National health statistics reports最新文献

{"title":"Diagnosed Dementia in Adults Age 65 and Older:United States, 2022.","authors":"Ellen A Kramarow","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-This report presents estimates of diagnosed dementia in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population age 65 and older by selected sociodemographic characteristics. Methods-Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate the percentage of noninstitutionalized older adults with a dementia diagnosis. Information was self-reported unless a knowledgeable proxy responded to questions when the respondent was physically or mentally unable to answer. Prevalence of diagnosed dementia among older adults is presented by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, veteran status, education, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, urbanization, and region. Estimates of dementia reporting by proxy respondent status and interview mode also are presented. Results-In 2022, 4.0% of adults age 65 and older reported ever having received a dementia diagnosis. The percentage of adults with a dementia diagnosis was similar for men (3.8%) and women (4.2%). The percentage of adults with a dementia diagnosis increased with age, from 1.7% in those ages 65-74 to 13.1% in those age 85 and older, and decreased with rising education level, from 7.9% in adults age 65 and older with less than a high school diploma to 2.2% in those with a college degree or higher. Overall levels of older adults with a dementia diagnosis did not vary significantly by mode of interview (telephone or in person).</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 203","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Infertility and Impaired Fecundity in Women and Men in the United States, 2015-2019.","authors":"Colleen N Nugent, Anjani Chandra","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-Using National Survey of Family Growth data from 2015-2019, this report presents updated national estimates of infertility in U.S. women and men and estimates of impaired fecundity (physical ability to have children) in U.S. women. Detailed demographic breakdowns are also presented, and overall estimates for 2015-2019 are compared with those for 2011-2015. Methods-Data for this report come primarily from the 2015-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, which consisted of 21,441 interviews with men and women ages 15-49, conducted from September 2015 through September 2019. The response rate was 65.9% for women and 62.4% for men. Results-The percentage of women ages 15-44 who had impaired fecundity did not change between 2011-2015 and 2015-2019. The percentage of married women with impaired fecundity also remained stable over this time period. Among all women, 13.4% of women ages 15-49 and 15.4% of women ages 25-49 had impaired fecundity in 2015-2019. The percentage of married women ages 15-44 who were infertile rose from 2011-2015 (6.7%) to 2015-2019 (8.7%). Among married and cohabiting women ages 15-49 in 2015-2019, 7.8% had infertility. Both infertility and impaired fecundity were associated with age for nulliparous (never had a live birth) women after adjusting for other factors. Some form of infertility (either subfertility or nonsurgical sterility) was seen in 11.4% of men ages 15-49 and 12.8% of men ages 25-49 in 2015-2019. . Conclusion-Although these findings are not nationally representative, this report illustrates how linked NHCS-HUD data may provide insight into maternal health outcomes of patients who received housing assistance compared with those who did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 202","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140896175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"National Hospital Care Survey Demonstration Projects: Examination of Maternal Health Outcomes by Housing Assistance Status.","authors":"Josephine M Alford, Lello Guluma, Doreen M Gidali, Geoffrey Jackson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-Objective-This report demonstrates the use of linked National Hospital Care Survey (NHCS) and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administrative data to examine demographic characteristics and maternal health outcomes among both patients who received and did not receive housing assistance. Methods-Administrative claims data and electronic health records data from the 2016 NHCS were linked to 2015-2017 HUD administrative data using patient identifiers. HUD administrative data for Housing Choice Voucher, Public Housing, and Multifamily housing program participation were used to identify patients who received housing assistance before, during, or after their delivery hospitalization. Exploratory analyses were conducted for patients who had a delivery hospitalization in 2016 and were eligible for linkage to HUD administrative data. Demographic characteristics and maternal health outcomes were compared by housing assistance status. The linked NHCS-HUD data are unweighted and not nationally representative. Results-In the 2016 NHCS, 146,672 patients had a delivery hospitalization and were eligible for linkage to 2015-2017 HUD administrative data (95.6% had a live birth, 1.0% had a stillbirth, and 3.4% were unspecified). Among this study population, 9,559 patients (6.5%) received housing assistance from 2015 to 2017. Among those who received housing assistance, 66.5% visited large metropolitan hospitals, 71.8% were insured by Medicaid, and 3.0% experienced severe maternal morbidity. Among patients who did not receive housing assistance, 74.0% visited large metropolitan hospitals, 35.6% were insured by Medicaid, and 1.9% experienced severe maternal morbidity. Nearly two-thirds of patients who received housing assistance from 2015 to 2017 were receiving housing assistance at the time of their delivery hospitalization (63.6%). Conclusion-Although these findings are not nationally representative, this report illustrates how linked NHCS-HUD data may provide insight into maternal health outcomes of patients who received housing assistance compared with those who did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 201","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"National Hospital Care Survey Demonstration Projects: Examination of Maternal Health Outcomes by Housing Assistance Status.","authors":"Josephine Alford, Lello Guluma, Doreen Gidali, Geoffrey Jackson","doi":"10.15620/cdc:147100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:147100","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives-Objective-This report demonstrates the use of linked National Hospital Care Survey (NHCS) and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administrative data to examine demographic characteristics and maternal health outcomes among both patients who received and did not receive housing assistance. Methods-Administrative claims data and electronic health records data from the 2016 NHCS were linked to 2015-2017 HUD administrative data using patient identifiers. HUD