Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Frequency Vs. Length of Hot Spots Patrols: a Randomised Controlled Trial 热点巡逻的频率与时间:一项随机对照试验
Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing Pub Date : 2017-06-06 DOI: 10.17863/CAM.10256
Simon Williams, T. Coupe
{"title":"Frequency Vs. Length of Hot Spots Patrols: a Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Simon Williams, T. Coupe","doi":"10.17863/CAM.10256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.10256","url":null,"abstract":"Research QuestionDo shorter but more frequent patrol visits to the same crime hot spots reduce daily crime and anti-social behaviour (ASB) totals more effectively than less frequent but longer patrols, if the total time that police are present each day is held roughly constant?DataGPS measures from patrol officer body-worn radios tracked the time each officer spent within seven geo-fenced crime “hot spots” of 150 × 150 m, summing the number of both individual officer-minutes and patrol-minutes (with one or more officers present simultaneously) per day per hot spot, as well as number of visits and minutes per visit. Activity reports were used to detect the simultaneous presence of more than one officer, yielding the key independent variables of number and length of patrol visits in which one or more police officers were present. The dependent variable was total reports of crime and anti-social behaviour (ASB) identified within the hot spot boundaries each day of the experiment.MethodAll seven hot spots of crime and ASB were randomly allocated each day to one of two patrol duration conditions for a period of 100 days (43 “short” visit days and 57 “long” visit days) between June and November 2015, with patrol time measures reported back to officers on the number and length of patrols conducted daily. The long visit model required three visits daily of 15 min duration each; the short visit model required nine visits daily of 5 min each. On all days, a target of 45 min of total patrol time was required.ResultsActual patrol delivery measured by GPS and activity reports produced a mean of just over 24 patrol-minutes (of one or more officers present) on “long” days and just under 26 min on “short” days, so that dosage was approximately held constant to test the independent effect of more or fewer visits. The treatment as delivered on “long” days was a mean of 2.5 visits averaging 9.6 min each; on “short” days, the same officers delivered a mean of 5 visits averaging 5.2 min each. The less-frequent long visit model was more effective than the more-frequent short visit model, with mean counts of crime and ASB incidents 19.51% lower on long visit days =0.697 incidents per day compared to 0.561 incidents per day on short visit days (d = −0.175; p = 0.018).ConclusionControlling for the total patrol time spent at a hot spot each day, the difference between 2.5 longer visits and 5 shorter visits causes about 20% less crime when longer visits are delivered. These findings of the deterrent effect of increasing patrol visit length by 85% are consistent with Koper’s (1995) correlational observation that longer units of 10–15 min duration appeared optimal in creating a residual deterrent effect at a hot spot immediately after police leave the vicinity. Although this study cannot distinguish between crime reductions immediately after vs. long after police have left the scene, this is the first experiment to randomly assign a substantial difference (twice as many) in ","PeriodicalId":217468,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124518667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
The “Power Curve” of Victim Harm: Targeting the Distribution of Crime Harm Index Values Across All Victims and Repeat Victims over 1 Year 受害者伤害的“权力曲线”:针对所有受害者和重复受害者一年内犯罪伤害指数值的分布
Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing Pub Date : 2017-05-26 DOI: 10.1007/s41887-017-0001-3
Gavin Dudfield, C. Angel, L. Sherman, Sarah K. Torrence
{"title":"The “Power Curve” of Victim Harm: Targeting the Distribution of Crime Harm Index Values Across All Victims and Repeat Victims over 1 Year","authors":"Gavin Dudfield, C. Angel, L. Sherman, Sarah K. Torrence","doi":"10.1007/s41887-017-0001-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-017-0001-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":217468,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125196242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Frequency Vs. Length of Hot Spots Patrols: a Randomised Controlled Trial 热点巡逻的频率与时间:一项随机对照试验
Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing Pub Date : 2017-05-12 DOI: 10.1007/s41887-017-0003-1
Simon Williams, T. Coupe
{"title":"Frequency Vs. Length of Hot Spots Patrols: a Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Simon Williams, T. Coupe","doi":"10.1007/s41887-017-0003-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-017-0003-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":217468,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114626288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Frequency Versus Duration of Police Patrol Visits for Reducing Crime in Hot Spots: Non-Experimental Findings from the Sacramento Hot Spots Experiment 警察巡逻次数对减少热点地区犯罪的影响:萨克拉门托热点实验的非实验结果
Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing Pub Date : 2017-04-05 DOI: 10.1007/s41887-017-0002-2
Renée J. Mitchell
{"title":"Frequency Versus Duration of Police Patrol Visits for Reducing Crime in Hot Spots: Non-Experimental Findings from the Sacramento Hot Spots Experiment","authors":"Renée J. Mitchell","doi":"10.1007/s41887-017-0002-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-017-0002-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":217468,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114172377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Editorial Policies 编辑政策
Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s41887-017-0004-0
Lawrence W. Sherman
{"title":"Editorial Policies","authors":"Lawrence W. Sherman","doi":"10.1007/s41887-017-0004-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-017-0004-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":217468,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121707472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信