Law and History Review最新文献_第2页

Disobedient Children, Hybrid Filiality: Negotiating Parent–Child Relations in Local Legal System in Republican China, 1911–1949 忤逆子女，混合孝道：民国时期中国地方法制中的亲子关系谈判，1911-1949 年

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000512

Shumeng Han, Xiangyi Ren

{"title":"Disobedient Children, Hybrid Filiality: Negotiating Parent–Child Relations in Local Legal System in Republican China, 1911–1949","authors":"Shumeng Han, Xiangyi Ren","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0738248023000512","url":null,"abstract":"The principle of filial piety underpinned both parent–child relations and, more broadly, Qing legal and social order. Entering the turbulent years of the Qing–Republic transition, filial piety went through substantial changes. Drawn from the local legal archives in Jiangjin county, Sichuan, this research traces the transformation of filial piety in legal practice during the first half of the twentieth century. It argues that two overlapping processes—legal reforms and nation-state building—synergized to restructure the meaning of filial piety from a largely integrated principle in Qing, which bridged the gaps between filiality and loyalty to the emperor and between personalized morality and imperial state legitimacy, to divergent new interpretations of filial piety, including the individualist filial piety, nationalist filial piety, legal filial piety, and sentimental filial piety. Each new interpretation inherits only part of its original meaning and incorporates newly introduced legal knowledge of legal equality and property ownership. The article concludes that various, sometimes contradictory interpretations of filial piety indicate the Republican legal reforms as an in-between, dynamic spectrum of legal change with vigorous negotiations among different legal actors and knowledge regimes.","PeriodicalId":17960,"journal":{"name":"Law and History Review","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139469951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring African Abolitionism: Fante Perspectives on Domestic Slavery in the Nineteenth-Century Gold Coast 探索非洲废奴主义：十九世纪黄金海岸家庭奴隶制的方特视角

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000548

Michael Ehis Odijie

{"title":"Exploring African Abolitionism: Fante Perspectives on Domestic Slavery in the Nineteenth-Century Gold Coast","authors":"Michael Ehis Odijie","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0738248023000548","url":null,"abstract":"This article draws on a variety of primary sources to first illustrate the rise of African abolitionism in the Fante region in the mid-nineteenth century and then situate local abolitionists in the context of colonial legal abolition in the Gold Coast. When the British abolished slavery in 1874, various Fante groups had been developing local anti-slavery views and strategies closely connected to the evolution of a Fante ethnic identity fashioned against the “barbaric” Asante. Tensions arose between the Fante intelligentsia, which spearheaded local abolitionism, and British colonial elites. The article examines the rise of local abolitionism among the coastal Fante through specific ideas, individuals, and events, and discusses subsequent dynamics in the “first age” (1874–1900) of colonial abolitionism in the Gold Coast. It shows that the 1874 abolition was opposed by members of the Fante anti-slavery movement not—as has been argued—because Fante intellectuals were pro-slavery or opposed to the idea of abolition, but because they held different visions of emancipation and were critical of British abolition laws that, unlike in the West Indies, did not compensate slaveowners.","PeriodicalId":17960,"journal":{"name":"Law and History Review","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139407979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

An Instrument of Military Power: The Development and Evolution of Japanese Martial Law in Occupied Territories, 1894–1945 – ERRATUM 军事力量的工具：1894-1945 年日本在被占领土上的戒严发展与演变 - ERRATUM

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000640

Kelly Maddox

引用次数: 0

An Instrument of Military Power: The Development and Evolution of Japanese Martial Law in Occupied Territories, 1894–1945 军事力量的工具:1894-1945年日本占领区戒严法的发展与演变

3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000524

Kelly Maddox

引用次数: 0

Ahmad Bey's 1846 Istiftāʾ: Its Dual Legislative Framework and Religio-Political Context 艾哈迈德·贝伊的《1846年法》:双重立法框架与宗教政治语境

3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000573

Ismael Musah Montana

引用次数: 0

The Edicts of the Praetors: Law, Time, and Revolution in Ancient Rome 《裁判官法令:古罗马的法律、时间和革命》

3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000500

Lisa Pilar Eberle

引用次数: 0

Human Rights at the Edges of Late Imperial Britain: The Tyrer Case and Judicial Corporal Punishment from the Isle of Man to Montserrat, 1972–1990 大英帝国晚期边缘的人权:1972-1990年从曼岛到蒙特塞拉特的泰勒案和司法体罚

3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000494

Christopher Hilliard, Marco Duranti

{"title":"Human Rights at the Edges of Late Imperial Britain: The Tyrer Case and Judicial Corporal Punishment from the Isle of Man to Montserrat, 1972–1990","authors":"Christopher Hilliard, Marco Duranti","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000494","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0738248023000494","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Tyrer v. United Kingdom (1978), the European Court of Human of Human Rights ruled that judicial corporal punishment contravened Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which proscribed “degrading treatment or punishment.” The case unfolded at a formative moment in British legal activism, as left-wing civil-liberties lawyers who had been wary of human rights discourse began taking cases to Strasbourg. The case also involved tactical challenges for British politicians and government lawyers. The case originated on the Isle of Man, which is close to the British mainland but constitutionally not part of the United Kingdom: it is a “crown dependency” with its own executive, legislature, and judiciary, and it persisted with judicial corporal punishment long after the practice had been abolished in Great Britain. By convention, the British government respected the island's laws and criminal-justice policies, but Britain was responsible for the island's compliance with international agreements—including the European Convention on Human Rights. How the British government dealt with the Isle of Man during and after the litigation had direct implications for a host of other small territories in what remained of the British empire—in particular, Britain's remaining Caribbean territories. The Tyrer case's protracted endgame was an object lesson in how much Britain's “unwritten” constitution depends on negotiation, manipulation, and avoiding the overt exercise of powers that might crumble upon use.","PeriodicalId":17960,"journal":{"name":"Law and History Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135819354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

LHR volume 41 issue 4 Cover and Back matter LHR 第 41 卷第 4 期封面和封底

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000597

引用次数: 0

LHR volume 41 issue 4 Cover and Front matter LHR 第 41 卷第 4 期封面和封底

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000603

引用次数: 0

Michael Ng, Political Censorship in British Hong Kong: Freedom of Expression and the Law (1842–1997) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. Pp. xiv + 211. Hardcover $39.99 (ISBN 9781108830027). doi:10.1017/9781108908580 吴国强，英属香港的政治审查:言论自由与法律(1842-1997)，剑桥:剑桥大学出版社，2022。第14页+ 211页精装本39.99美元(ISBN 9781108830027)。doi: 10.1017 / 9781108908580

3区社会学

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/s0738248023000482

Michael Lobban

引用次数: 0