administrative data for Housing Choice Voucher, Public Housing, and Multifamily housing program participation were used to identify patients who received housing assistance before, during, or after their delivery hospitalization. Exploratory analyses were conducted for patients who had a delivery hospitalization in 2016 and were eligible for linkage to HUD administrative data. Demographic characteristics and maternal health outcomes were compared by housing assistance status. The linked NHCS-HUD data are unweighted and not nationally representative. Results-In the 2016 NHCS, 146,672 patients had a delivery hospitalization and were eligible for linkage to 2015-2017 HUD administrative data (95.6% had a live birth, 1.0% had a stillbirth, and 3.4% were unspecified). Among this study population, 9,559 patients (6.5%) received housing assistance from 2015 to 2017. Among those who received housing assistance, 66.5% visited large metropolitan hospitals, 71.8% were insured by Medicaid, and 3.0% experienced severe maternal morbidity. Among patients who did not receive housing assistance, 74.0% visited large metropolitan hospitals, 35.6% were insured by Medicaid, and 1.9% experienced severe maternal morbidity. Nearly two-thirds of patients who received housing assistance from 2015 to 2017 were receiving housing assistance at the time of their delivery hospitalization (63.6%). Conclusion-Although these findings are not nationally representative, this report illustrates how linked NHCS-HUD data may provide insight into maternal health outcomes of patients who received housing assistance compared with those who did not.","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":"331 6","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140402273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Living Alone and Feelings of Depression Among Adults Age 18 and Older.","authors":"Laryssa Mykyta","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-This report presents national estimates of self-reported feelings of depression among adults by whether they lived alone or with others. Methods-Data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey were used to describe differences in self-reported feelings of depression and living arrangement by selected sociodemographic characteristics and social and emotional support among adults age 18 and older. The measure of living arrangement was categorized as living alone or living with others. Results-Overall, 16.0% of adults lived alone in 2021. Reported feelings of depression were higher among adults living alone (6.4%) compared with adults living with others (4.1%), for both men and women, across most race and Hispanic-origin groups, and by family income. Adults who reported never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living alone were almost twice as likely to report feelings of depression than those never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living with others (19.6% compared with 11.6%, respectively). Yet no significant difference was seen in reported feelings of depression among those who reported sometimes, usually, or always receiving social and emotional support by whether they were living alone or living with others. Conclusion-Adults living alone had higher reported feelings of depression than adults living with others. Differences in feelings of depression by living arrangement were observed for most of the characteristics examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 199","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139972736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Infection Control Policies and Practices in Residential Care Communities by Selected Organizational and Geographic Characteristics: United States, 2020.","authors":"Amanuel Melekin, Manisha Sengupta","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-Emergency operations plans that are specific to or include response to pandemics, approaches to implement the plans, and related infection control policies and practices vary among residential care communities (RCCs). This report presents nationally representative percentages of RCCs with infection control programs by selected characteristics. Methods-Data are from the RCC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, conducted biennially by the National Center for Health Statistics. The study asked four binary questions, including whether the RCC had a written Emergency Operations Plan that was specific to or included pandemic response, had a designated staff member or consultant responsible for coordinating the infection control program, offered annual influenza vaccination to residents, and offered annual influenza vaccination to all employees or contract staff. RCC characteristics presented in this report are bed size, chain affiliation, ownership status, and provision of dementia-specific care (RCCs that only served residents with dementia or had a dementia wing). Metropolitan statistical area (MSA) was used to characterize geographic location. Results-Most RCCs reported having a written Emergency Operations Plan that was specific to or included pandemic response. A higher percentage of RCCs with more than 26 beds and those with a designated space for dementia care reported having a written Emergency Operations Plan and a designated staff to coordinate an infection control program. The largest differences were observed in the provision of annual influenza vaccination to residents and to all employees or contract staff by MSA status, bed size, and presence of a designated space for dementia care. A higher percentage of RCCs in non-MSAs (83.4%), RCCs with a designated space for dementia care (95.0%), those with more than 50 beds (93.9%), those with 26-50 beds (93.3%), and those with nonprofit ownership (85.8%) offered annual influenza vaccination to all employees or contract staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 200","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139972737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Living Alone and Feelings of Depression Among Adults Age 18 and Older.","authors":"Laryssa Mykyta","doi":"10.15620/cdc:136451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:136451","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives-This report presents national estimates of self-reported feelings of depression among adults by whether they lived alone or with others. Methods-Data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey were used to describe differences in self-reported feelings of depression and living arrangement by selected sociodemographic characteristics and social and emotional support among adults age 18 and older. The measure of living arrangement was categorized as living alone or living with others. Results-Overall, 16.0% of adults lived alone in 2021. Reported feelings of depression were higher among adults living alone (6.4%) compared with adults living with others (4.1%), for both men and women, across most race and Hispanic-origin groups, and by family income. Adults who