发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
To What Extent Does the Privatisation of UK Detention Centres Cause the Erosion of the Article 3 ECHR Rights of Female Migrant Detainees and the Accountability of the State in Relation to This? 英国拘留中心的私有化在多大程度上侵蚀了《欧洲人权公约》第3条规定的女性移民被拘留者的权利，以及国家在这方面的责任?
Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability? Pub Date : 2021-07-29 DOI: 10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a007
R. Chapman
{"title":"To What Extent Does the Privatisation of UK Detention Centres Cause the Erosion of the Article 3 ECHR Rights of Female Migrant Detainees and the Accountability of the State in Relation to This?","authors":"R. Chapman","doi":"10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a007","url":null,"abstract":"Article 3 is the absolute right to be free from subjection to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment. This chapter argues that privatisation has caused the erosion of the Article 3 rights of female migrant detainees because the system is less transparent and so the state is not properly held to account. This is particularly evident in the case law that has found the state to be in breach of Article 3 due to the inhuman and degrading treatment of detainees in relation to neglect for their vulnerable mental health by the Home Office. Furthermore, the erosion of Article 3 rights as a result of privatisation is also clear in the allegations of sexual violence that have been levelled at the private employees of UK detention centres by various female migrant detainees.","PeriodicalId":192544,"journal":{"name":"Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123190855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In Whose Best Interests? The UK’s Implementation of Child Rights for Unaccompanied Minors Amidst Competing Legal, Economic, Social and Humanitarian Considerations 谁的利益最大?英国在法律、经济、社会和人道主义等方面对无人陪伴未成年人儿童权利的落实
Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability? Pub Date : 2021-07-29 DOI: 10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a009
K. Lee
{"title":"In Whose Best Interests? The UK’s Implementation of Child Rights for Unaccompanied Minors Amidst Competing Legal, Economic, Social and Humanitarian Considerations","authors":"K. Lee","doi":"10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a009","url":null,"abstract":"Article 3 of the UNCRC requires member states to observe the ‘best interests of the child as a primary consideration in all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies’. This chapter assesses how the UK’s immigration policy and practice discharges its obligations under the CRC with regard to its dealings with unaccompanied minor asylum seekers and refugees. After historically contextualising the interplay between international and national child rights legislation, this chapter explores the challenges arising from the Home Offices decision to outsource parts of the immigration service to the private sectors specifically around age determination, thus adding economic imperatives to polarised politically emotive migration discourse. It concludes that despite clear guidance from the British Courts to prioritise the best interest of the child; in reality, it is difficult to hold the State accountable for its implementation.","PeriodicalId":192544,"journal":{"name":"Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130005401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信