Isabelle Ts Koster, Matthijs M den Os, Martin Vh Rutten, Thibault Ri van den Dungen, Tim de Jong, Hay Ah Winters, Caroline Driessen
{"title":"The Effect of Regional Anaesthesia on Free Flap Survival in Lower Extremity Reconstructions.","authors":"Isabelle Ts Koster, Matthijs M den Os, Martin Vh Rutten, Thibault Ri van den Dungen, Tim de Jong, Hay Ah Winters, Caroline Driessen","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1612","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of different modalities of anaesthesia in microvascular free flap surgery has been a topic of ongoing debate. Comparative data to study the effect of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia in the form of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) on lower extremity free flap survival is lacking to date. This study aims to elucidate the effect of regional anaesthesia on flap survival in lower extremity free flap reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent free vascularised flap reconstruction of the lower extremities between 2012 and 2021 at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), The Netherlands, and between 2019 and 2021 at the Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. In this cohort, we analysed partial and total flap failures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort, 87 patients received a total of 102 microvascular free flap reconstructions of the lower extremity. In 20.5% of these operations, patients received a supplemental PNB. Total flap failure was 23.8% in the regional anaesthesia group compared to 21% in the group with general anaesthesia only (<i>p</i> = 0.779). Operation time was longer for patients with regional anaesthesia (<i>p</i> = 0.057). Length of stay was on average 2 days shorter for patients with supplemental regional anaesthesia (<i>p</i> = 0.716).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the largest cohort comparing flap survival in patients receiving general anaesthesia to general anaesthesia with a PNB in lower extremity reconstructions to date. We cannot attribute a significant beneficial or detrimental effect of regional anaesthesia to flap survival. High failure rates stress the need for future studies.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Koster ITS, den Os MM, Rutten MVH, <i>et al</i>. The Effect of Regional Anaesthesia on Free Flap Survival in Lower Extremity Reconstructions. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):15-20.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"19 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11091895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140945911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Obituary","authors":"William Eardley","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1593a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1593a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135513905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Taylor J Reif, Adam Geffner, Jason S Hoellwarth, Austin T Fragomen, S Robert Rozbruch
{"title":"Precice Stryde® Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail does not Impair Bone Healing Despite Radiographic and Clinical Symptoms.","authors":"Taylor J Reif, Adam Geffner, Jason S Hoellwarth, Austin T Fragomen, S Robert Rozbruch","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1514","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Precice Stryde® internal magnetic lengthening nail allowed many patients a full weight-bearing experience during femur and tibia lengthening, but concerns over corrosion, pain and radiographic changes led to the implant's recall. Despite the recall, it is important to understand the rate of these occurrences and their influence on the overall success of the lengthening procedure. We aimed to investigate radiographic changes, patient-reported symptoms and bone healing indices for our cohort of Stryde lengthening.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our surgical database and electronic medical record system were used to review and document patient demographics, indications for lengthening, length achieved, bone healing index (BHI), location and type of radiographic changes, time until radiographic changes were first visible, presence of pain symptoms (not attributable to surgery or distraction), time to implant removal and if the pain symptoms resolved following implant extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2019 to February 2021, 90 Stryde nails (78 femur and 12 tibia) were implanted in 63 patients. The cohort included 48 males and 15 females. The average length [± standard deviation (SD)] achieved was 58.4 ± 22.7 mm. The 66 bones (73%) developed radiographic changes and were found to be 58/78 (74%) femurs and 8/12 (67%) tibias. The average time to initial radiographic changes was 168 ± 108.1 days (femur) and 276 ± 126.8 days (tibia). Late-onset pain developed in 10 femur lengthening (11.1% of all nails) surgeries across eight patients (12.7% of all patients). All patients' pain resolved; three instances prior to nail removal and the remaining seven after nail removal. No patients were re-presented with worsening pain or radiographic changes following implant removal. Radiographic or symptomatic abnormalities did not impair bone formation. The BHI for femurs with (29.6 ± 16.6 days/cm, <i>n</i> = 58) vs without (29.4 ± 17.9 days/cm, <i>n</i> = 20) radiographic or symptomatic irregularity were nearly identical (<i>p</i> = 0.961). The difference between BHI for tibias with (39.3 ± 7.8 days/cm, <i>n</i> = 8) vs without (86.1 ± 38.2 days/cm, <i>n</i> = 4) radiographic changes was influenced by outliers and underpowered to draw a conclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bone lengthening with the Stryde nail was associated with high rates of radiographic abnormalities, but symptoms were uncommon and resolved with explantation. The radiographic changes did not affect bone healing in the femur.