{"title":"Regime Shifting of IP Law Making and Enforcement from the WTO to the International Investment Regime","authors":"J. Gathii, Cynthia M. Ho","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2914650","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2914650","url":null,"abstract":"This article provides new insight to regime shifting and regime complexes through one of the first detailed analysis of the regime shift in intellectual property law making and enforcement from the World Trade Organization to international investment law. Unlike prior cases of regime shifting that have predominantly focused on the efforts of States and NGOs creating counter-norms viz-a-viz those of the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement, the current regime shift is primarily engineered by multinational corporations seeking to destabilize TRIPS flexibilities through investor-state arbitration. Since defending these cases costs countries millions of dollars, this regime shift to investor state arbitration has a significant chilling effect on the regulatory authority of states. We argue and show that by bringing or threatening to bring investor-state litigation to protect their IP rights against countries seeking to protect public health, pharmaceutical and tobacco companies pose a serious threat to the sovereignty of countries to implement the TRIPS Agreement in a manner that balances IP rights against values such as access to affordable medicine. As a consequence this Article argues that this regime shift is significant not only for developing countries, but for developed countries, such as Canada, Australia, and members of the European Union as well. The last part of the article proposes solutions to the challenges that this regime shifting raises. The first set of proposals recommend defining and clarifying key terms in investment treaties to minimize harm to domestic sovereignty as well as to maximize flexibilities under the TRIPS Agreement. The second set of proposals recommend improving the investment dispute process through a variety of reforms.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121593390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A New Look at Intellectual Property and Innovation in Africa","authors":"P. Terroir","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2822360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2822360","url":null,"abstract":"Africa is a large continent with 54 countries. A solid average growth rate of more than five per cent over the past 15 years, bears witness to the region’s impressive economic potential. A growing labour force and a large and emerging consumer market hold the promise of significant further growth opportunities. Yet a myriad of challenges need to be addressed in order to reap these potential gains. Africa has all the ingredients to make this happen, and decisions and actions taken today will determine whether Africa will succeed in achieving higher levels of prosperity. (The Africa Competitiveness Report 2015, WEF). This article examines innovation and intellectual property trends in Africa.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132680982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fake it, Till You Make It: A Justification for Intellectual Property 'Piracy'","authors":"L. J. Gibbons","doi":"10.18060/18388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18060/18388","url":null,"abstract":"Economic development in the least developed countries requires the use of or access to the more developed nation's intellectual property without always compensating rights holders. This Article uses a neo-classical economic argument to support this theory of a right of access as being a stepping stone on the road to economic development and posits that this so-called piracy could be better conceptualized as an economically efficient form of foreign aid.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134293787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Protecting Traditional Knowledge: Can Intellectual Property Rights Help?","authors":"P. K. Lakshmanan, S. Lakshmanan","doi":"10.14259/AS.V1I2.152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14259/AS.V1I2.152","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Traditional knowledge (TK) is the intellectual creativity of indigenous peoples and local communities developed over generations through close observations of nature and experimentation. In essence it is the knowledge, know-how, skills and practices that have been developed, sustained and passed on from generation to generation within a community, and the people in the community are so deeply and completely imbedded in that milieu that it is forming their cultural and/or spiritual identity. It is so completely encompassing the lives of the people that it can be found in a wide variety of contexts, including: agricultural, scientific, technical, ecological and medicinal knowledge as well as biodiversity-related knowledge. TK of indigenous civilizations provides enormous benefits for life-style management, preventive health care systems and state-of-the-art technology for humanity as a whole. Unfortunately, legal systems have not recognized TK and not given due respect for its direct and indirect contributions to the development of modern science and technology so far. This paper unfolds various dimensions in which TK is sought to be protected under the modern legal and economic systems. It probes into the possibilities of TK being protected under intellectual property rights or alternative mechanisms yet to be created. This paper also analyses the provisions of Convention on Biological Diversity, Nagoya Protocol and the exclusive involvement of World Intellectual Property Rights Organization (WIPO) to protect genetic resources, TK and traditional cultural expressions.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125373226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Contracting Over the Disclosure of Scientific Knowledge: Intellectual Property and Academic Publication","authors":"J. Gans, Fiona E. Murray, Scott Stern","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1559871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1559871","url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a theoretical investigation of the tension over knowledge disclosure between firms and their scientific employees. While empirical research suggests that scientists exhibit a “taste for science,” such open disclosures can limit a firm's competitive advantage or ability to profitably commercialize their innovations. To explore how this tension is resolved we focus on the strategic interaction between researchers and firms bargaining over whether (and how) knowledge will be disclosed. We evaluate four disclosure strategies: secrecy, patenting, open science (scientific publication) and patent-paper pairs providing insights into the determinants of the disclosure strategy of a firm. We find that patents and publications can be complementary instruments facilitating the disclosure of knowledge-providing predictions as to when stronger IP protection regimes might drive openness by firms.