Landmark Cases in Succession Law最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Sugden v Lord St Leonards (1876): Probate of the Missing Will – Hamlet Without the Prince? 苏格登诉圣伦纳兹勋爵(1876):遗嘱缺失——没有王子的哈姆雷特?
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 2019-10-31 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-010
S. Cooper
{"title":"Sugden v Lord St Leonards (1876): Probate of the Missing Will – Hamlet Without the Prince?","authors":"S. Cooper","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128845438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Banks v Goodfellow (1870): Defining Testamentary Capacity 银行诉古德费罗(1870):界定遗嘱行为能力
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 2019-10-17 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-004
Juliet Brook
{"title":"Banks v Goodfellow (1870): Defining Testamentary Capacity","authors":"Juliet Brook","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126477099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Williams v Williams (1882): Succession Law Rules and the Fate of the Dead 威廉姆斯诉威廉姆斯案(1882):继承法规则和死者的命运
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-014
Heather Conway
{"title":"Williams v Williams (1882): Succession Law Rules and the Fate of the Dead","authors":"Heather Conway","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115666267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Williams v Hensman (1861) and the Law of Severance: Janus Personified 威廉姆斯诉亨斯曼(1861)和遣散法:杰纳斯人格化
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-008
M. Dixon
{"title":"Williams v Hensman (1861) and the Law of Severance: Janus Personified","authors":"M. Dixon","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-008","url":null,"abstract":"An examination of the law of severance of joint-tenancies through the medium of Williams v Hensman. A critique of severance in the modern law.","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121463535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
White v Jones (1995): A Legacy of the Search for Principle 怀特诉琼斯案(1995):寻求原则的遗产
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 2019-03-03 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-007
Judith Skillen, J. Lee
{"title":"White v Jones (1995): A Legacy of the Search for Principle","authors":"Judith Skillen, J. Lee","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134313820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Birmingham v Renfrew (1937): The Foundations of the Mutual Wills Doctrine 伯明翰诉伦弗鲁(1937):共同遗嘱学说的基础
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 2018-11-14 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-009
Y. Liew
{"title":"Birmingham v Renfrew (1937): The Foundations of the Mutual Wills Doctrine","authors":"Y. Liew","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-009","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the facts of Birmingham v. Renfrew and the impact of the decision on the development of the mutual wills doctrine in Anglo-Australian law. Much like laying the secure foundations of a building, Birmingham has supplied three central ‘pillars’ upon which the doctrine has gradually been built upon, and upon which the future development of the doctrine can securely be based. The three ‘pillars’ are: the interaction between ‘contract’ and equity, the meaning of ‘contract’, and the rationale of the mutual wills doctrine.","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132189569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re D(J) (1981): Statutory Wills Re D(J)(1981):法定遗嘱
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-005
B. Rich
{"title":"Re D(J) (1981): Statutory Wills","authors":"B. Rich","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"16 17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115704619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Jesson v Wright (1820): Wills, Coal and the Rule in Shelley’s Case 杰森诉赖特(1820):遗嘱,煤和规则在雪莱的情况
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-003
N. Jones
{"title":"Jesson v Wright (1820): Wills, Coal and the Rule in Shelley’s Case","authors":"N. Jones","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133680029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strong v Bird (1874): Reassessing the Rule Strong v Bird(1874):重新评估规则
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-013
Elizabeth A. Drummond
{"title":"Strong v Bird (1874): Reassessing the Rule","authors":"Elizabeth A. Drummond","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127852995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re Welch (1990): Enforcing Testamentary Promises Re Welch(1990):强制执行遗嘱承诺
Landmark Cases in Succession Law Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509919031.ch-012
N. Peart
{"title":"Re Welch (1990): Enforcing Testamentary Promises","authors":"N. Peart","doi":"10.5040/9781509919031.ch-012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509919031.ch-012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":215486,"journal":{"name":"Landmark Cases in Succession Law","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134389067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信