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Radiographic changes including bone hypertrophy and osteolysis were common after bone lengthening with the Stryde nail, but the development of pain following consolidation was rare and resolved with implant removal.The BHI in femurs was not affected by radiographic changes.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Reif TJ, Geffner A, Hoellwarth JS, <","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"94-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628610/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Re-use of Motorised Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Nails.","authors":"Andrew G Georgiadis, Nickolas J Nahm, Mark T Dahl","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1592","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study reviews the re-use of implanted motorised intramedullary lengthening nails previously used for limb lengthening.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on the re-use of motorised intramedullary lengthening nails. All patients had a magnetically controlled intramedullary lengthening nail in the femur, tibia, or humerus previously utilised for either lengthening or compression. Patients were included if the magnetically controlled intramedullary lengthening nail underwent attempted re-use either in the same lengthening episode or in a temporally separate lengthening treatment requiring another corticotomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients with 12 lengthening episodes were analysed including five tibial, five femoral and two humeral segments. Overall, seven of 12 nails (58%) were successfully re-deployed without the need for nail exchange. Two of three nails were successfully retracted and re-used for continued distraction in the same lengthening treatment. Five of nine nails (56%) were successfully reactivated in a subsequent, later lengthening episode.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-use of a magnetically controlled limb lengthening nail is an off-label technique that may be considered for patients requiring ongoing or later lengthening of the femur, tibia or humerus. Regardless of whether the nail is used in the same lengthening episode or separate lengthening episode, surgeons should be prepared for exchange to a new implant.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Re-use of a magnetically controlled intramedullary lengthening nail will reduce surgical trauma and save implant cost in limb lengthening treatment but may only be possible in half of attempted cases.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Georgiadis AG, Nahm NJ, Dahl MT. Re-use of Motorised Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Nails. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):106-110.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"106-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628613/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Cambridge Experience with Lower Limb Long Bone Non-union Following Fixation and the Treatment Algorithm.","authors":"Freideriki Poutoglidou, Matija Krkovic","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1589","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1589","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Non-unions have been traditionally classified as atrophic, oligotrophic and hypertrophic and their management was primarily dictated by that. In our Unit, we have based our treatment rationale mainly on the stability of the metalwork and the presence of symptoms rather than the radiologic appearance of the non-union or the presence of infection. The aim was to present the treatment algorithm for lower limb long bone non-union following operative fixation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients treated for a femoral or tibial non-union following fixation between 2014 and 2020 in our unit and with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Non-union was defined as having no evidence of fracture healing in any cortices six months after the index procedure. Union was defined as bridging callus in at least three cortices visualized on at least two orthogonal radiographs. Information retrieved included demographic and fracture characteristics, presence of infection, evidence of metalwork stability and treatment. Outcome measures included union rate, time to union and complications. Data were analysed with the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) using contingency tables and linear regression. A <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. Union was achieved in 91% of the cases, while union was noted in all the patients treated non-operatively. The mean time to union was 14.49 months (9.98). Complications were encountered in 20 of the patients and the most common were docking site non-union and metalwork breakage. Infection was the only factor that affected time to union in a statistically significant manner (<i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our study suggest that in cases of long bone non-union following operative fixation using signs of metalwork instability and the presence of clinical symptoms as the main indication for surgical intervention provides a satisfactory outcome. This approach prevented operative management in a large proportion of patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This article presents an algorithmic approach that could aid clinicians in their decision-making in long-bone non-union management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic level III.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Poutoglidou F, Krkovic M. The Cambridge Experience with Lower Limb Long Bone Non-union Following Fixation and the Treatment Algorithm. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):100-105.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher A Iobst, Danielle N Hatfield, Stephen D Forro, Stephen M Quinnan
