Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej最新文献_第10页

Prawo demokratycznie legitymizowane– deliberacja i upodmiotowienie obywateli.Wprowadzenie

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2022.4.5

Piotr W. Juchacz

引用次数: 0

Uwagi na temat aksjologicznego wymiaru Konstytucji RP z 1997 r. i jej wykładni w świetle prac Profesora Piotra Winczorka 根据 Piotr Winczorek 教授的著作对 1997 年《波兰共和国宪法》的公理层面及其解释的看法

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2022.1.113

Sławomir Tkacz, Zygmunt Tobor

{"title":"Uwagi na temat aksjologicznego wymiaru Konstytucji RP z 1997 r. i jej wykładni w świetle prac Profesora Piotra Winczorka","authors":"Sławomir Tkacz, Zygmunt Tobor","doi":"10.36280/afpifs.2022.1.113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2022.1.113","url":null,"abstract":"This article is an extended and supplemented version of the address given during the scientific conference dedicated to Professor Piotr Winczorek. The authors made an attempt to reconstruct theory-of-law views based on the statements of Piotr Winczorek. The subject of the research was especially issues related to the axiology of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. In the course of research such issues as the concept of the legal order in the light of constitutional provisions, constitutional values, constitutional principles, and sources of law were taken up. One of the interesting problems emphasized by Piotr Winczorek was whether the basic law should be frugal in terms of manifesting values. The research is supplemented by an analysis of the problems of legal interpretation in the works of Piotr Winczorek. The conducted analyses enable formulating a general conclusion that many problems raised by Piotr Winczorek are referred to in the current constitutional disputes. Therefore, it is worthwhile to refer to the works of Professor Winczorek, whose statements can be treated as an authentic interpretation of the Polish Constitution of 1997.","PeriodicalId":179034,"journal":{"name":"Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133820632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Powrót do przeszłości? O przemianach prawnych mechanizmów regulacji pamięci zbiorowej w Hiszpanii z perspektywy Europy Środkowej

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2021.3.22

Filip Cyuńczyk

引用次数: 0

Filozofia prawa dla sędziów społecznych. Perspektywa Hegla i Fichtego

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2022.4.52

E. Nowak

{"title":"Filozofia prawa dla sędziów społecznych. Perspektywa Hegla i Fichtego","authors":"E. Nowak","doi":"10.36280/afpifs.2022.4.52","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2022.4.52","url":null,"abstract":"The article, following an outline of the historical context, designs a normative justification of citizens’ participation in the public administration of justice on the basis of the philosophy of right of Georg W.F. Hegel and Johann G. Fichte. Their complementary philosophies of right provide solid foundations for a modern philosophy of right for lay judges (also called honorary judges). It is further argued that Hegel’s concept of the honorary judge as a subject who realizes their right to political and legal self-awareness and is integral to the administration of justice has greater and more topical potential than its equivalent in Fichte’s writings. Fichtean honorary judges act outside the legal framework, by virtue of a civic contract on reciprocal judicial support in emergency. All inquiries, documented with sources, due to the novelty of the issue, lead to the following conclusions: 1) lay judges’ activism according to Fichte “invalidates” a wrongful, defective or unjust law. In this way Fichte anticipates Radbruch’s Formula; 2) Hegelian honorary judges have impact on the real transformation of modern, atomistic society of idiotes (individuals with private interests) into a society of polites (as in the ancient Greek politeia or Roman res publica), transform institutions into public bodies in the strong sense of this term; finally, they prevent the alienation of society and law.","PeriodicalId":179034,"journal":{"name":"Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123541339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rodzaje testów judicial review a zasada proporcjonalności

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2022.2.54

Milena Korycka-Zirk

引用次数: 0

Kształtowanie świadomości konstytucyjnej w dyskursie prawniczym i publicznym. Wprowadzenie

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2022.2.5

S. Žalimienė, B. Wojciechowski

引用次数: 0

Judicial Disobedience, Justice Lemuel Shaw and Commonwealth v. Aves 司法抗命，Lemuel Shaw法官和联邦诉艾维斯案

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2022.3.103

J. Zajadło

引用次数: 0

Professor Ryszard Sarkowicz (1952–2021)

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2021.2.123

Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki

引用次数: 0

Non-textual Elements in Judicial Opinions: Overview 司法意见中的非文本要素:综述

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36280//afpifs.2023.2.77

Magdalena Wojdala

引用次数: 0