Audit Reports of Public State-owned Foundations: Determining Factors in Audit Opinions (El Informe de Auditoria de las Fundaciones Publicas Estatales: Factores Determinantes del Tipo de Opinion)

B. González‐Díaz, Roberto García Fernandez, Antonio Lopez Diaz
{"title":"Audit Reports of Public State-owned Foundations: Determining Factors in Audit Opinions (El Informe de Auditoria de las Fundaciones Publicas Estatales: Factores Determinantes del Tipo de Opinion)","authors":"B. González‐Díaz, Roberto García Fernandez, Antonio Lopez Diaz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2170473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to determine the relationship between the opinion given in audit reports of public state-owned foundations and a set of characteristics pertaining to these foundations. Establishing such a relationship should help to improve foundation management and control. To this end a theoretical framework has been built, within which the expected effects of the different audit opinion variables are presented – foundation size, type of auditor, tax-year surplus, previous year’s opinion and which government department the foundation belongs to. Then, in order to develop the study, different logistic regression models have been calculated using a sample of 256 foundations audited over the period 2002 to 2008. The results highlight the fact that the opinion given in the previous year’s audit reports of public state-owned foundations is the main factor in determining the kind of opinion given in the current year. Other opinion-influencing factors are the government department link, foundation size and type of auditor.","PeriodicalId":208593,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Endowments & Foundations as Investors (Sub-Topic)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Endowments & Foundations as Investors (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2170473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine the relationship between the opinion given in audit reports of public state-owned foundations and a set of characteristics pertaining to these foundations. Establishing such a relationship should help to improve foundation management and control. To this end a theoretical framework has been built, within which the expected effects of the different audit opinion variables are presented – foundation size, type of auditor, tax-year surplus, previous year’s opinion and which government department the foundation belongs to. Then, in order to develop the study, different logistic regression models have been calculated using a sample of 256 foundations audited over the period 2002 to 2008. The results highlight the fact that the opinion given in the previous year’s audit reports of public state-owned foundations is the main factor in determining the kind of opinion given in the current year. Other opinion-influencing factors are the government department link, foundation size and type of auditor.
公共所有基金会审计报告:审计意见中的决定因素(审计报告:意见类型的决定因素)
本文的目的是确定国有上市基金会审计报告中的审计意见与这些基金会的一系列特征之间的关系。建立这样的关系有助于改善基金会的管理和控制。为此,本文构建了一个理论框架,并在该框架内给出了不同审计意见变量(基金会规模、审计人员类型、纳税年度盈余、上一年度审计意见和基金会所属政府部门)的预期效果。然后,为了开展研究,使用2002年至2008年期间审计的256个基金会的样本计算了不同的逻辑回归模型。结果表明,上年度国有公募基金会审计报告出具的审计意见是决定本年度审计意见类型的主要因素。其他影响意见的因素有政府部门联系、基础规模和审计人员类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信