发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

The Clamor of Lawyers最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
“The Worst Instrument of Arbitrary Power” “最糟糕的专断权力工具”
The Clamor of Lawyers Pub Date : 2018-10-15 DOI: 10.7591/CORNELL/9781501726071.003.0002
P. Hoffer, W. Hoffer
{"title":"“The Worst Instrument of Arbitrary Power”","authors":"P. Hoffer, W. Hoffer","doi":"10.7591/CORNELL/9781501726071.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/CORNELL/9781501726071.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"George Grenville’s program of “reform” was first and foremost a legal one—a thorough review of colonial law, the enforcement of old laws and the passage of new laws adapted from older models. It was thus natural and proper for revolutionary lawyers in the making to take the lead in protesting these laws, at least insofar as they seemed a break with precedent as well as sound policy. It was natural and proper as well for lawyers attached to the crown interest to defend Grenville’s policies, for surely Parliament, which Grenville led, was a legitimate source of new legislation. Thus the lawyers on both sides of the issue joined combat in the court of public opinion.","PeriodicalId":217492,"journal":{"name":"The Clamor of Lawyers","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124430993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chapter 2. “The Alienation of the Affection of the Colonies” 第二章。《殖民地情感的异化》
The Clamor of Lawyers Pub Date : 2018-10-15 DOI: 10.7591/CORNELL/9781501726071.003.0003
P. Hoffer, W. Hoffer
{"title":"Chapter 2. “The Alienation of the Affection of the Colonies”","authors":"P. Hoffer, W. Hoffer","doi":"10.7591/CORNELL/9781501726071.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/CORNELL/9781501726071.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"At whose door the onus for reigniting the crisis in 1767 belongs is and will remain an open question for historians. But it cannot be laid at the threshold of the revolutionary lawyers’ offices. Their conduct in the controversy thus far was wholly responsible and measured. Dulany wrote with judicial restraint. Otis, Dickinson, Bland, and Fitch were respectful. Only Hopkins blustered. All were careful not to defame their opponents in the colonies or the home country (not least because such defamation might lead to prosecution for seditious libel). In the main, they acknowledged their contributions to the debate by signing their essays. Reconciliation should have followed, could have followed, had not leaders across the water insisted on renewing Grenville’s legalist program.","PeriodicalId":217492,"journal":{"name":"The Clamor of Lawyers","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132381148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信