{"title":"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: concomitant diseases with an emphasis on epilepsy","authors":"O. Pylaeva, A. A. Shatenshteĭn, K. Mukhin","doi":"10.17650/2073-8803-2018-13-3-57-74","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2073-8803-2018-13-3-57-74","url":null,"abstract":"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common cause of behavioral disorders and learning difficulties in preschool and school-age children. Patients with ADHD are often diagnosed with concomitant diseases, which creates additional diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and leads to a more significant reduction in the quality of life. ADHD is often associated with epilepsy: ADHD manifestations are more common in individuals with epilepsy, and vice versa, patients with ADHD are more likely to have epilepsy. The estimated prevalence of ADHD in children is 7–9 %, whereas in children with epilepsy, it reaches 20–50 %. Epilepsy is also one of the most common diseases in children (affecting approximately 1 % of the pediatric population), which is often aggravated by concomitant diseases, including cognitive, behavioral and emotional disorders. Various factors, such as characteristics of epileptic process and lesions in particular portions of the brain, can underlie the development of ADHD in epilepsy. Epileptiform activity and adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs can also play an important etiological role. Some antiepileptic drugs (such as barbiturates) may cause symptoms similar to those in ADHD (in this case, inattentiveness and hyperactivity shall be considered as adverse events that can be reduced or eliminated after cessation of the drug) or exacerbate ADHD symptoms in patients with these disorders. Therefore, the drugs with no negative impact on concomitant diseases or with a positive therapeutic effect for both diseases are preferable in these cases.High prevalence of the ADHD/epilepsy combination leads to a greater reduction in the quality of life, suggesting high relevance of this problem and requiring a revision of therapeutic approaches.","PeriodicalId":196950,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126497152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K. Mukhin, O. Pylaeva, M. Bobylova, N. V. Freydkova, L. Y. Glukhova, M. O. Abramov
{"title":"Efficacy and tolerability of rufinamide in the treatment of epilepsy (experience of the Svt. Luka’s Institute of Child Neurology and Epilepsy)","authors":"K. Mukhin, O. Pylaeva, M. Bobylova, N. V. Freydkova, L. Y. Glukhova, M. O. Abramov","doi":"10.17650/2073-8803-2018-13-2-7-19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2073-8803-2018-13-2-7-19","url":null,"abstract":"Background. Despite significant advances in epileptology, approximately one-third of epilepsy patients suffer from drug-resistant seizures. Numerous approaches are currently available to treat epilepsy; however, there are still many patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy, in whom surgical treatment is impossible and alternative methods (vagus nerve stimulation and ketogenic diet) are ineffective. Therefore, searching for novel effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is crucial for these patients.Objective: analysis of own data on the efficacy and tolerability of rufinamide in patients with severe forms of epilepsy and seizures typical of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS).Materials and methods. The study included 31 patients aged between 4 and 26 years (mean age 7.5 years) that received rufinamide (inovelon). The study cohort comprised 21 males and 10 females. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with LGS, whereas 16 patients were diagnosed with structural focal epilepsy with a phenocopy of LGS. Five patients had an evolution of West syndrome to LGS. The majority of patients (n = 22) experienced predominantly axial tonic seizures and epileptic spasms that were considered as indications for introduction of rufinamide. All patients underwent electroencephalography, video-electroencephalography monitoring during wakefulness and sleep, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (including high-resolution MRI with special epilepsy protocols when indicated), genetic examination (tandem mass spectrometry, hereditary epilepsy gene panel test and chromosomal microarray analysis) when indicated, and laboratory tests to assess tolerability of antiepileptic drugs.Results. Good therapeutic effect (more than 50 % reduction in seizure frequency) was achieved in 14 (45.2 %) patients. A less than 50 % reduction in seizure frequency occurred in 5 (16.1 %) patients; in 2 of them seizures became shorter and milder without a significant reduction in their frequency. Rufinamide was ineffective in 9 (29 %) patients. Three (9.7 %) patients experienced aggravation (increased seizure frequency) after the introduction of rufinamide. Thus, treatment with rufinamide was effective in 19 (61.3 %) patients. Rufinamide was well tolerated by most of the patients. Side effects were observed in 6 (19 %) participants. Side effects (forced normalization) caused withdrawal of rufinamide in 1 (3.2 %) patient. Currently, 10 (32 %) patients continue to take rufinamide. Sixteen patients received rufinamide for <6 months, 17 patients – for >6 months, 5 patients – for >12 months, and 1 patient – for >2 years.Conclusion. Our findings are consistent with the results obtained by foreign authors in routine clinical practice. In our study, rufinamide was used only in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy that earlier received many of currently available AEDs (both in monotherapy and in combination with other drugs). All study participants were earlier treated with at least three different AEDs that were ineffectiv","PeriodicalId":196950,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134599338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}