{"title":"Magnetically Driven Intramedullary Limb Lengthening in Patients with Pre-existing Implanted Programmable Devices: A Case Series.","authors":"Christopher A Iobst, Danielle N Hatfield, Stephen D Forro, Stephen M Quinnan","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1590","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1590","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the use of magnetically controlled intramedullary nails in patient with programmable implantable devices.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetically driven intramedullary limb lengthening devices have revolutionised the field of limb reconstruction. Because the system is powered by strong magnets, there are warnings to avoid the use of the device in patients with implanted programmable devices, such as cardiac pacemakers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four patients with three different types of programmable implanted devices presented to two centres for limb lengthening and limb reconstruction. Each patient had a limb length discrepancy and desired correction using an intramedullary lengthening device. After thorough counselling about the potential risks and benefits of the procedure as well as discussions with each patient's medical team, the decision to proceed with surgery was made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four patients underwent osteoplasty with insertion of a magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nail. Goal length was achieved with successful consolidation and subsequent nail removal in all patients. There were no malfunctions of the implantable devices during the distraction phase in any of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With proper precautions, intramedullary lengthening can be performed safely and successfully using a magnetically driven nail in patients with previously implanted programmable devices.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This initial experience suggests use of magnetically controlled intramedullary nails in patient with programmable implantable devices can be undertaken safely within constraints of precautions.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Iobst CA, Hatfield DN, Forro SD, <i>et al</i>. Magnetically Driven Intramedullary Limb Lengthening in Patients with Pre-existing Implanted Programmable Devices: A Case Series. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):111-116.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628617/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ekansh Debuka, Patrick Birkenhead, Sohan Shah, Badri Narayan, Nikolaos Giotakis, Phillipa Thorpe, Simon Matthew Graham, Benjamin E Fischer, Nick Peterson
{"title":"Penthrox<sup>®</sup> (Methoxyflurane) as an Analgesic for Removal of Circular External Fixators and Minor Procedures during the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Ekansh Debuka, Patrick Birkenhead, Sohan Shah, Badri Narayan, Nikolaos Giotakis, Phillipa Thorpe, Simon Matthew Graham, Benjamin E Fischer, Nick Peterson","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1587","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1587","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Methoxyflurane has excellent analgesic properties and is approved for use in the United Kingdom and Ireland since 2015. It is currently used in emergency departments for analgesia during fracture reductions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, with theatre access severely restricted, Penthrox® had the potential to provide adequate pain relief to aid frame and wire removal in the clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients presenting to the limb reconstruction service elective clinic and requiring frame removal or minor procedures were included in the study. Patients with renal, cardiac or hepatic disease, a history of sensitivity to fluorinated anaesthetic agents and those on any nephrotoxic or enzyme-inducing drugs were excluded. All procedures were performed in an appropriate isolated room in the clinic. Patient demographics, procedure details, visual analogue score, Richmond Agitation Scale and patient satisfaction were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 patients were included in the study of which 17 had Ilizarov frames removed, 10 had hexapod removals, nine had heel rings removed and three had an external fixator removed. Eleven patients received additional pain relief in the form of oral analgesia. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the experience. One patient required a general anaesthetic for the removal of a wire that could not be removed in the clinic due to bony overgrowth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient satisfaction was very high (>95%), and it was possible to perform frame removals and minor procedures in the clinic environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. We see potential for regular use of Penthrox® in the future for the removal of external fixation outside of the operating theatre.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Penthrox as an analgesic for frame adjustments and removals is safe and has the potential for significant financial savings for the National Health Service (NHS).</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Debuka E, Birkenhead P, Shah S, <i>et al</i>. Penthrox® (Methoxyflurane) as an Analgesic for Removal of Circular External Fixators and Minor Procedures during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):82-86.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"82-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628611/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Benjamin Dougal Chatterton, Jan Herman Kuiper, Derfel Pari Williams
