias – that is in line with today’s scientific conception of the world – Aristotle’s definition of the soul as form-without-matter would, in Ackrill's words, ‘resist interpretation’. This paper shows that such a resolution can in fact be achieved and that Aristotle’s hylomorphism allows for a plausible and consistent interpretation.","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123782680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
James Warren, Regret: A Study in Ancient Moral Psychology 詹姆斯·沃伦:《后悔:古代道德心理学研究》
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2023.0088
Sadie McCloud
{"title":"James Warren, Regret: A Study in Ancient Moral Psychology","authors":"Sadie McCloud","doi":"10.3366/anph.2023.0088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2023.0088","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133176810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scott Berman, Platonism and the Objects of Science 斯科特·伯曼，《柏拉图主义与科学对象》
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2023.0087
Anna Marmodoro
{"title":"Scott Berman, Platonism and the Objects of Science","authors":"Anna Marmodoro","doi":"10.3366/anph.2023.0087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2023.0087","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134369133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Authority and the Dead Hand of the Past. Dworkin's Law's Empire and Plato's Laws on Legal Normativity 法律权威与过去的死手。德沃金的法律帝国与柏拉图关于法律规范性的法则
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2022.0078
Andrés Rosler
{"title":"Legal Authority and the Dead Hand of the Past. Dworkin's Law's Empire and Plato's Laws on Legal Normativity","authors":"Andrés Rosler","doi":"10.3366/anph.2022.0078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2022.0078","url":null,"abstract":"According to Ronald Dworkin's mature views on jurisprudence, legal normativity depends on judges’ views about political morality. Plato's own mature views on this subject seem to take the contrary position as he claims that the law is expected to be authoritative in order to preserve a given state of affairs. Therefore, in Plato's view judges are not expected to interpret the law ubiquitously according to their own standards of political morality. In what follows, the discussion starts off by offering a brief account of Dworkin's interpretivism and some of its shortcomings. We shall then move on to Plato's account of legal normativity, especially his views on the authority of law, law as preservation, and finally the politics of law in the light of the debate between conservatism and progressivism.","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130345124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plato on Legal Normativity 柏拉图论法律规范
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2022.0077
Christopher Bobonich
{"title":"Plato on Legal Normativity","authors":"Christopher Bobonich","doi":"10.3366/anph.2022.0077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2022.0077","url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to determine what laws’ most fundamental normative property is for Plato. After examining the Hippias Major and the pseudo-Platonic Minos, I argue that in the Laws this property is correctness ( orthotês) which is understood as maximizing the citizens’ happiness. I argue that laws failing to do so are defective as laws because they’re not partially grounded in the relevant ethical facts and that Plato is thus a natural law theorist. The last section provides further justification for the claim that laws failing the correctness criterion are defective as laws by appealing to Plato’s understanding of practical rationality.","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117102981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Normativity of Law in Nature Revisited: Natural Law in Late Hellenistic Thought 法在自然中的规范性:晚期希腊化思想中的自然法
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2022.0080
R. Brouwer
{"title":"The Normativity of Law in Nature Revisited: Natural Law in Late Hellenistic Thought","authors":"R. Brouwer","doi":"10.3366/anph.2022.0080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2022.0080","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I revisit nature as a source of normativity for law in the later Hellenistic period, that is beyond the opposition of law and nature in the early classical period, Plato’s and Aristotle’s naturalism, or the early Stoics’ conception of the common law. I will focus on the first century BCE, when the expression ‘natural law’ gained prominence, reconstructing its origins in the interaction between Hellenistic philosophers and the Roman elite, including jurists. I argue that for the jurists the Stoic doctrine of law in nature offered a theoretical underpinning for their unique practice of dispute resolution, whereas for the Stoics this Roman practice offered an unexpected opportunity to instrumentalise their conception of law.","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116359798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aristotle and Modern Constitutionalism 亚里士多德与现代立宪主义
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2022.0079
George Duke
{"title":"Aristotle and Modern Constitutionalism","authors":"George Duke","doi":"10.3366/anph.2022.0079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2022.0079","url":null,"abstract":"Any attempt to apply Aristotelian political categories to the principles of modern constitutionalism is undoubtedly at risk of anachronism. This paper acknowledges non-trivial differences between the Ancient Greek politeia, as theorised by Aristotle, and the modern constitution. It nonetheless argues that the central principles of the modern liberal constitution can be elucidated within the explanatory frame of the Aristotelian concept of the politeia as a political determination of institutional structures and competences oriented by an interpretation of the public good. The paper is divided in three sections. Section 1 outlines Aristotle’s account of the politeia. Section 2 considers some central principles of modern constitutionalism. Section 3 then examines these principles under an Aristotelian lens. The conclusion sketches a potential objection, implicit in the paper’s arguments, to a recent proposal for a ‘neo-Aristotelian’ normative constitutional theory.","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127480043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Law and the Metaethics of Discord 法律与不和的元伦理学
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2022.0076
K. Vogt
{"title":"Law and the Metaethics of Discord","authors":"K. Vogt","doi":"10.3366/anph.2022.0076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2022.0076","url":null,"abstract":"Plato’s Euthyphro, I argue, lays out a metaethics that responds to persistent and unresolved value disagreement. The dialogue’s analysis of disagreement leads to the distinction between three kinds of value, exemplified by the good, the god-loved, and the pious. With this proposal, I reject centuries of scholarship, which ascribe a realist metaethics to the Plato of the Euthyphro. But only the good and the just require a ‘realist’ analysis: we relate to them as features of the world to which we have attitudes, not as features of the world that are conferred by our attitudes. The god-loved is overtly attitudinal, thus calling for an anti-realist account. A compelling account of the pious has both realist and anti-realist dimensions. All three kinds of value, I argue, are to be found in the domain of law. Here, too, the good and the just require a realist, the legal an anti-realist, and the lawful a realist and anti-realist analysis. As important as piety was for millennia, it is a non-issue in today’s metaethics. But its analogue in the domain of the law, the lawful, plays a crucial role in our lives today. While we recognize legality as potentially flawed, respect for the law is an indispensable attitude if we are to strive towards improved lives and improved societies.","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133566740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Normativity of Law: Ancient and Contemporary Perspectives 法律的规范性:古代和当代的观点
Ancient Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.3366/anph.2022.0075
A. Hatzistavrou, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco
{"title":"The Normativity of Law: Ancient and Contemporary Perspectives","authors":"A. Hatzistavrou, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco","doi":"10.3366/anph.2022.0075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anph.2022.0075","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":222223,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy Today","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121561311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信