reported never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living alone were almost twice as likely to report feelings of depression than those never or rarely receiving social and emotional support and living with others (19.6% compared with 11.6%, respectively). Yet no significant difference was seen in reported feelings of depression among those who reported sometimes, usually, or always receiving social and emotional support by whether they were living alone or living with others. Conclusion-Adults living alone had higher reported feelings of depression than adults living with others. Differences in feelings of depression by living arrangement were observed for most of the characteristics examined.","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":"878 20","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140467496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alzheimer Disease or Other Dementias in Adult Day Services Centers, 2020.","authors":"Priyanka Singh, J. Lendon, Manisha Sengupta","doi":"10.15620/cdc:135024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:135024","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives-Alzheimer disease or other dementias are among the most common chronic conditions of adult day services center (ADSC) participants. This report compares prevalence of these conditions (referred to collectively as dementia) among participants in ADSCs that provide specialized care for dementia with other ADSCs, by census region, metropolitan statistical area status, chain affiliation, and ownership type. Methods-This report uses data from the ADSC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study. The survey collects data on ADSCs every 2 years from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data were collected from January 2020 through mid-July 2021. The results are based on survey responses from about 1,800 eligible ADSCs from a census of 5,500 ADSCs and are weighted to be nationally representative. The percentage of participants diagnosed with dementia is calculated from responses to a question about the number of current participants diagnosed with dementia. Geographical and ADSC characteristics include census region, metropolitan statistical area, ownership status, and chain affiliation. Results-In ADSCs that provide specialized dementia care, 42.2% of participants had dementia, while 22.7% of participants also had dementia in ADSCs that do not specialize in dementia care. The overall prevalence of dementia was similar across regions, with a slightly lower percentage in the West. Dementia was more prevalent in ADSCs in metropolitan statistical areas, nonchain centers, and nonprofit centers. In general, for each of the selected characteristics, the prevalence of dementia was higher in specialized centers than in nonspecialized centers.","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":"33 2","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140524026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Trends in Emergency Department Visits Among People Younger Than Age 65 by Insurance Status: United States, 2010-2021.","authors":"Loredana Santo, Susan M Schappert, Jill J Ashman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose-This report describes trends in emergency department visits among people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2021, by health insurance status and selected demographic and hospital characteristics. Methods-Estimates in this report are based on data collected in the 2010-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Data were weighted to produce annual national estimates. Patient and hospital characteristics are presented by primary expected source of payment. Results-Private insurance and Medicaid were the most common primary expected sources of payment at emergency department visits by people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2013. Medicaid was the most common primary expected source of payment from 2014 through 2021. Among children younger than age 18 years, the most common primary expected source of payment was Medicaid across the entire period. The percentage of visits by children with no insurance decreased from 7.4% in 2010 to 3.0% in 2021. Among adults, the percentage of visits with Medicaid increased from 25.5% in 2010 to 38.9% in 2021, and the percentage of visits by those with no insurance decreased from 24.6% to 11.1% during this period. Among Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people, Medicaid was the most frequent primary expected source of payment during the entire period. Among White non-Hispanic people, private insurance was the most frequent primary expected source of payment through 2015, while private insurance and Medicaid were the most frequent primary expected sources of payment from 2016 through 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 197","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139513170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alzheimer Disease or Other Dementias in Adult Day Services Centers, 2020.","authors":"Priyanka Singh, Jessica P Lendon, Manisha Sengupta","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-Alzheimer disease or other dementias are among the most common chronic conditions of adult day services center (ADSC) participants. This report compares prevalence of these conditions (referred to collectively as dementia) among participants in ADSCs that provide specialized care for dementia with other ADSCs, by census region, metropolitan statistical area status, chain affiliation, and ownership type. Methods-This report uses data from the ADSC component of the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study. The survey collects data on ADSCs every 2 years from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data were collected from January 2020 through mid-July 2021. The results are based on survey responses from about 1,800 eligible ADSCs from a census of 5,500 ADSCs and are weighted to be nationally representative. The percentage of participants diagnosed with dementia is calculated from responses to a question about the number of current participants diagnosed with dementia. Geographical and ADSC characteristics include census region, metropolitan statistical area, ownership status, and chain affiliation. Results-In ADSCs that provide specialized dementia care, 42.2% of participants had dementia, while 22.7% of participants also had dementia in ADSCs that do not specialize in dementia care. The overall prevalence of dementia was similar across regions, with a slightly lower percentage in the West. Dementia was more prevalent in ADSCs in metropolitan statistical areas, nonchain centers, and nonprofit centers. In general, for each of the selected characteristics, the prevalence of dementia was higher in specialized centers than in nonspecialized centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 198","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139672245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}