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121668681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Conflict-of-Laws Approach to Competing Rationalities in International Law: The Case of Plain Packaging between IP, Trade, Investment and Health","authors":"Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2204980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2204980","url":null,"abstract":"The idea of employing conflict-of-laws principles to address competing rationalities in international law is unorthodox, but not new. Research focuses on inter-systemic conflicts between different areas of international law – but has stopped short of proposing conflict rules. This article goes a step further and reviews the wealth of private international law approaches and how they can contribute to applying rules of another, ‘foreign’ system. Against the background global intellectual property rules and their interfaces with trade, investment, health and human rights, the dispute over plain packaging of tobacco products serves as test case for conflict-of-laws principles. It shows how these principles allow a forum to apply external rules – beyond interpretative concepts such as systemic integration.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129228276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Solving Virus Problems by Anti-Virus Developers - A TRIZ Perspective","authors":"U. Mishra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1978385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1978385","url":null,"abstract":"The anti-virus developers play a very significant role in dealing with the computer viruses. They analyze the problems of different levels of users and find solutions for each of those problems. Their goal is not just to sell the product and make profit out of it. They undertake much greater responsibility to ensure that their product meets the expectations of the users and deals with the viruses efficiently. Different levels of users dealing with computer face different types of problems. The developer must ensure that the product meets the needs of various levels of users and network administrators. The developer has to employ various strategies to overcome the limitations of signature scanning, heuristic scanning and other methods and ensure speed and efficiency of virus scanning without leading to any false positives or false negatives.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124342853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Influence of Intellectual Property Rights on the International Trade of Advanced Technology Products","authors":"Shawn Wilkinson","doi":"10.12778/235108618X15452373185075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12778/235108618X15452373185075","url":null,"abstract":"The gravity model of international trade is based on the assumption that trade between two countries will tend to be greater as barriers between those two economies become smaller. In the traditional application of the gravity model, the physical distance between two economies, a proxy for transportation costs, represents this barrier in a very physical sense. This paper utilizes the gravity model to evaluate trade flows among a specific subset of traded goods, that of advanced technology products. The overall production costs of ATP goods include expenditures from a substantial amount of research and development, which means that transportation costs tend to represent a smaller portion of the overall production costs. Therefore, in the context of the gravity model, for ATP, the “barrier” effect of transportation costs is hypothesized to be weaker than for overall trade flows. Additionally, due to large investments in research and development of advanced technology products, low levels of intellectual property protection may serve to discourage firms from trading with countries that have comparatively loose enforcement of intellectual property protection regulations. This paper compares the application of the gravity model to exports of ATP and overall exports from the United States. The gravity model is applied to both overall US exports and US exports of ATP for the years 2007 to 2011. The gravity model is further applied to 2011 US exports of 10 ATP subcategories. Through these two approaches, this paper assesses the varying influence of transportation costs and intellectual property protections on the trade on of advanced technology products. Results indicate that higher levels of intellectual property protections in an economy are associated with greater imports of ATP from the United States, and that responsiveness to fluctuations in levels of IPR enforcement is not uniform among all categories of ATP.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128191520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction to Intellectual Property","authors":"M. Das","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1908118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1908118","url":null,"abstract":"It is a known fact to us that the inventor of a machine, the author of a book, or the writer of music is the owner or, we can say that those individuals ‘own’ their work. Therefore, from this ownership, certain consequences flow. This is the reason why we cannot just copy or buy a copy of their works without consideration of their rights. Now, the question that arises is that why do Intellectual Property Rights Matter? The first reason is that it is both just and appropriate that the person putting in the work and effort into an intellectual creation has some benefit as a result of this endeavor. The second reason is that by giving protection to intellectual property many such endeavors are encouraged and industries based on such work can grow, as people see that such work brings financial return.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121884056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trips-Plus Agenda Through Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: Implications for India","authors":"S. Agarwal","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1868026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1868026","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the developed countries have launched many initiatives and measures to tighten the enforcement of intellectual property. The aim is to get developing countries to take on TRIPS-Plus obligations that go beyond the already high standards of the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement. This strategy includes pushing TRIPS-Plus enforcement agenda in the disguise of combating counterfeiting and piracy through a proposed agreement called Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). Although not participating in negotiations, developing countries like India will nevertheless find their domestic policy space reduced by ACTA as ACTA standards likely will be a requirement of future bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs). In this regard, developing countries have expressed concern over the move by a select group of developed countries to foist the agenda of the proposed ACTA on them by widening the scope of protection beyond the TRIPS agreement. This article attempts to figure out the implications of ACTA for India, in particular its impact on India’s generic medicine export.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132314601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}