{"title":"Circumferential Periosteal Release to Treat Paediatric Leg Length Discrepancy: Medium Term Outcomes.","authors":"Benjamin Dougal Chatterton, Jan Herman Kuiper, Derfel Pari Williams","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1591","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to report the medium term outcomes of circumferential periosteal release of the distal femur and distal tibia in treating paediatric leg length discrepancy (LLD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective case series was performed on all patients undergoing circumferential periosteal release of the distal femur and/or tibia between 2006 and 2019. Data collected included demographics, surgical indications, post-operative leg lengths, and complications. Leg length discrepancy was calculated as actual values and percentages of the longest limb length. Final actual and percentage discrepancies were compared to initial discrepancies using a paired <i>t</i>-test. Patterns of discrepancy over time were analysed using linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients (11 males) were identified, who underwent 25 procedures. The mean age at first surgery was 5.8 (range, 2-13). The commonest indication was congenital limb deficiency (7 patients). Five patients underwent repeat periosteal release, and one patient had three releases. The mean follow-up was 63 months [standard deviation (SD), 33.9]. Fifteen patients had sufficient data for statistical analysis.The mean actual discrepancy decreased from 2.07 cm (SD, 1.07) to 1.12 cm (SD, 1.62), and the mean relative discrepancy from 4.3% (SD, 2.8) to 1.5% (SD, 2.4). Significant mean reductions were seen in both actual discrepancies [0.61 cm (95% CI: 0.05-1.16; <i>p</i> = 0.034)], and percentage discrepancy [2.10% (95% CI: 1.0-3.1, <i>p</i> = <0.001]). In five patients, the operated limb overgrew the contralateral limb. Patients whose operated limb overgrew still had a reduction in LLD, with a mean residual discrepancy less than 1 cm (mean 0.7 cm, 95% CI: From -0.9 to 2.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Circumferential periosteal release produces a significant decrease in both actual and percentage LLD. We believe this procedure is best indicated in younger patients with congenital LLD in whom the discrepancy is predicted to increase as they age.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Circumferential periosteal release produces a significant decrease in LLD. This procedure can be used to manage symptoms during growth, particularly at the point where orthotic usage may become problematic, and to potentially reduce the magnitude of surgery needed at an older age.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Chatterton BD, Kuiper JH, Williams DP. Circumferential Periosteal Release to Treat Paediatric Leg Length Discrepancy: Medium Term Outcomes. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):67-72.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628615/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial.","authors":"","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1593","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1593","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628612/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
D P Motta, Jlr Faria, A Couto, D P Aguiar, Mvg Amaral, L L Kropf, Gava Motta, F S Cerqueira, B D Leonetti
{"title":"Gradual Correction of Valgus Deformities of the Tibia Using a Monolateral External Fixator.","authors":"D P Motta, Jlr Faria, A Couto, D P Aguiar, Mvg Amaral, L L Kropf, Gava Motta, F S Cerqueira, B D Leonetti","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1585","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1585","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present a review of patients subjected to gradual correction of a valgus deformity of the tibia using a monolateral external fixator.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective review included patients from January 2012 to May 2022 who met the following inclusion criteria: deviation of mechanical axis of the limb due to valgus deformity of the tibia; tibial deformity in the coronal plane on radiographic examination; a documented outpatient pre-operative evaluation by an orthopaedic surgeon and age between 10 and 70 years. The following exclusion criteria were applied: the presence of another tibia deformity preventing gradual correction using the proposed assembly; skin conditions incompatible with the surgical procedure; inadequate pre- or post-operative radiological evaluation; and insufficient information in the medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients with a valgus deformity of the tibia was 30.8 ± 15.9 years. These patients had a body mass index (BMI) of 26.1 ± 5.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. A congenital or developmental aetiology was attributed to 58.3% of the cases. Most commonly, the deformity was found in the middle third of the tibia with a mean deformity of 14.7 ± 6.6 degrees. The total external fixator time ranged from 73 to 229 days (average 149.7 ± 36.1 days). The mean medial proximal and lateral distal tibial angles differed significantly for pre- and post-operative measurements (<i>p ≤</i> 0.05). There were complications in eight cases; five cases of pin site infections, two cases of medial cortical fracture and one case of peroneal nerve neuropraxia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed correction technique produces a satisfactory angular correction and with similar outcomes as described in the literature.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Motta DP, Faria JLR, Couto A, <i>et al</i>. Gradual Correction of Valgus Deformities of the Tibia Using a Monolateral External Fixator. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):123-132.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628620/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}