CGN: Endowments & Foundations as Investors (Sub-Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Values and Value: University Endowments, Fiduciary Duties, and ESG Investing 价值与价值:大学捐赠、受托责任和ESG投资
CGN: Endowments & Foundations as Investors (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2016-02-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2656640
Susan N. Gary
{"title":"Values and Value: University Endowments, Fiduciary Duties, and ESG Investing","authors":"Susan N. Gary","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2656640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2656640","url":null,"abstract":"The trustees managing university endowment funds must comply with fiduciary duties that require the trustees to act in the best interests of the university and to act as prudent investors when managing the funds. This article shows that these fiduciaries may adopt investment policies that consider material environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors as part of an overall investment strategy. The article explains why older arguments that fiduciaries should avoid “social investing” are no longer relevant and how the prudent investor standard has evolved to include ESG investing. The article discusses the changes in socially responsible investing since the anti-apartheid era and reviews a significant number of empirical studies that show that ESG investing has had a neutral or positive effect on financial return. Based on the empirical work, evidence of the financial industry’s growing use of extra-financial factors in investment analysis, and recent guidance from the Department of Labor, the article concludes that a trustee responsible for a university endowment will not breach the duty of loyalty or the duty to act as a prudent investor by directing the endowment’s use of ESG investing as part of an overall financial investment strategy..","PeriodicalId":208593,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Endowments & Foundations as Investors (Sub-Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116959626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Audit Reports of Public State-owned Foundations: Determining Factors in Audit Opinions (El Informe de Auditoria de las Fundaciones Publicas Estatales: Factores Determinantes del Tipo de Opinion) 公共所有基金会审计报告:审计意见中的决定因素(审计报告:意见类型的决定因素)
CGN: Endowments & Foundations as Investors (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2012-11-02 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2170473
B. González‐Díaz, Roberto García Fernandez, Antonio Lopez Diaz
{"title":"Audit Reports of Public State-owned Foundations: Determining Factors in Audit Opinions (El Informe de Auditoria de las Fundaciones Publicas Estatales: Factores Determinantes del Tipo de Opinion)","authors":"B. González‐Díaz, Roberto García Fernandez, Antonio Lopez Diaz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2170473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2170473","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to determine the relationship between the opinion given in audit reports of public state-owned foundations and a set of characteristics pertaining to these foundations. Establishing such a relationship should help to improve foundation management and control. To this end a theoretical framework has been built, within which the expected effects of the different audit opinion variables are presented – foundation size, type of auditor, tax-year surplus, previous year’s opinion and which government department the foundation belongs to. Then, in order to develop the study, different logistic regression models have been calculated using a sample of 256 foundations audited over the period 2002 to 2008. The results highlight the fact that the opinion given in the previous year’s audit reports of public state-owned foundations is the main factor in determining the kind of opinion given in the current year. Other opinion-influencing factors are the government department link, foundation size and type of auditor.","PeriodicalId":208593,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Endowments & Foundations as Investors (Sub-Topic)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115048640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信