Parliamentary Affairs最新文献_第9页

Do Anti-Elitist Parties Use Their Parliamentary Tools Differently? 反精英政党使用议会工具的方式不同吗?

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-04-12 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB027

S. Otjes, Tom Louwerse

{"title":"Do Anti-Elitist Parties Use Their Parliamentary Tools Differently?","authors":"S. Otjes, Tom Louwerse","doi":"10.1093/PA/GSAB027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/PA/GSAB027","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Populist parties have become an important factor in opposition politics all over Europe. While we know a lot about the behaviour of populist parties in the electoral arena and even in the governmental arena, we know surprisingly little about their behaviour in parliament. This article studies the behaviour of populist opposition parties in parliament. We hypothesise that it is the anti-elitism of populism that is the ‘active’ element that shapes their parliamentary behaviour. Anti-elitist parties are more likely to be ‘responsive’ parties, using parliament as a bully pulpit to amplify citizens’ objections to policy and less likely to be ‘responsible’ parties, using the legislature as a place to find support for policy alternatives. We hypothesise anti-elitist parties to use parliamentary scrutiny tools more often than other parties. We make use of recently collected cross-national data on parliamentary behaviour in seven European democracies to test this hypothesis. Our results indicate that parties that have been characterised as anti-elitist tend to vote more against legislation, but they do not ask more parliamentary questions.","PeriodicalId":19790,"journal":{"name":"Parliamentary Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/PA/GSAB027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44258265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Parliamentary Representation in Six European Right-Wing Sovereignist Parties: Resemblance or Innovation? 欧洲六个右翼主权主义政党的议会代表制:相似还是创新?

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-04-02 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB026

R. Borri, Luca Verzichelli

引用次数: 2

New Challenger Parties in Opposition: Isolation or Cooperation? 反对党的新挑战者：孤立还是合作？

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-30 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB025

Elisabetta De Giorgi, António Dias, Branislav Dolný

引用次数: 2

Long Hours, Uneasy Feelings: Parliamentary Work in Denmark, Finland and Sweden 工作时间长，情绪不安:丹麦、芬兰和瑞典的议会工作

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-29 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB022

Mona Mannevuo, Jenni M Rinne, Isak Vento

引用次数: 5

Vandenberg Vanished: US Congress and the Politicisation of Military Interventions 范登堡消失:美国国会和军事干预的政治化

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-29 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB023

Florian Böller

引用次数: 5

Party Whips and Expertise: Explaining Committee Switching in the Scottish Parliament 党鞭和专业知识：苏格兰议会委员会换届的解释

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-29 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAA066

Jeremy Cairney, Sergiu Gherghina

引用次数: 0

Exploring Responses to the Collapse of Devolution in Northern Ireland 2017–2020 through the Lens of Multi-Level Governance 从多层次治理的视角探讨2017-2020年北爱尔兰权力下放崩溃的对策

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-19 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB013

D. Heenan, D. Birrell

引用次数: 3

Confrontational but Respecting the Rules: The Minor Impact of the Finns Party on Legislative–Executive Relations 对抗但尊重规则:芬兰政党对立法-行政关系的次要影响

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-12 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB010

Corentin Poyet, Tapio Raunio

引用次数: 2

Do Coalition Governments with Populist Parties Attempt to Rationalise Law-Making in Parliaments? Evidence from the Czech Chamber of Deputies 民粹主义政党联合政府是否试图使议会立法合理化?来自捷克众议院的证据

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-12 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB011

Robert Zbíral

{"title":"Do Coalition Governments with Populist Parties Attempt to Rationalise Law-Making in Parliaments? Evidence from the Czech Chamber of Deputies","authors":"Robert Zbíral","doi":"10.1093/PA/GSAB011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/PA/GSAB011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Populism might be a threat to parliamentary democracy but does not automatically signal its demise. First, not all populist parties seek illiberal goals. Second, in Europe most populist parties entering governments have done so as coalitions with mainstream parties. Yet, almost all populists, including the non-extremist and ‘integrated’ ones, call for more efficient governance. We assume that once in the executive, that objective will also manifest itself in the rationalisation of law-making in legislatures. By applying a more assertive strategy and exploiting existing rules, cabinets will attempt to streamline their legislative agendas. We test this theoretical framework on empirical evidence from the Czech Chamber of Deputies, which can serve as prototypical case. Since 2010, three coalition governments have ruled. In the last two, the influence of populist parties (represented by ANO under the leadership of Andrej Babiš) gradually increased. By tracking the legislative performance of cabinets in the Chamber, we found that executives with a populist presence actually fared worse than their non-populist predecessor (baseline) in almost all proceedings and outcomes of law-making. The bills submitted by the last government, where ANO dominated, even suffered the most. Contrary to our assumption, a strategy of rationalisation has therefore not succeeded. The findings open interesting questions about how effective cabinets with populists are in law-making in parliaments, and about the future of legislatures as resilient safeguards against the populist challenge.","PeriodicalId":19790,"journal":{"name":"Parliamentary Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/PA/GSAB011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47500468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Positive Side Effects? The Impact of Populist Radical Right Parties in Government on the Media Visibility of the Austrian Parliament 积极的副作用？政府中民粹主义激进右翼政党对奥地利议会媒体知名度的影响

IF 1.2 3区社会学

Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-12 DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSAB012

E. Miklin, M. Dolezal

引用次数: 0