Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England最新文献_第2页

Parliament and the principle of elective succession in Elizabethan England 伊丽莎白时代英格兰的议会和选举继承原则

Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England Pub Date : 2018-07-14 DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719099588.003.0005

P. Kewes

{"title":"Parliament and the principle of elective succession in Elizabethan England","authors":"P. Kewes","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9780719099588.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719099588.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"The question of precisely how far parliament should be involved in settling the succession to the crown constitutes a neglected strand of the Elizabethan succession debate. Patrick Collinson and his successors have examined in detail the attempts undertaken by committed Protestants from the 1560s through to the 1580s to secure legislation debarring Mary, queen of Scots. However, this chapter demonstrates that a necessary corollary of the campaign for exclusion was the argument that parliament, even one summoned after Elizabeth’s death without statutory warrant, could determine the identity of her rightful successor or even choose the next ruler. Theoretical justifications of this scenario, however, were seldom disinterested, and were typically designed with a practical purpose and a specific person in mind. It may be a mistake to treat them as expressions of abstract political thought. Drawing on new archival evidence, this chapter reveals that he intended beneficiary of the boldest such scheme propounded in 1586, when the Scottish queen was still alive, was her infant son James. It concludes by reflecting on the memory and polemical uses of Elizabethan parliaments in late Stuart England.","PeriodicalId":207891,"journal":{"name":"Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England","volume":"529 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132381636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Elizabethan chroniclers and parliament 伊丽莎白时代的编年史和议会

Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England Pub Date : 2018-07-14 DOI: 10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719099588.003.0006

I. Archer

{"title":"Elizabethan chroniclers and parliament","authors":"I. Archer","doi":"10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719099588.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719099588.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"Chronicles remained the dominant form of historical writing throughout the sixteenth century, and contained much material about the relationship of parliament and the crown and the wider political community. But how coherent a view of parliament could be derived from the chronicles? That is the question addressed by this essay, primarily through Holinshed, but with reference to the other chronicles on which his account was built. Holinshed included some key texts on parliament, including William Harrison’s reworking of Sir Thomas Smith’s account in De republica Anglorum (1583), significantly enhancing parliament’s role on the succession and church reform, and John Hooker’s Order and Usage (1572), inserted into the Irish section. But Holinshed famously left his chronicles open to variant readings. There was little interest in parliament’s institutional development, or commonwealth legislation, but much more interest in parliament as the bringer of hated taxes, and in the politics of parliaments, particularly relating to monarchical succession. It is argued that readers might take away various understandings from the chronicles, but that in any case the chronicles tended to focus less on institutional structures than on the moral qualities of the country’s leaders who operated them.","PeriodicalId":207891,"journal":{"name":"Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129279820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

‘That memorable parliament’ “令人难忘的议会”

Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England Pub Date : 2018-07-14 DOI: 10.7765/9781526115904.00015

J. Peacey

引用次数: 0

Polydore Vergil and the first English parliament 波利多·维吉尔和第一届英国议会

Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England Pub Date : 2018-07-14 DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719099588.003.0002

P. Cavill

引用次数: 0

Dedication 奉献

Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England Pub Date : 2018-07-14 DOI: 10.7765/9781526115904.00002

引用次数: 0

Institutional memory and contemporary history in the House of Commons, 1547–1640 1547-1640年英国下议院的制度记忆和近代史

Writing the history of parliament in Tudor and early Stuart England Pub Date : 2018-07-14 DOI: 10.7765/9781526115904.00016

P. Seaward

引用次数: 1